Journal Home
Search for

Volume 146, Issue 5, Pages 869-881 (November 2009)


View previous. 8 of 26 View next.

Prognostic implications of tumor invasion or adhesion to peripancreatic vessels in resected pancreatic cancer

Ugo Boggi, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Marco Del Chiaro, MDa, Chiara Croce, MDa, Fabio Vistoli, MDa, Stefano Signori, MDa, Carlo Moretto, MDa, Gabriella Amorese, MDb, Salvatore Mazzeo, MDc, Carla Cappelli, MDc, Daniela Campani, MDd, Franco Mosca, MDe

Accepted 4 April 2009. published online 16 July 2009.

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the operative risk and the prognostic implications of pancreatectomy plus resection and reconstruction of peripancreatic vessels (PPV) in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Methods

One hundred ten patients who underwent pancreatectomy with PPV resection and reconstruction (Study Group; SG) were retrospectively compared with 62 patients without distant metastasis who were palliated, (Control Group 1; CG-1), as well as 197 patients who underwent “conventional”pancreatectomy (Control Group 2; CG-2).

Results

Postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar in SG (33% and 3%), in CG-1 (26% and 3%), and in CG-2 (40% and 6%) patients. Median survival time (MST) of SG patients (15 months) was longer than that of CG-1 patients (6 months; P < .0001) and similar to that of CG-2 patients (18 months). Patients undergoing isolated venous resection (n = 84) had the best outcome (MST: 15 months) ( P < .0001 vs CG-1 patients), while patients undergoing resection of multiple PPV (n = 14) had the worst outcome (MST: 8 months). PPV infiltration, histologically proven in 64 patients (65%), was associated with decreased MST only if the tunica intima was infiltrated (26%) (11 months; P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that no adjuvant therapy, intimal invasion, and poorly differentiated histology were associated with a higher hazard of death by 2.2, 2.2, and 2.5-fold, respectively.

Conclusion

In properly selected patients, pancreatectomy plus resection and reconstruction of PPV was performed as safely as palliation or “conventional” pancreatectomy and was associated with better survival when compared to palliation.

a Divisione di Chirurgia Generale e Trapianti nell'Uremico e nel Diabetico, Pisa, Italy

b Divisione di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Pisa, Italy

c Divisione di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, Pisa, Italy

d Divisione di Anatomia Patologica Sperimentale, Pisa, Italy

e Divisione di Chirurgia Generale 1 Universitaria, Pisa, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ugo Boggi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Divisione di Chirurgia Generale e Trapianti nell'Uremico e nel Diabetico, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Divsione di Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale di Cisanello Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.

PII: S0039-6060(09)00295-5

doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.04.029


View previous. 8 of 26 View next.