Pulse-contour vs. dye-dilution methods

E.L. Bradley III, M.D.
E.L. Bradley III
Affiliations
Department of Surgery Emory University School of Medicine 69 Butler St., S.E. Atlanta, Ga. 30303 USA
Search for articles by this author

This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

One-time access price info

Already a print subscriber? Claim online access

Already an online subscriber? Sign in

References

- Visscher M.B.
- Johnson J.A.
The Fick principle; analysis of potential errors and its conventional applications.
J. Appl. Physiol. 1953; 5: 635
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
- Grenvik A.
Errors of the dye dilution method compared to the direct Fick method in determination of cardiac output in man.
Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1968; 18: 486
- Jacobs R.R.
- Schmitz A.
- Heyden W.C.
- et al.
A comparison of the accuracies in the electro-magnetic flow meter in the cardiogreen dilution blood flow measurement techniques in a model.
in: Surg. Forum. 19. 1968: 113
- Google Scholar
- Carey J.S.
- Williamson H.
- Scott C.R.
Accuracy of cardiac output computers.
Ann. Surg. 1971; 174: 762
- Jacobs R.R.
- Heyden W.C.
- Williams B.T.
- et al.
Cardiac output in the exercising dog: An evaluation of the dye dilution method using the electro-magnetic flow meter as the standard.
J. Surg. Res. 1970; 10: 25

Property	Value
Status
Version
Ad File
Disable Ads Flag
Environment
Moat Init
Moat Ready
Contextual Ready
Contextual URL
Contextual Initial Segments
Contextual Used Segments
AdUnit
SubAdUnit
Custom Targeting
Ad Events
Invalid Ad Sizes