Advertisement
Central Surgical Association| Volume 82, ISSUE 4, P415-419, October 1977

Vascular endoscopy: Useful tool or interesting toy

  • Jonathan B. Towne
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: Jonathan B. Towne, M.D., Department of Surgery The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County Medical Complex, 8700 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53226.
    Affiliations
    From the Department of Surgery, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County Medical Complex, Milwaukee, Wis. USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Victor M. Bernhard
    Affiliations
    From the Department of Surgery, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County Medical Complex, Milwaukee, Wis. USA
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      A prospective protocol was designed to evaluate the efficacy and practicality of intraluminal endoscopy in vascular reconstructive procedures. The choledochoscope and the arthroscope which utilize the Hopkins Optical System, as well as other available fiberoptic endoscopy units, were evaluated in 91 vascular reconstructions, including 42 carotid endarterectomies, 24 femoral artery reconstructions, 13 popliteal artery anastomoses, seven aortic and iliac procedures, one renal reconstruction, and one tibial reconstruction. In three cases the internal surface of an occluded limb of an aortic graft was examined endoscopically following thrombectomy. The optical resolution of the Hopkins Optical System was superior to the fiberoptic units. Vascular endoscopy required 5 minutes or less in 53 cases, between 5 to 10 minutes in 29 cases, and more than 10 minutes in nine. There were no infections. The single complication was a 1 cm linear tear in the intima of an internal iliac artery. Positive findings were noted in 60 endoscopic studies, for an incidence of 66%. These consisted of intimal shreds in 47, elevated or irregular intimal flaps in 25, clot in five, and stenosis in three. In 26 cases the endoscopic findings were considered to be significant enough to possibly affect the ultimate outcome of the reconstruction.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Shore J.M.
        • Berci G.
        • Morgenstern L.
        The value of biliary endoscopy.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975; 140: 601
        • Vatz A.
        • Berci G.
        • Shore J.M.
        Operative nephroscopy.
        J Urol. 1972; 107: 355
        • Vollmar J.F.
        • Storz L.W.
        Vascular endoscopy.
        Surg Clin North Am. 1974; 54: 111