Advertisement
Original communication| Volume 114, ISSUE 5, P921-927, November 1993

Clinical significance of routine of iliac and calf veins by color flow duplex scanning in patients suspected of having acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

  • Louis M. Messina
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: Louis M. Messina, MD, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Room 2210L Taubman Health Care Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0329.
    Affiliations
    From the Diagnostic Vascular Laboratory, Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mary S. Sarpa
    Affiliations
    From the Diagnostic Vascular Laboratory, Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mary A. Smith
    Affiliations
    From the Diagnostic Vascular Laboratory, Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lazar J. Greenfield
    Affiliations
    From the Diagnostic Vascular Laboratory, Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Background. Because duplex ultrasonography is used increasingly to evaluate patients suspected of having acute deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity, the clinical significance of limiting venous duplex scanning to the common femoral, superficial femoral, and popliteal veins becomes an important question.
      Methods. We prospectively studied by venous color flow duplex ultrasonography 181 patients referred for evaluation to rule out acute deep venous thrombosis to determine (1) the frequency with which the iliac and calf veins could be imaged adequately to determine the presence or absence of acute deep venous thrombosis, (2) the frequency of acute venous thrombosis in these venous segments, and (3) the time required to scan these additional segments.
      Results. In 79% of the patients studied, one segment of the iliac venous system was imaged adequately to determine the presence or absence of venous thrombosis. In the lower extremity, the common femoral vein, the superficial femoral vein, and the popliteal vein were imaged adequately in 94% of the patients. In 76% of the patients all three calf veins were imaged adequately to determine whether acute deep venous thrombosis was present or absent. The anterior tibial vein was the most difficult vein to image consistently and was imaged adequately in 76% of the patients referred. The mean time to scan the affected limb was 8 minutes 37 seconds. Forty-seven patients (26%) of the 180 patients studied had positive venous scans. Twenty-three percent of the patients who had positive scans were found to have iliac vein involvement. Thirty-two percent who had positive venous scans were found to have thrombosis of the calf veins. Fifteen percent of the 47 patients who had positive scans had either an isolated iliac or calf vein thrombosis.
      Conclusions. We believe this frequency of isolated iliac or calf vein thrombosis coupled with the frequency of successful imaging of these venous segments and the short additional time required to image these segments justifies the inclusion of routine imaging of the iliac and calf veins in patients undergoing venous duplex scanning to rule out acute deep venous thrombosis.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Haeger K
        Problems of acute deep venous thrombosis.
        Angiology. 1969; 20: 219-223
        • Aitken AGF
        • Godden DJ
        Real-time ultrasound diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: a comparison of venography.
        Clinical Radiology. 1987; 38: 309-313
        • White RH
        • McGahan JP
        • Daschback
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis using duplex ultrasound.
        Ann Intern Med. 1989; 111: 297-304
        • Killewich LA
        • Bedford GR
        • Beach KW
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis: a prospective study comparing duplex scanning to contrast venography.
        Circulation. 1989; 79: 810-814
        • Lensing AWA
        • Prandoni P
        • Brandjes D
        • et al.
        Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography.
        N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 342-345
        • Nix ML
        • Nelson CL
        • Harmon BH
        • et al.
        Duplex venous scanning: image vs Doppler accuracy.
        J Vasc Tech. 1989; 12: 121-126
        • Cronan JJ
        • Dorfman GS
        • Grusmark J
        Lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis: further experience with and refinements of US assessment.
        Radiology. 1988; 168: 101-107
        • Sarpa MS
        • Messina LM
        • Smith M
        • et al.
        Reliability of venous duplex scanning to image the iliac veins and to diagnose iliac vein thrombosis in patients suspected of having acute deep venous thrombosis.
        J Vasc Tech. 1991; 15: 299-302
        • Rose SC
        • Zwiebel WJ
        • Nelson BD
        • et al.
        Symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: accuracy, limitations, and role of color duplex flow imaging in diagnosis.
        Radiology. 1990; 175: 639-644
        • Moreno-Cabral R
        • Kistner RL
        • Nordyke RA
        Importance of calf vein thrombophlebitis.
        Surgery. 1976; 80: 735-742
        • Havig O
        Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. An autopsy study with multiple regression analysis of possible risk factors.
        Acta Chir Scand. 1977; 478 (suppl): 1-20
        • Barnes RW
        • Nix ML
        • Barnes CL
        • et al.
        Perioperative asymptomatic venous thrombosis: role of duplex scanning versus venography.
        J Vasc Surg. 1989; 9: 251-260
        • Polak JF
        • Culter SS
        • O'Leary DH
        Deep veins of the calf: assessment with color Doppler flow imaging.
        Radiology. 1989; 171: 481-485
        • Naidich JB
        • Feinberg AW
        • Karp-Harman H
        • et al.
        Contrast venography: reassessment of its role.
        Radiology. 1988; 168: 97-100
        • Hull R
        • Hirsh J
        • Sackett DL
        • et al.
        Replacement of venography in suspected venous thrombosis by impedance plethysmography and I-fibrinogen leg scanning.
        Ann Intern Med. 1981; 94: 12-15
        • Dure-Smith P
        • Tison JB
        Ilio-femoral segment and inferior vena cava visualization using a non-catheter technique: an adjunct of leg phlebography.
        Radiology. 1984; 153: 251-252
        • Redman HC
        Deep venous thrombosis: Is contrast venography still the diagnostic “gold standard”?.
        Radiology. 1988; 168: 277-278
        • O'Donnell Jr, TF
        • Abbott WM
        • Athanasoulis CA
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in the outpatient by venography.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980; 150: 69-74
        • Cronan JJ
        • Leen V
        Recurrent deep venous thrombosis: limitations of US.
        Radiology. 1989; 170: 739-742