Scalpel safety in the operative setting: A systematic review
Accepted 20 August 2009. published online 14 October 2009.
Background
The complex environment of the operative setting provides multiple opportunities for health care workers to sustain scalpel injuries; scalpels are the second most frequent source of sharps injuries in this setting. Little evidence has been published detailing the effectiveness of proposed safety procedures and devices.
Methods
A systematic search strategy was used to identify relevant studies. Studies were included based on the application of a predetermined protocol, an independent assessment by 2 reviewers, and a consensus decision. Nineteen articles formed the evidence base for this review.
Results
Little high-level evidence was available. The results of studies reporting on 5 different devices/procedures were identified: the use of cut-resistant gloves/liners decreased the number of glove perforations in comparison with double latex gloves alone but lessened the wearer's dexterity and tactile sensation; the benefit derived from the use of the hands-free passing technique seemed equivocal; “sharpless surgery” was found to be feasible; a single-handed blade remover prevented at least as many injuries as a safety scalpel; and some shoe materials provided superior foot protection.
Conclusion
The lack of available evidence highlights the need for the generation of a methodologically rigorous, clinically relevant, and statistically valid body of primary research in this area to support appropriate and effective safety interventions.
aAustralian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures–Surgical (ASERNIP-S), Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, Australia
bDiscipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
cDiscipline of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
dEmergency Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
eDepartment of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Mater Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia
Reprint requests: Guy J. Maddern, PhD, FRACS, P.O. Box 553, Stepney SA 5069, Australia.
Supported by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing and the South Australian Department of Health.
ABSTRACT