Advertisement
Central Surgical Association| Volume 114, ISSUE 4, P659-666, October 1993

Download started.

Ok

Comparison of distal and proximal splenorenal shunts: A ten-year experience

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Background. This study evaluated the effectiveness of distal (DSRS) versus the central or proximal (PSRS) splenorenal shunts in the elective treatment of bleeding varices.
      Methods. A series of 48 patients with portal hypertension and established variceal bleeding mere randomized to undergo PSRS or DSRS. Preoperative evaluation included endoscopic examination, angiography, serum amino acid profile, liver chemistry studies, and neurologic evaluation. Any patient with significant ascites and hepatofugal flow underwent PSRS shunt procedures; the remainder were randomized prospectively.
      Results. Between 1979 and 1989, 29 patients underwent PSRS and 19 underwent DSRS. The mean length of follow-up was 48 months. The groups were equivalent with regard to age, gender, Child's class, number of preoperative bleeds, and cause of disease. No difference was found in any of the factors measured. In particular there were no differences in the operative mortality rate (17% PSRS; 11% DSRS), 5-year survival rate (52% PSRS; 52% DSRS), rebleeding (34% PSRS; 32% DSRS), shunt occlusion (7% PSRS; 11% DSRS), development of individual episodes of postoperative encephalopathy (28% PSRS; 26% DSRS), chronic postoperative encephalopathy (17% PSRS; 11% DSRS), or mean branched-chain/aromatic amino acid ratios (PSRS = 0.88 ± 0.05; DSRS = 0.66 ± 0.05).
      Conclusions. The results do not support the contention that DSRS is associated with either greater survival or less encephalopathy than PSRS.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Reichle FA
        • Fahmy WF
        • Golsorkhi M
        Prospective comparative trial with distal splenorenal and mesocaval shunts.
        Am J Surg. 1979; 137: 13-21
        • Fischer JE
        • Bower RH
        • Atamian S
        • Welling R
        Comparison of distal and proximal splenorenal shunts: a randomized prospective trial.
        Ann Surg. 1981; 194: 531-544
        • Millikan Jr, WJ
        • Warren WD
        • Henderson JM
        • et al.
        The Emory prospective randomized trial: selective versus nonselective shunt to control variceal bleeding. Ten-year follow-up.
        Ann Surg. 1985; 201: 712-722
        • Langer B
        • Taylor BR
        • MacKenzie DR
        • et al.
        Further report of a prospective randomized trial comparing distal splenorenal shunt with end-to-side portacaval shunt.
        Gastroenterology. 1985; 88: 424-429
        • daSilva LC
        • Strauss E
        • Gayotto LCC
        • et al.
        A randomized trial for the study of the elective surgical treatment of portal hypertension in mansonic schistosomiasis.
        Ann Surg. 1986; 204: 148-153
        • Harley HAJ
        • Morgan T
        • Redeker AG
        • et al.
        Results of a randomized trial of end-to-side portacaval shunt and distal splenorenal shunt in alcoholic liver disease and variceal bleeding.
        Gastroenterology. 1986; 91: 802-809
        • Grace ND
        • Conn HO
        • Resnick RH
        • et al.
        Distal splenorenal vs. portal-systemic shunts after hemorrhage from varices: a randomized controlled trial.
        Hepatology. 1988; 8: 1475-1481
        • Spina GP
        • Galeotti F
        • Opocher E
        • et al.
        Selective distal splenorenal shunt versus side-to-side portacaval shunt: clinical results of a prospective, controlled study.
        Am J Surg. 1988; 155: 564-571
        • Linton RR
        • Ellis DS
        Emergency and definitive treatment of bleeding esophageal varices.
        JAMA. 1956; 160: 1017-1023
        • Warren WD
        • Zeppa R
        • Fomon JJ
        Selective trans-splenic decompression of gastro-esophageal varices by distal splenorenal shunt.
        Ann Surg. 1967; 166: 437-455
        • Peto R
        • Pike MC
        • Armitage P
        • et al.
        Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples.
        Br J Cancer. 1977; 35: 1-33
        • Rikkers LF
        Bleeding esophageal varices.
        Surg Clin North Am. 1987; 67: 475-488
        • Henderson JM
        • Kutner MH
        • Millikan Jr, WJ
        • et al.
        Endoscopic variceal sclerosis compared with distal splenorenal shunt to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a prospective randomized trial.
        Ann Intern Med. 1990; 112: 262-269
        • Rikkers LF
        • Jin G
        • Burnett DA
        • Buchi KW
        • Cormier RA
        Shunt surgery versus endoscopic sclerotherapy for variceal hemorrhage: late results of a randomized trial.
        Am J Surg. 1993; 165: 27-33
        • Ring EJ
        • Lake JR
        • Roberts JP
        • et al.
        Using transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts to control variceal bleeding before liver transplantation.
        Ann Intern Med. 1992; 116: 304-309
        • Maillard JN
        • Flamant YM
        • Hay JM
        • et al.
        Selectivity of the distal splenorenal shunt.
        Surgery. 1979; 86: 663-671
        • Henderson JM
        • Millikan WJ
        • Wright-Bacon L
        • Kutner MH
        • Warren WD
        Hemodynamic differences between alcoholic and nonalcoholic cirrhotics following distal splenorenal shunt: effect on survival?.
        Ann Surg. 1983; 198: 325-334
        • Henderson JM
        • Warren WD
        • Millikan WJ
        • Galloway JR
        • Kawasaki S
        • Kutner MH
        Distal splenorenal shunt with splenopancreatic disconnection: a four year assessment.
        Ann Surg. 1989; 210: 332-341
        • Linton RR
        • Ellis DS
        • Geary JE
        Critical comparative analysis of early and late results of splenorenal and direct portacaval shunts performed on 169 patients with portal cirrhosis.
        Ann Surg. 1961; 154: 446-459
        • Sarfeh IJ
        • Rypins EB
        • Mason GR
        A systemic appraisal of portacaval H-graft diameters: clinical and hemodynamic perspectives.
        Ann Surg. 1986; 204: 356-364
        • Rypins EB
        • Sarfeh IJ
        Influence of portal hemodynamics on long-term survival of alcoholic cirrhosis patients after small-diameter portacaval H graft.
        Am J Surg. 1988; 155: 152-158
        • Paquet KJ
        • Mercado MA
        • Gad HA
        Surgical procedures for bleeding esophagogastric varices when sclerotherapy fails: a prospective study.
        Am J Surg. 1990; 160: 43-47
        • Bismuth H
        • Adam R
        • Mathur S
        • Sherlock D
        Options for elective treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients in the transplantation era.
        Am J Surg. 1990; 160: 105-110
        • Lodge JP
        • Mavor AI
        • Giles GR
        Does the Warren shunt correct hypersplenism?.
        Hepatobil Surg. 1990; 2: 41-49