Surgery
Volume 146, Issue 6 , Pages 1090-1098 , December 2009

Improvement in the accuracy of reporting key prognostic and anatomic findings during thyroidectomy by using a novel Web-based synoptic operative reporting system

  • Anthony J. Chambers, MS, FRACS
  • ,
  • Janice L. Pasieka, MD, FRCSC, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Janice L. Pasieka, MD, FRCSC, FACS, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary and the Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 10th Floor North Tower, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada.
  • ,
  • Walley J. Temple, MD, FRCSC

,Accepted 25 September 2009.

References 

  1. Hay ID, Bergstralh EJ, Goellner JR, Ebersold JR, Grant CS. Predicting outcome in papillary thyroid carcinoma: development of a reliable prognostic scoring system in a cohort of 1779 patients surgically treated at one institution during 1940 through 1989. Surgery. 1993;114:1050–1058
  2. Hay ID, Thompson GB, Grant CS, Bergstralh EJ, Dvorak CE, Gorman CA, et al. Papillary thyroid carcinoma managed at the Mayo Clinic during six decades (1940-1999): temporal trends in initial therapy and long-term outcome in 2444 consecutively treated patients. World J Surg. 2002;26:879–885
  3. Tuttle RM, Leboeuf R. Follow up approaches in thyroid cancer: a risk adapted paradigm. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008;37:419–435
  4. Jonklaas J, Sarlis NJ, Litofsky D, Ain KB, Bigos ST, Brierley JD, et al. Outcomes of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma following initial therapy. Thyroid. 2006;16:1229–1242
  5. Shaha A. Treatment of thyroid cancer based on risk groups. J Surg Oncol. 2006;94:683–691
  6. Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, et al. Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2006;16:109–142
  7. Edhemovic I, Temple WJ, de Gara CJ, Stuart GC. The computer synoptic operative report–a leap forward in the science of surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:941–947
  8. Laflamme MR, Dexter PR, Graham MF, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Efficiency, comprehensiveness and cost-effectiveness when comparing dictation and electronic templates for operative reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;425–429
  9. Novitsky YW, Sing RF, Kercher KW, Griffo ML, Matthews BD, Heniford BT. Prospective, blinded evaluation of accuracy of operative reports dictated by surgical residents. Am Surg. 2005;71:627–632
  10. Moore RA. The dictated operative note: important but is it being taught?. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190:639–640
  11. DeOrio JK. Surgical templates for orthopedic operative reports. Orthopedics. 2002;25:639–642
  12. Harvey A, Zhang H, Nixon J, Brown CJ. Comparison of data extraction from standardized versus traditional narrative operative reports for database-related research and quality control. Surgery. 2007;141:708–714
  13. D'Avanzo A, Ituarte P, Treseler P, Kebebew E, Wu J, Wong M, et al. Prognostic scoring systems in patients with follicular thyroid cancer: a comparison of different staging systems in predicting the patient outcome. Thyroid. 2004;14:453–458
  14. Lang BH, Lo CY, Chan WF, Lam KY, Wan KY. Staging systems for papillary thyroid carcinoma: a review and comparison. Ann Surg. 2007;245:366–378

PII: S0039-6060(09)00573-X

doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.032

Surgery
Volume 146, Issue 6 , Pages 1090-1098 , December 2009