Advertisement
Original communication| Volume 48, ISSUE 5, P946-951, November 1960

Timing of nerve suture after a gunshot wound

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Differences of opinion exist regarding the desirability of early nerve suture at the time of débridement after a relatively clean incised wound. While many British surgeons disagree, the majority of Americans recommend this course and their statistics appear to justify the resultant saving of time. When a nerve is severed by a high velocity projectile, however, all neurosurgeons trained in the recent wars agree that suture should be deferred to a second stage to be performed at least 1 month after the primary débridement. This delay is mandatory, for a well-executed nerve repair immediately after injury by gunshot is not possible. The softened epineurium cannot be counted on to hold sutures, and there is no way of telling how much to trim off the injured stumps. Adequate proximal and distal neurolysis to insure a suture free of tension is not justified, because it exposes healthy tissue planes to the risk of spreading infection. The suture is therefore threatened by the risk of separation and, if it holds, by an endoneural barrier of scar tissue.
      A typical gunshot injury is described which illustrates the cause of failure of early nerve repair. The only result of suturing the blast-softened, seminecrotic ends of the divided median nerve was the development of neuroma-incontinuity. No regenerating axons could have penetrated the 3 cm. barrier of scar, which had to be excised and resutured after 3 months had been wasted. Attempts at primary suture under such conditions can delay recovery many months before failure of regeneration becomes a certainty and forces the surgeon to resect the neuroma and resuture the nerve.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Haymaker W.
        • Woodhall B.
        Peripheral Nerve Injuries: Principles of Diagnosis.
        in: ed. 2. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia1953: 123-132 (chap. 7)
        • Puckett W.O.
        • Grundfest H.
        • McElroy W.D.
        • McMillen J.H.
        Damage to Peripheral Nerves by High Velocity Missiles Without a Direct Hit.
        J. Neurosurg. 1946; 3: 294-305
      1. Seddon H.J. Peripheral Nerve Injuries. Medical Research Council, Nerve Injuries Committee, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London1954
        • Seddon H.J.
        Three Types of Nerve Injury.
        Brain. 1943; 66: 237-288
      2. Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Follow-up Study of 3,656 World War II Injuries. Veterans Administration Medical Monograph. United States Government Printing Office, Washington1956