« Previous
Next »
Surgery
Volume 144, Issue 4
, Pages 606-610
, October 2008
The use of radioisotope combined with isosulfan blue dye is not superior to radioisotope alone for the identification of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer
References
- . Predicting axillary nodal positivity in 2282 patients with breast carcinoma. World J Surg. 2001;25:767–772
- . Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol. 1993;2:335–339
- A randomized comparison of sentinel node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:546–553
- NSABP-32: phase III, randomized trial comparing axillary resection with sentinel lymph node resection: a description of the trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(3 Suppl):208S–210S
- American Cancer Society National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines. www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.asp.
- American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Recommendations for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7703–7720
- . Anaphylaxis to isosulfan blue and cross-reactivity to patent blue V: case report and review of the nomenclature of vital blue dyes. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006;96:497–500
- . Adverse drug reactions during lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy for solid neoplasms. Am Surg. 2005;71:720–724
- Incidence of anaphylactoid reactions to isosulfan blue dye during breast carcinoma lymphatic mapping in patients treated with preoperative prophylaxis: results of a surgical prospective clinical practice protocol. Cancer. 2005;104:692–699
- . Factitious oxygen desaturation after isosulfan blue injection. Am Surg. 2003;69:899–901
- Effect on oximetry of dyes used for sentinel lymph node biopsy: are there differences?. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1204–1207
- Anaphylactoid reactions to isosulfan blue dye during breast cancer lymphatic mapping in patients given preoperative prophylaxis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:567–568
- A prospective analysis of the effect of blue-dye volume on sentinel lymph node mapping success and incidence of allergic reaction in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:535–541
- . Can methylene blue only be used in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer?. Breast J. 2006;12:428–430
- . Adverse skin lesions after methylene blue injections for sentinel lymph node localization. Am J Surg. 2002;184:350–352
- Is blue dye indicated for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients with a positive lymphoscintigram?. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:712–717
- A trend analysis of the relative value of blue dye and isotope localization in 2,000 consecutive cases of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:473–478
- . Concordance and validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye and technetium 99m sulfur colloid. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:467–475
- Intradermal radioisotope is superior to peritumoral blue dye or radioisotope in identifying breast cancer sentinel nodes. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:561–566
- Axillary sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: a single lymphatic pathway drains the entire mammary gland. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:479–484
- Concordance of peritumoral technetium 99M colloid and subareolar blue dye injection in breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy. J Surg Res. 2007;143:126–129
- . Randomized clinical trial comparing blue dye with combined dye and isotope for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1494–1497
- Learning sentinel node biopsy: Results of a prospective randomized trial of two techniques. Surgery. 1999;126:714–722
- . Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients: A comprehensive review of variations in performance and technique. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:804–816
- . Lymphatic mapping techniques and sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Surg Clin N Am. 2007;87:353–364
Presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Cincinnati, Ohio, March 6–8, 2008.
PII: S0039-6060(08)00425-X
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.023
© 2008 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Surgery
Volume 144, Issue 4
, Pages 606-610
, October 2008
