Research Article| Volume 113, ISSUE 6, P599-602, June 1993

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Current status and controversies

  • James M. Becker
    Reprint requests: James M. Becker, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery, Chief, Division of General and, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115.
    Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass., USA
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • McHugh S.M.
        • Diamant N.E.
        • McLeod R.
        • Cohen Z.
        S-pouches versus J-pouches. a comparison of functional outcomes.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1987; 30: 671-677
        • Tuckson W.B.
        • Fazio V.W.
        Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1991; 34: 17-21
        • Sagar P.M.
        • Holdsworth P.J.
        • Godwin P.G.
        • Quirke P.
        • Smith A.N.
        • Johnston D.
        Comparison of triplicated (S) and quaduplicated (W) pelvic ileal reserviors: studies on manpower fecal bacteriology, morphology, and functional results.
        Gastroenterology. 1992; 102: 520-528
        • Becker J.M.
        • McGrath K.M.
        • Meagher M.P.
        • Parodi J.E.
        • Dunnegan D.A.
        • Soper N.J.
        Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
        Surgery. 1991; 110: 718-725
        • Pezim M.E.
        • Pemberton J.H.
        • Beart R.W.
        • et al.
        Outcome of “indeterminant” colitis following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1989; 32: 653-658
        • Becker J.M.
        • Parodi J.E.
        Total colectomy with preservation of the anal sphincter.
        Surg Annu. 1989; 21: 263-302
        • Pemberton J.H.
        • Kelly K.A.
        • Beart Jr, R.W.
        • Dozois R.R.
        • Wolff B.G.
        • Ilstrup D.M.
        Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.
        in: Long-term results. 110th ed. Ann Surg. 206. 1987: 504-513
        • Becker J.M.
        • Raymond J.L.
        Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single surgeon's experience with 100 consecutive cases.
        Ann Surg. 1986; 204: 375-383
        • Martin L.W.
        • Fischer J.E.
        Preservation of anorectal continence following total colectomy.
        Ann Surg. 1982; 196: 700-704
        • Sugarman H.J.
        • Newsome H.H.
        • DeCosta G.
        • Zfass A.M.
        Stapled ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis without a temporary diverting ileostomy.
        Ann Surg. 1991; 213: 606-617
        • Seow-Choen
        • Tsunoda A.
        • Nicholls R.J.
        Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy versus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy.
        Br J Surg. 1991; 78: 430-434
        • Ambroze W.L.
        • Pemberton J.H.
        • Dozois R.
        • Carpenter H.A.
        • O'Rourke J.S.
        • Ilstrup D.M.
        The histological pattern and pathological involvement of the anal transition zone in patients with ulcerative colitis.
        Gastroenterology. 1993; 104: 514-518
        • Rombeau J.L.
        Operative and perioperative treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.
        Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. 1992; 8: 694-702
        • Zenilman M.E.
        • Soper N.J.
        • Dunnegan D.
        • Becker J.M.
        Previous abdominal colectomy affects functional results after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
        World J Surg. 1990; 14: 594-599
        • Galandiuk S.
        • Pemberton J.H.
        • Tsao J.
        • Ilstrup D.M.
        • Wolff B.G.
        Delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis complications and functional results.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1991; 34: 775-778