Letter to the editor| Volume 75, ISSUE 2, P317-318, February 1974

Pulse-contour vs. dye-dilution methods

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Visscher M.B.
        • Johnson J.A.
        The Fick principle; analysis of potential errors and its conventional applications.
        J. Appl. Physiol. 1953; 5: 635
        • Grenvik A.
        Errors of the dye dilution method compared to the direct Fick method in determination of cardiac output in man.
        Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1968; 18: 486
        • Jacobs R.R.
        • Schmitz A.
        • Heyden W.C.
        • et al.
        A comparison of the accuracies in the electro-magnetic flow meter in the cardiogreen dilution blood flow measurement techniques in a model.
        in: Surg. Forum. 19. 1968: 113
        • Carey J.S.
        • Williamson H.
        • Scott C.R.
        Accuracy of cardiac output computers.
        Ann. Surg. 1971; 174: 762
        • Jacobs R.R.
        • Heyden W.C.
        • Williams B.T.
        • et al.
        Cardiac output in the exercising dog: An evaluation of the dye dilution method using the electro-magnetic flow meter as the standard.
        J. Surg. Res. 1970; 10: 25