Surgery
Volume 145, Issue 6 , Pages 675-681, June 2009

Esophageal atresia: Prognostic classification revisited

  • Tatsuya Okamoto, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Tatsuya Okamoto, MD, Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54-Kawahara-cho, Sho-goin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
  • ,
  • Shigeru Takamizawa, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nagano Children's Hospital, Nagano, Japan
  • ,
  • Hiroshi Arai, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
  • ,
  • Yuko Bitoh, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
  • ,
  • Makoto Nakao, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
  • ,
  • Akiko Yokoi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
  • ,
  • Eiji Nishijima, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan

Accepted 16 January 2009. published online 13 April 2009.

Background

Although the Spitz classification is the most widely used prognostic classification for esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula (EA), its discrimination ability remains unclear. We sought to develop a more accurate prognostic classification for EA.

Methods

The records of 121 consecutive infants with EA (1980–2005) were reviewed. The independent variables included 6 clinical characteristics, and the dependent variables were survival and mortality. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to construct models predicting mortality and create a revised prognostic classification. The discrimination abilities of the revised classification and the Spitz classification were compared using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

Birth weight and the presence of major cardiac anomalies were significant prognostic factors for mortality, and major cardiac anomalies affected mortality more than birth weight. The ROC curve for birth weight suggested that 2,000 g was an appropriate cutoff point. The Spitz classification was revised as follows: the revised class I (low-risk group) consisted of patients without major cardiac anomalies and birth weight >2,000 g; class II (moderate-risk group) consisted of patients without major cardiac abnormalities and birth weight <2,000 g; class III (relatively high-risk group) consisted of patients with major cardiac anomalies and birth weight >2,000 g; and class IV (high-risk group) consisted of patients with major cardiac anomalies and birth weight <2,000 g. The ROC comparisons showed that the revised classification provided a significant improvement (P = .049).

Conclusion

This revised classification can improve the stratification of EA patients and be a useful predictor of survival.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0039-6060(09)00100-7

doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.01.017

Surgery
Volume 145, Issue 6 , Pages 675-681, June 2009