Advertisement
Central Surgical Association| Volume 114, ISSUE 4, P843-849, October 1993

Download started.

Ok

Effect of failed computed tomography-guided and endoscopic drainage on pancreatic pseudocyst management

  • Robert Rao
    Affiliations
    From the Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill., USA

    From Surgery Service, Hines Veterans Administration Hospital, Maywood, Ill., USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ihor Fedorak
    Affiliations
    From the Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill., USA

    From Surgery Service, Hines Veterans Administration Hospital, Maywood, Ill., USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Richard A. Prinz
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: Richard A. Prinz, MD, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S. First Ave., Maywood, IL 60153.
    Affiliations
    From the Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill., USA

    From Surgery Service, Hines Veterans Administration Hospital, Maywood, Ill., USA
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Background. Computed tomography and endoscopic drainage are used increasingly to treat pancreatic pseudocysts (PP). We reviewed our experience with PP to compare the outcomes of patients operated on initially (group 1) with those whose nonoperative treatment failed (computed tomography-guided or endoscopic drainage) before operation (group 2).
      Methods. The records of 70 consecutive patients operated on for PP were reviewed. The 52 patients (74%) in group 1 and 18 (26%) in group 2 were compared in terms of clinical features, laboratory lest results on examination and before operation, operative findings, morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates.
      Results. Before the initial drainage attempt, mean serum amylase level was higher in group 2 (542 ± 25 vs 163 ± 17 IU/L; p = 0.01). All other laboratory values were similar. Before operative drainage, group 2 patients had lower hemoglobin (10.7 ± 0.5 vs 12.2 ± 0.3 gm/dl; p < 0.05) and serum albumin level (2.7 ± 0.2 vs 3.5 ±0.1 mg/dl; p < 0.01) than group 1. Morbidity was twice as frequent in group 2 (33% vs 14%). The time from initial attempt at drainage to PP resolution was longer in group 2 (104 ± 36 vs 20 ± 4 days; p = 0.01). However, the time from operation to resolution was similar in both groups (21 ± 8 vs 20 + 4 days).
      Conclusions. Failed nonoperative drainage is associated with a protracted illness and carries a risk of increased morbidity after operative intervention.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wade J
        Twenty-five year experience with pancreatic pseudocysts: are we making progress.
        Am J Surg. 1985; 149: 705-708
        • Aranha GV
        • Prinz RA
        • Esguerra A
        • Greenlee HB
        The nature and course of cystic pancreatic lesions diagnosed by ultrasound.
        Arch Surg. 1983; 118: 486-488
        • Warshaw AL
        • Rattner DW
        Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst.
        Ann Surg. 1985; 202: 720-724
        • Kiviluoto T
        • Kivisaari L
        • Kivilaakso E
        • Lempinen M
        Pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis: surgical results in 102 consecutive patients.
        Arch Surg. 1989; 124: 240-243
        • Ephgrave K
        • Hunt JL
        Presentation of pancreatic pseudocysts: implications for timing of surgical intervention.
        Am J Surg. 1986; 151: 749-775
        • Bradley III, EL
        Don't fix nothin' that ain't broke [Editorial].
        Am J Surg. 1985; 149: 197
        • Torres WE
        • Evert MB
        • Baumgartner BR
        • Bernadino ME
        Percutaneous aspiration and drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.
        AJR. 1986; 147: 1007-1009
        • Aurell Y
        • Forsberg L
        • Hederstroöm E
        • Anderson R
        Percutaneous puncture and drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a retrospective study.
        Acta Radiol. 1990; 31: 177-180
        • Criado E
        • DeStefano AA
        • Weiner TM
        • Jaques PE
        Long term results of percutaneous catheter drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992; 175: 293-298
        • Adams DB
        • Harvey TS
        • Anderson ML
        Percutaneous catheter drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.
        Am Surg. 1991; 57: 29-33
        • Van Sonnenburg E
        • Wittich GR
        • Casola G
        • et al.
        Percutaneous drainage of infected and noninfected pancreatic pseudocysts: experience in 101 cases.
        Radiology. 1989; 170: 757-761
        • Kozarek RA
        • Ball TJ
        • Patterson DJ
        • Freeny DC
        • Ryan JA
        • Traverso LW
        Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections.
        Gastroenterology. 1991; 100: 1362-1370
        • Cremer M
        • Deviere J
        • Engelholm L
        Endoscopic management of cysts and pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis: long term follow up after 7 years of experience.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 1989; 35: 1-9
        • Kozarek RA
        • Brayko GM
        • Harlan T
        • Sankowski RA
        • Cintora I
        • Kovac A
        Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 1985; 31: 322-328
        • Adams DB
        • Anderson MC
        Percutaneous catheter drainage compared with internal drainage in the management of pancreatic pseudocyst.
        Ann Surg. 1992; 215: 571-578
        • Nealon WH
        • Townsend CM
        • Thompson JC
        Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatic pseudocyst associated with resolving acute and chronic pancreatitis.
        Ann Surg. 1989; 209: 532-540
        • Munn JS
        • Aranha GV
        • Greenlee HB
        • Prinz RA
        Simultaneous treatment of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic pseudocyst.
        Arch Surg. 1987; 122: 662-667