Advertisement

Surgical never events and contributing human factors

      Introduction

      We report the first prospective analysis of human factors elements contributing to invasive procedural never events by using a validated Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS).

      Methods

      From August 2009 to August 2014, operative and invasive procedural “Never Events” (retained foreign object, wrong site/side procedure, wrong implant, wrong procedure) underwent systematic causation analysis promptly after the event. Contributing human factors were categorized using the 4 levels of error causation described by Reason and 161 HFACS subcategories (nano-codes).

      Results

      During the study, approximately 1.5 million procedures were performed, during which 69 never events were identified. A total of 628 contributing human factors nano-codes were identified. Action-based errors (n = 260) and preconditions to actions (n = 296) accounted for the majority of the nano-codes across all 4 types of events, with individual cognitive factors contributing one half of the nano-codes. The most common action nano-codes were confirmation bias (n = 36) and failed to understand (n = 36). The most common precondition nano-codes were channeled attention on a single issue (n = 33) and inadequate communication (n = 30).

      Conclusion

      Targeting quality and interventions in system improvement addressing cognitive factors and team resource management as well as perceptual biases may decrease errors and further improve patient safety. These results delineate targets to further decrease never events from our health care system.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Tichansky D.
        • Morton J.
        • Jones D.
        The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes, and Patient Safety.
        Springer, New York2012
      1. Serious Reportable Events In Healthcare—2011 Update: A Consensus Report. National Quality Forum, Washington, DC2011
      2. The Joint Commission. Sentinel Event Policy and Procedures. 2013. Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/Sentinel_Event_Policy_and_Procedures/default.aspx.

        • Vincent C.
        Understanding and responding to adverse events.
        N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1051-1056
        • Mehtsun W.T.
        • Ibrahim A.M.
        • Diener-West M.
        • Pronovost P.J.
        • Makary M.A.
        Surgical never events in the United States.
        Surgery. 2013; 153: 465-472
      3. Provisional publication of never events reported as occurring between 1 April and 31 October 2014. AMA News, London2014
        • Stahel P.F.
        • Sabel A.L.
        • Victoroff M.S.
        • Varnell J.
        • Lembitz A.
        • Boyle D.J.
        • et al.
        Wrong-site and wrong-patient procedures in the universal protocol era: analysis of a prospective database of physician self-reported occurrences.
        Arch Surg. 2010; 145: 978-984
        • Hallbeck M.S.
        • Koneczny S.
        • Büchel D.
        • Matern U.
        Ergonomic usability testing of operating room devices.
        Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008; 132: 147-152
        • Reason J.
        Human error: models and management.
        BMJ. 2000; 320: 768-770
        • Perrow C.
        Living with high-risk technologies.
        Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ1999
        • Haynes A.B.
        • Weiser T.G.
        • Berry W.R.
        • Lipsitz S.R.
        • Breizat A.-H.S.
        • Dellinger E.P.
        • et al.
        A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 491-499
        • Hu Y.-Y.
        • Greenberg C.C.
        Patient safety in surgical oncology: perspective from the operating room.
        Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012; 21: 467-478
        • Wu A.W.
        • Lipshutz A.K.
        • Pronovost P.J.
        Effectiveness and efficiency of root cause analysis in medicine.
        JAMA. 2008; 299: 685-687
        • Wiegmann D.
        • Shappell S.
        Human error approach to aviation accident analysis: the human factors analysis and classification system.
        Ashgate, Aldershot, 2003
        • Olsen N.S.
        • Shorrock S.T.
        Evaluation of the HFACS-ADF safety classification system: inter-coder consensus and intra-coder consistency.
        Accid Anal Prev. 2010; 42: 437-444
        • Diller T.
        • Helmrich G.
        • Dunning S.
        • Cox S.
        • Buchanan A.
        • Shappell S.
        The Human Factors Analysis Classification System (HFACS) applied to health care.
        Am J Med Qual. 2014; 29: 181-190
        • ElBardissi A.W.
        • Wiegmann D.A.
        • Dearani J.A.
        • Daly R.C.
        • Sundt T.M.
        Application of the human factors analysis and classification system methodology to the cardiovascular surgery operating room.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83: 1412-1418
        • Kohn L.
        • Corrigan J.
        • Donaldson M.
        To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System.
        National Academy Press, Washington, DC1999
        • Landrigan C.P.
        • Parry G.J.
        • Bones C.B.
        • Hackbarth A.D.
        • Goldmann D.A.
        • Sharek P.J.
        Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 2124-2134
        • Cuschieri A.
        Nature of human error: implications for surgical practice.
        Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 642-648
        • Cima R.R.
        • Kollengode A.
        • Clark J.
        • Pool S.
        • Weisbrod C.
        • Amstutz G.J.
        • et al.
        Using a data-matrix-coded sponge counting system across a surgical practice: impact after 18 months.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011; 37: 51-58
        • Hariharan D.
        • Lobo D.N.
        Retained surgical sponges, needles and instruments.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013; 95: 87-92
        • Lowndes B.
        • Hallbeck M.
        The use of human factors and ergonomics to promote safety and efficiency in the operating room, with an emphasis on minimally invasive surgery.
        Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind. 2014; 24: 308-317
        • Xiao Y.
        • Jones A.
        • Zhang B.B.
        • Bennett M.
        • Mears S.C.
        • Mabrey J.D.
        • et al.
        Team consistency and occurrences of prolonged operative time, prolonged hospital stay, and hospital readmission: a retrospective analysis.
        World J Surg. 2015; 39: 890-896
        • Mattett R.
        • Conroy M.
        • Saslaw L.Z.
        • Moffatt-Bruce S.
        Preventing wrong site, procedure, and patient events using a common cause analysis.
        Am J Med Qual. 2012; 27: 21-29