Advertisement
Original communication| Volume 92, ISSUE 1, P61-68, July 1982

Role of luminal H+ in the pathogenesis of experimental esophagitis

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      The pathogenesis of acidic reflux esophagitis was investigated in an experimental model with special emphasis on the role of lumen-to-mucosa diffusion of H+ in the pathogenetic mechanism. Esophageal damage was produced by perfusing an isolated segment of rabbit esophagus in situ with three injurious endogenous secretions of the upper gastrointestinal tract (taurocholate, 10 mM; pepsin, 2500 U/ml; lysolecithin, 2 mg/ml) with and without acid (HCl, 10 to 150 mM). The seventy of mucosal damage was assessed using as indicators of mucosal integrity transmucosal potential difference, net flux of Na+, and mucosal permeability to two neutral molecules of different sizes—3H-H2O and 14C-erythritol. The data indicate that although the presence of luminal acid is needed for mucosal damage to develop, there is no relationship between the severity of the damage and the magnitude of the lumen-to-mucosa diffusion of H+. Even markedly increased diffusion of H+ alone, induced by an unphysiologically high concentration of luminal acid (300 mM HCl), had only a minor influence on mucosal integrity, whereas all three test agents were able to cause severe mucosal damage in association with much lower rates of H+ diffusion. Furthermore, the seventy of the mucosal damage caused by an individual test agent was not dependent on the HCl concentration used (and hence on the magnitude of lumen-to-mucosa diffusion of H+). The data suggest that esophageal mucosal damage caused by taurocholate, pepsin, or lysolecithin in the presence of luminal acid is due to the direct action of the agent itself rather than to excessive accumulation of luminal H+ into the mucosal tissue.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chung RSK
        • Johnson GM
        • DenBesten L
        Effect of sodium taurocholate and ethanol on hydrogen ion absorption in rabbit esophagus.
        Dig Dis. 1977; 22: 582-588
        • Chung RSK
        • Magri J
        • DenBesten L
        Hydrogen ion transport in the rabbit esophagus.
        Am J Physiol. 1975; 229: 496-500
        • Dodds WJ
        • Hogan WJ
        • Helm JF
        • Dent J
        Pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis.
        Gastroenterology. 1981; 81: 376-394
        • Ferguson DJ
        • Sanchez-Palomera E
        • Sako Y
        • Clatworthy HV
        • Wangensteen OH
        Studies on experimental esophagitis.
        Surgery. 1950; 28: 1022-1039
        • Goldberg HI
        • Dodds WJ
        • Gee S
        • Montgomery C
        • Zboralske F
        Role of acid and pepsin in acute experimental esophagitis.
        Gastroenterology. 1969; 56: 223-230
        • Harmon JW
        • Johnson LF
        • Maydonovitch CL
        Effects of acid and bile salts on the rabbit esophageal mucosa.
        Dig Dis Sci. 1981; 26: 65-72
        • Henderson RD
        • Mugashe F
        • Jeejeebhoy KN
        • Cullen J
        • Szczepanski M
        • Boszko A
        • Marryatt G
        The role of bile and acid in the production of esophagitis and the motor defect of esophagitis.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1972; 14: 465-473
        • Henderson RD
        • Mugashe FL
        • Jeejeebhoy KN
        • Szczpanski MM
        • Cullen J
        • Marryatt G
        • Boszko A
        Synergism of acid and bile salts in the production of experimental esophagitis.
        Can J Surg. 1973; 16: 12-17
        • Kiriluk LB
        • Merendino KA
        • Wash S
        The comparative sensitivity of the mucosa of the various segments of the alimentary tract in the dog to acid-peptic action.
        Surgery. 1954; 35: 547-556
        • Kivilaakso E
        • Ehnholm C
        • Kalima TV
        • Lempinen M
        Duodenogastric reflux of lysolecithin in the pathogenesis of experimental porcine stress ulceration.
        Surgery. 1976; 79: 65-69
        • Kivilaakso E
        • Fromm D
        • Silen W
        Effect of bile salts and related compounds on isolated esophageal mucosa.
        Surgery. 1980; 87: 280-285
        • Kivilaakso E
        • Silen W
        Pathogenesis of experimental gastricmucosal injury.
        N Engl J Med. 1979; 301: 364-369
        • Orchard R
        • Reynolds K
        • Fox B
        • Andrews R
        • Parkins RA
        • Johnson AG
        Effect of lysolecithin on gastric mucosal structure and potential difference.
        Gut. 1977; 18: 457-461
        • Orlando RC
        • Powell DW
        • Carney CN
        Pathophysiology of acute acid injury in rabbit esophageal epithelium.
        J Clin Invest. 1981; 68: 286-293
        • Pope II, CE
        Pathophysiology and diagnosis of reflux esophagitis.
        Gastroenterology. 1976; 70: 445-454
        • Redo SF
        • Barnes WA
        • de la Sierra OA
        Perfusion of the canine esophagus with secretions of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
        Ann Surg. 1959; 149: 556-564
        • Rees W
        • Rhodes J
        Bile reflux in gastro-oesophageal disease.
        Clin Gastroenterol. 1977; 6: 179-200
        • Safaie-Shirazi S
        Effect of pepsin on ionic permeability of canine esophageal mucosa.
        J Surg Res. 1977; 22: 5-8
        • Safaie-Shirazi S
        • DenBesten L
        • Zike WL
        Effect of bile salts on the ionic permeability of the esophageal mucosa and their role in the production of esophagitis.
        Gastroenterology. 1975; 68: 728-733