Surgery
Volume 134, Issue 4 , Pages 542-547, October 2003

Cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanomas

From The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Accepted 11 May 2003.

Abstract 

Background

Consideration of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended for thin melanomas with poor prognostic features; however, few metastases are identified. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of SLNB in this population.

Methods

The prospective melanoma database was reviewed to identify patients with melanomas <1.2 mm thick who had undergone SLNB. Physician and hospital charges were collected from the appropriate billing department.

Results

A total of 138 patients were identified over an 8-year period (1994-2002). Two patients with positive SLNs were identified (1.4%), one with a melanoma <1 mm thick. Patient charges for SLNB ranged from $10,096 to $15,223, compared with $1000 to $1740 for wide excision as an outpatient. Using these charges, the cost to identify a single positive SLN would be between $696,600 and $1,051,100. The cost for wide excision would be between $69,000 and $120,100. Assuming that all patients with a positive SLN would die of melanoma, the cost per life saved would be $627,000 to $931,000.

Conclusions

The cost of performing SLNB in this population is great and only a small number will have disease identified that will alter treatment. These data call into question the appropriateness of SLNB for thin melanomas.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, March 20–22, 2003.

PII: S0039-6060(03)00275-7

doi:10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00275-7

Surgery
Volume 134, Issue 4 , Pages 542-547, October 2003