This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
The value of selecting patients for antibiotic cover during biliary surgery by the use of immediate gram stains of bile was determined in a nonrandomized prospective study which compared two groups of patients. Group A consisted of 119 consecutive patients in whom antibiotics were administered during operation according to the results of immediate gram stains on bile. Group B included 101 patients, none of whom received antibiotics. In Group A gentamicin was given for gram-negative bacteria, ampicillin for gram-positive organisms, and no antibiotics were given if no bacteria were seen on the gram stain. In Group A the incidence of wound sepsis was 7 percent, compared with 22 percent in Group B (p < 0.005). Septicemia occured in 2 percent of Group A, compared with 8 percent in Group B. It is concluded that immediate gram stains of bile will provide a means of selecting patients requiring antibiotic cover during biliary surgery; furthermore, this procedure is a practical way of reducing postoperative sepsis while avoiding unnecessary antibiotic administration.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Surgery
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- A current evaluation of antibiotics in surgery.Postgrad. Med. 1956; 20: 319
- Prophylactic postoperative antibiotics: A controlled study of 1007 cases.Arch. Surg. 1959; 79: 190
- The effective period of antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.Surgery. 1961; 50: 161
- Preoperative antibiotics in biliary surgery.Arch. Surg. 1973; 107: 319
- The reduction of surgical wound infection by prophylactic parenteral cephaloridine.Br. J. Surg. 1973; 60: 434
- Causes of failure in antibiotic treatment.Br. Med. J. 1972; 4: 473
- The significance of biliary pressure in cholangitis.Arch. Surg. 1969; 98: 629
- Bacteremia in association with hepatocellular and hepatobiliary disease.Postgrad. Med. J. 1967; 43: 7
- Fatal endotoxic shock of biliary tract origin complicating transhepatic cholangiography.Br. Med. J. 1973; 3: 147
- Multivariate analysis of clinical and operative findings associated with biliary sepsis.Br. J. Surg. 1976; 63: 528
- Antibiotic treatment of biliary sepsis.Surg. Clin. North Am. 1975; 55: 1379
- A controlled trial of parenteral prophylactic gentamicin therapy in biliary disease.Br. J. Surg. 1975; 62: 275
- Identification of the presence and type of biliary microflora by immediate gram stains.Surgery. 1977; 81: 469
- Bacterial flora of the appendix fossa in appendicitis and post-operative wound infection.J. Clin. Pathol. 1974; 27: 997
- Bacteriology and antibiotic selection in biliary surgery.Arch. Surg. 1968; 97: 533
- The routine use of antibiotics in elective abdominal surgery.Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1954; 99: 376
- Lancet. 1960; 2: 659
- An endogenous source for wound infection based on quantitative bacteriology of the biliary tract.Surgery. 1970; 63: 471
- Les canilicules biliares: Etude on microscope electronique.Acta Anat. (Basel). 1956; 26: 94
- Complication rate in general surgical cases: The value of penicillin and streptomycin as post-operative prophylaxis.N. Engl. J. Med. 1958; 259: 1045
- Short term antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery.Br. J. Surg. 1974; 61: 739
Accepted: October 5, 1976
☆Presented at the Tripartite Meeting, Philadelphia, Pa., 1976.
© 1977 Published by Elsevier Inc.