Advertisement
Original communication| Volume 109, ISSUE 5, P602-609, May 1991

Somatosensory-evoked potentials during carotid artery surgery: Experience in 400 operations

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      A prospective study was undertaken to determine the efficiacy of monitoring somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) during carotid artery surgery in predicting a new ischemic neurologic deficit. Three hundred seventy-six patients underwent 400 reconstructions of the internal carotid artery. The mortality rate of the entire series was 0.8%. In 383 procedures, SEP amplitudes were always present during cross-clamping of the internal carotid artery. In spite of that, three neurologic deficits occurred, but all were associated with technical failures and not related to clamping ischemia. Complete loss of SEP amplitudes was noted in 17 procedures. Five of seven patients without an indwelling shunt showed a neurologic deficit after surgery, whereas shunt insertion in 10 resulted in three neurologic deficits. It is concluded that at present SEP recording is an accurate monitoring method in detecting clamping-related cerebral ischemia during carotid artery surgery.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Thompson JE
        • Talkington CM
        Carotid endarterectomy.
        Ann Surg. 1976; 184: 1-15
        • Artu AA
        • Strandness Jr., DE
        Delayed carotid shunt occlusion detected by electroencephalographic monitoring.
        J Clin Monit. 1989; 5: 119-122
        • Connolly JE
        • Kwaan JH
        • Stemmer EA
        Improved results with carotid endarterectomy.
        Ann Surg. 1977; 186: 334-342
        • McFarland HR
        • Pinkerton JA
        • Frye D
        Continuous electroencephalographic monitoring during carotid endarterectomy.
        J Cardiovasc Surg. 1988; 29: 12-18
        • Ricotta JJ
        • Charlton MH
        • Deweese JA
        Determining criteria for shunt placement during carotid endarterectomy.
        Ann Surg. 1983; : 642-645
        • Blume WT
        • Ferguson GG
        • McNeill DK
        Significance of EEG changes at carotid endarterectomy.
        Stroke. 1986; 17: 891-897
        • Corson JD
        • Chang BB
        • Shah DM
        • Leather RP
        • DeLeo BM
        • Karmody AM
        The influence of anesthetic choice on carotid endarterectomy outcome.
        Arch Surg. 1987; 122: 807-812
        • Imparato AM
        Extracranial vascular disease: advances in operative indications and technique.
        World J Surg. 1988; 12: 756-762
        • Imparato AM
        • Ramirez A
        • Riles TH
        • Mintzer R
        Cerebral protection in carotid surgery.
        Arch Surg. 1982; 117: 1073-1078
        • Kelly JJ
        • Callow AD
        • O'Donnell TF
        • et al.
        Failure of carotid stump pressure: its incidence as a predictor for a temporary shunt during carotid endarterectomy.
        Arch Surg. 1979; 114: 1361-1366
        • Peitzmann AB
        • Marshall W
        • Webster W
        • Loubeau JM
        • Grundy BL
        • Bahnson HT
        Carotid endarterectomy under regional (conductive) anesthesia.
        Ann Surg. 1982; 196: 59-64
        • Steed DL
        • Peitzmann AB
        • Grundy BL
        • Webster MW
        Causes of stroke in carotid endarterectomy.
        Surgery. 1982; 92: 634-639
        • String ST
        • Callahan A
        The critical manipulable variable of hemispheric low flow during carotid surgery.
        Surgery. 1983; 93: 46-49
        • Whittemore AD
        • Kauffman JL
        • Kohler TR
        • Mannick JA
        Routine electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring during carotid endarterectomy.
        Ann Surg. 1983; 197: 707-713
        • Littooy FN
        • Halstuk KS
        • Mamdani M
        • Calandra D
        • Hayes AC
        • Baker WH
        Factors influencing morbidity of carotid endarterectomy without a shunt.
        Am Surg. 1984; 50: 350-353
        • Perdue GD
        Management of postendarterectomy neurologic deficits.
        Arch Surg. 1982; 117: 1079-1081
        • Rosenthal D
        • Zeichner WD
        • Lamis PA
        • Stanton PE
        Neurologic deficit after carotid endarterectomy: pathogenesis and management.
        Surgery. 1983; 94: 776-780
        • Jernigan WR
        • Fulton RL
        • Hamman JL
        • Miller FB
        • Mani SS
        The efficiacy of routine completion operative angiography in reducing the incidence of perioperative stroke associated with carotid endarterectomy.
        Surgery. 1984; 96: 831-837
        • Morawetz RB
        • Zeiger HE
        • McDowell HA
        • et al.
        Correlation of cerebral blood flow and EEG during carotid occlusion for endarterectomy (without shunting) and neurologic outcome.
        Surgery. 1984; 96: 184-189
        • Ott DA
        • Cooley DA
        • Chapa L
        • Coelho A
        Carotid endarterectomy without temporary intraluminal shunt.
        Ann Surg. 1980; 191: 708-713
        • Whittney DG
        • Kahn EM
        • Estes JW
        • Jones CE
        Carotid artery surgery without a temporary indwelling shunt.
        Arch Surg. 1980; 115: 1393-1399
        • Hafner CD
        • Evans WE
        Carotid endarterectomy with local anesthesia: results and advantages.
        J Vasc Surg. 1988; 7: 232-239
        • Sundt TM
        • Ebersold MJ
        • Sharbrough FW
        • Piepgras DG
        • Marsh WR
        • Messick JM
        The risk-benefit ratio of intraoperative shunting during carotid endarterectomy.
        Ann Surg. 1986; 203: 196-204
        • Nuwer MR
        Use of somatosensory-evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring of cerebral and spinal cord function.
        Neurol Clin. 1988; 6: 881-897
        • Jacobs LA
        • Brinkman SD
        • Morrell RM
        • Shirley JG
        • Ganji S
        Long-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy.
        Am Surg. 1983; 49: 338-344
        • Markland ON
        • Dilley RS
        • Moorthy SS
        • Warren C
        Monitoring of somatosensory-evoked responses during carotid endarterectomy.
        Arch Neurol. 1984; 41: 375-378
        • McPherson RW
        • Johnson RM
        • Graf M
        Intraoperative neurological monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: electroencephalogram versus somatosensory-evoked potential.
        Anesthesiology. 1983; 59 ([Abstract]): 368
        • Russ W
        • Thiel A
        • Moosdorf R
        • Hempelmann G
        Somatosensorisch evozierte Potentiale bei desobliterierenden Eingriffen an der Carotisgabel.
        Klin Wochenschr. 1988; 66 (suppl): 35-40
        • De Vleeschauwer PH
        • Horsch S
        • Matamoros R
        Monitoring of somatosensory-evoked potentials in carotid surgery: results, usefulness and limitations of the method.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 1988; 2: 63-68
        • Prior PF
        EEG monitoring and evoked potentials in brain ischemia.
        Br J Anaesth. 1985; 57: 63-81