This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
A comparison was made between manual and computer analysis of 50 dye-dilution curves.
No significant difference was found. A computer is recommended whenever patient care
depends on the prompt availability of cardiac output data.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Fitting a straight line when both variables are subject to error.Biometrics. 1949; 5: 207
- Rapidly repeated determinations of the cardiac output with the indicator-dilution technic.Am. J. Cardiol. 1964; 13: 790
- Estimations of cardiac output and central blood volume by dye dilution.Physiol. Rev. 1956; 36: 77
- Studies on the circulation. IV. Further analysis of the injection method, and of changes in hemodynamics under physiological and pathological conditions.Am. J. Physiol. 1932; 99: 534
- Serial cardiac output determinations in man.Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J. 1958; 5: 375
- Quantitative zoology.in: Harcourt, Brace & Company, New York1960: 180
Article info
Publication history
Received:
September 2,
1964
Footnotes
☆Supported by Grants from the United States Public Health Service, The Defence Research Board of Canada, and the Department of National Health and Welfare, Canada.
Identification
Copyright
© 1965 Published by Elsevier Inc.
