« Previous
Next »
Surgery
Volume 147, Issue 3
, Pages 358-365
, March 2010
Staging error does not explain the relationship between the number of lymph nodes in a colon cancer specimen and survival
References
- . More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 2006;244:602–610
- Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2912–2919
- . Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3570–3575
- Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:583–596
- Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT). J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1991;6:325–344
- Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1269–1284
- . Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433–441
- Correlation of regional lymph node in vitro antitumor immunoreactivity histology with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1976;36:3665–3671
- . Studies concerning the regional lymph node in cancer. VI. Correlation of lymphocyte transformation of regional node cells and some histopathologic discriminants. Cancer. 1973;32:104–111
- . Mesocolic lymph node histology is an important prognostic indicator for patients with carcinoma of the sigmoid colon: an immunomorphologic study. Cancer. 1975;35:1388–1396
- . Prognosis in colon cancer: a pathologic reassessment. Arch Surg. 1975;110:908–913
- Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA. 2007;298:2149–2154
- National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Available at http://seer.cancer.gov/manuals/2007/SPCM_2007maindoc.pdf. Accessed on May 31, 2007.
- National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov. Accessed on May 31, 2007.
- Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA. 2000;284:3028–3035
- For patients with Dukes' B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer. 1998;83:666–672
- . Advanced statistics: statistical methods for analyzing cluster and cluster-randomized data. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:330–341
- . The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:65–71
- Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg. 2002;235:458–463
- . Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:439–445
- Lymphoid hyperplasia: a major prognostic feature in 519 cases of colorectal carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 1980;100:469–480
- . Prognostic significance of histologic host response in cancer of the large bowel. Cancer. 1981;47:930–936
- . Association between invasiveness, inflammatory reaction, desmoplasia and survival in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1989;42:162–166
- Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2654–2666
- Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 2006;313:1960–1964
- Relationship between number of breast cancer operations performed and 5-year survival after treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:539–544
- Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:163–171
- Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection. J Surg Oncol. 2003;83:68–78discussion, 78-9
Supported in part by research grants from the National Institutes of Health (K30 RR22260 and K24 DK68380).
PII: S0039-6060(09)00613-8
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.003
© 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Surgery
Volume 147, Issue 3
, Pages 358-365
, March 2010
