Advertisement

Escalation of care and failure to rescue: A multicenter, multiprofessional qualitative study

Published:February 10, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.01.016

      Background

      The escalation of care process has not been explored in surgery, despite the role of communication failures in adverse events. This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework of the influences on escalation of care in surgery allowing solutions to facilitate management of sick patients to be developed.

      Methods

      A multicenter qualitative study was conducted in three hospitals in London, UK. A total of 41 participants were recruited, including 16 surgeons, 11 surgical PGY1s, six surgical nurses, four intensivists, and four critical care outreach team members. Participants were submitted to semistructured interviews that were analyzed using grounded theory methodology.

      Results

      A decision to escalate was based upon five key themes: patient, individual, team, environmental, and organizational factors. Most participants felt that supervision and escalation of care were problematic in their hospital, with unclear escalation protocols and poor availability of senior surgical staff the most common concerns. Mobile phones and direct conversation were identified to be more effective when escalating care than hospital pager systems. Transparent escalation protocols, increased senior clinician supervision, and communication skills training were highlighted as strategies to improve escalation of care.

      Conclusion

      This is the first study to describe escalation of care in surgery, a key process for protecting the safety of deteriorating surgical patients. Factors affecting the decision to escalate are complex, involving clinical and professional aspects of care. An understanding of this process could pave the way for interventions to facilitate escalation in order to improve patient outcome.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Finks J.F.
        • Osborne N.H.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2128-2137
        • Healey M.A.
        • Shackford S.R.
        • Osler T.M.
        • Rogers F.B.
        • Burns E.
        Complications in surgical patients.
        Arch Surg. 2002; 137 (discussion 617-8): 611-617
        • Ghaferi A.A.
        • Osborne N.H.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Dimick J.B.
        Hospital characteristics associated with failure to rescue from complications after pancreatectomy.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 211: 325-330
        • Symons N.R.
        • Almoudaris A.M.
        • Nagpal K.
        • Vincent C.A.
        • Moorthy K.
        An observational study of the frequency, severity, and etiology of failures in postoperative care after major elective general surgery.
        Ann Surg. 2013; 257: 1-5
        • Silber J.H.
        • Williams S.V.
        • Krakauer H.
        • Schwartz J.S.
        Hospital and patient characteristics associated with death after surgery. A study of adverse occurrence and failure to rescue.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: 615-629
        • Ghaferi A.A.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Dimick J.B.
        Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients.
        Ann Surg. 2009; 250: 1029-1034
        • Henneman D.
        • Snijders H.S.
        • Fiocco M.
        • van Leersum N.J.
        • Kolfschoten N.E.
        • Wiggers T.
        • et al.
        Hospital variation in failure to rescue after colorectal cancer surgery: results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20: 2117-2123
        • Ghaferi A.A.
        • Dimick J.B.
        Variation in mortality after high-risk cancer surgery: failure to rescue.
        Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012; 21 (vii): 389-395
        • Moriarty J.P.
        • Finnie D.M.
        • Johnson M.G.
        • Huddleston J.M.
        • Naessens J.M.
        Do pre-existing complications affect the failure to rescue quality measures?.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19: 65-68
        • Nagpal K.
        • Arora S.
        • Vats A.
        • Wong H.W.
        • Sevdalis N.
        • Vincent C.
        • et al.
        Failures in communication and information transfer across the surgical care pathway: interview study.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21: 843-849
        • Sydor D.T.
        • Bould M.D.
        • Naik V.N.
        • Burjorjee J.
        • Arzola C.
        • Hayter M.
        • et al.
        Challenging authority during a life-threatening crisis: the effect of operating theatre hierarchy.
        Br J Anaesth. 2013; 110: 463-471
        • Kennedy T.J.
        • Regehr G.
        • Baker G.R.
        • Lingard L.
        Preserving professional credibility: grounded theory study of medical trainees' requests for clinical support.
        BMJ. 2009; 338: b128
        • Robb G.
        • Seddon M.
        A multi-faceted approach to the physiologically unstable patient.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19: e47
        • Bapoje S.R.
        • Gaudiani J.L.
        • Narayanan V.
        • Albert R.K.
        Unplanned transfers to a medical intensive care unit: causes and relationship to preventable errors in care.
        J Hosp Med. 2011; 6: 68-72
        • Cioffi J.
        • Salter C.
        • Wilkes L.
        • Vonu-Boriceanu O.
        • Scott J.
        Clinicians' responses to abnormal vital signs in an emergency department.
        Aust Crit Care. 2006; 19: 66-72
        • Kehlet H.
        • Mythen M.
        Why is the surgical high-risk patient still at risk?.
        Br J Anaesth. 2011; 106: 289-291
        • Mays N.
        • Pope C.
        Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research.
        BMJ. 2000; 320: 50-52
        • Calland J.F.
        • Guerlain S.
        • Adams R.B.
        • Tribble C.G.
        • Foley E.
        • Chekan E.G.
        A systems approach to surgical safety.
        Surg Endosc. 2002; 16 (discussion 1015): 1005-1014
      1. Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry, 2013. Available from: http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/report.

        • Mackintosh N.
        • Sandall J.
        Overcoming gendered and professional hierarchies in order to facilitate escalation of care in emergency situations: the role of standardised communication protocols.
        Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71: 1683-1686
        • Reason J.
        Human error: models and management.
        BMJ. 2000; 320: 768-770
        • Breen K.J.
        • Hogan A.M.
        • Mealy K.
        The detrimental impact of the implementation of the European working time directive (EWTD) on surgical senior house officer (SHO) operative experience.
        Ir J Med Sci. 2013; 182: 383-387
        • Lonergan P.E.
        • Mulsow J.
        • Tanner W.A.
        • Traynor O.
        • Tierney S.
        Analysing the operative experience of basic surgical trainees in Ireland using a web-based logbook.
        BMC Med Educ. 2011; 11: 70

      Linked Article

      • Commentary on: Escalation of care and failure to rescue: A multicenter, multiprofessional qualitative study
        SurgeryVol. 155Issue 6
        • Preview
          Failure-to-rescue (FTR), initially defined by Silber et al1 in 1992 as hospital deaths occurring after adverse events in operative patients, has been used as a measure of patient safety and hospital quality. In most studies to improve the rates of FTR mortality, authors have examined the response of organizational resources to improve rescue once a patient has been identified to be in crisis. It is now recognized, however, that most patients manifest signs and symptoms of clinical deterioration during a substantial period of time before a crisis occurs; accordingly, contemporary studies increasingly have focused on processes that precede a FTR crisis—what has been referred to as the “afferent limb of rapid response systems.”2
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
      • Commentary on: Escalation of care and failure to rescue: A multicenter, multiprofessional, qualitative study
        SurgeryVol. 155Issue 6
        • Preview
          In the article “Escalation of Care and Failure to Rescue: A multicenter, multiprofessional, qualitative study,” the authors evaluate escalation of care and failure to rescue from the standpoint of barriers to effectiveness. The authors are to be congratulated on examining an important area that reveals tremendous opportunity to improve and sends a message in particular to senior residents and faculty in teaching hospitals.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF