Surgery
Volume 147, Issue 2 , Pages 219-226, February 2010

Fast-track surgery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it feasible in a general surgery unit?

  • Marco Scatizzi, MD

      Affiliations

    • General Surgery Unit, Misericordia e Dolce Hospital, Prato, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Francesco Feroci, MD, General Surgery Unit, Misericordia e Dolce Hospital, Piazza dell'Ospedale 5, 59100 Prato, Italy.
  • ,
  • Katrin C. Kröning, MD

      Affiliations

    • General Surgery Unit, Misericordia e Dolce Hospital, Prato, Italy
  • ,
  • Vieri Boddi, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • Marco De Prizio, MD

      Affiliations

    • General Surgery Unit, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
  • ,
  • Francesco Feroci, MD

      Affiliations

    • General Surgery Unit, Misericordia e Dolce Hospital, Prato, Italy

Accepted 29 September 2009. published online 06 November 2009.

Background

The aim of the “fast-track surgery” program is to decrease the peri-operative stress response to surgical trauma and thus to a decrease in complication rates after elective surgery. Critics of fast-track (FT) rehabilitation may argue that all reports of successful programs came from major specialized hospital units and that implementation in smaller or less specialized units may be difficult if not impossible.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 101 patients who, from November 2004 to October 2007, underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery in our institute. A detailed FT surgery protocol had been prepared and given to patients, physicians and nurses, with the aim to create a standard treatment. Data about demographics, ASA score, pre-operative complicating diseases, diagnosis, type of surgery, and postoperative clinical data were analyzed. Univariate analysis of the relationship between all factors (patient characteristics, intervention characteristics, protocol compliance and presence of complications) described here and length of hospital stay was performed.

Results

We compared our results to published major trials and observed no substantial differences in morbidity, mortality and length of postoperative hospital stay between the 2. Univariate analysis showed that compliance to the elements of the FT protocol influences the length of postoperative period more significantly than patient characteristics or surgical procedure.

Conclusion

Based on 6 comparative single-center studies, the FT program was found to reduce length of hospital stay, and was deemed safe for major abdominal surgeries. Present study shows that enhanced recovery or FT program can also be implemented safely in a general surgery unit.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0039-6060(09)00605-9

doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.035

Surgery
Volume 147, Issue 2 , Pages 219-226, February 2010