« Previous
Next »
Surgery
Volume 148, Issue 4
, Pages 625-637
, October 2010
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals
References
- . The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910–925
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Statistics Reports. 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD; 2008.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Statistics Reports. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD; 2009.
- . Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983;15:59–64
- A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery. 2001;129:390–400
- . Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4:91–94
- Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from a comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;182:687–692
- . Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide. World J Surg. 1999;23:835–845
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2004;239:43–52
- The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:519–531
- The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491–507
- . The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery. 2005;138:837–843
- The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:1089–1102
- American College of Surgeons. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program operations manual. American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL; 2007.
- . Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test. Eval Rev. 2005;29:530–558
- . AHA Annual Survey Database™ for fiscal year 2008. Vol. 2009;American Hospital Association, Chicago, IL
- A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery. 1992;112:497–501
- Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg. 1996;20:263–266
- A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1994;219:725–728
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg. 1996;20:17–20
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:334–337
- Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:336–340
- Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Am J Surg. 1998;175:232–235
- Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1599–1600
- . Laparoscopic appendectomy-is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:95–97
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7:335–339
- Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg. 1995;222:256–261
- Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg. 1997;132:708–711
- Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery. 1996;120:71–74
- A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg. 1995;169:208–212
- Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 1993;342:633–637
- . Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1204–1208
- Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1999;86:48–53
- Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:200–202
- . A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1023–1028
- Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88:200–205
- Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:842–847
- . A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177:250–256
- Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1999;9:17–26
- . Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:545–553
- . Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:289–295
- . Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1045–1050
- . Laparoscopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:398–403
- Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1060–1068
- Laparoscopic appendectomy: a viable alternative approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1997;7:1–6
- . Appendicitis: laparoscopic versus conventional operation: a study and review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7:459–463
- . Should a laparoscopic appendectomy be done?. Am Surg. 1998;64:231–233
- Randomized, single-blinded trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: effects on postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:801–806
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:439–448
- . Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am Surg. 2004;70:759–765
- . A comparative study of routine laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. JSLS. 2006;10:188–192
- . Is laparoscopic appendectomy the new 'gold standard'?. Arch Surg. 1995;130:782–785
- . Laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison with open appendectomy in 720 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;6:205–209
- . Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 1999;9:187–189
- . Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2000;179:375–378
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: is the postoperative infectious complication rate different?. Am Surg. 2005;71:813–815
- [Laparoscopic or classical appendectomy? A prospective randomized study]. Chirurg. 1994;65:112–120
- [Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study]. Chirurg. 1996;67:526–530
- . Appendicectomy in Scotland: a 20-year epidemiological comparison. J Public Health Med. 1997;19:213–218
- Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987–1996. Ann Surg. 2001;233:455–460
- . A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Cn J Surg. 1999;42:377–383
- . Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:685–692
- [The rationale of laparoscopic treatment in acute appendiceal disease]. Chir Ital. 2000;52:171–178
- . Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:940–943
- . Comparison of open and laparoscopic treatment of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg. 2001;182:211–214
- Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:495–499
- Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1174–1180
- . Laparoscopic is not better than open appendectomy. Am Surg. 1995;61:240–243
- Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital?. Am J Surg. 2005;190:950–954
- . Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:969–973
- . Results of laparoscopic vs. conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1700–1705
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:906–910
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:60–65
- Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg. 1997;1:188–192
- . Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2009;7:250–252
- Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg. 2009;33:208–214
- . Complicated appendicitis—is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting. Am Surg. 2007;73:737–741
- Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2004;188:813–820
Dr Ingraham is supported by the Clinical Scholar in Residence Program at the American College of Surgeons. Dr Bilimoria is supported by a Priority Grant from Northwestern University.
Dr Ingraham had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.
PII: S0039-6060(10)00393-4
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025
© 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Surgery
Volume 148, Issue 4
, Pages 625-637
, October 2010
