Advertisement
Central Surgical Association| Volume 128, ISSUE 4, P604-612, October 2000

Download started.

Ok

Primary gastrointestinal sarcomas: Analysis of prognostic factors and results of surgical management

      Abstract

      Background. This study was done to review the clinical presentation, surgical management, and prognostic factors for primary gastrointestinal sarcomas. Methods. We reviewed medical records of 55 patients who were treated for primary gastrointestinal sarcomas from 1981 through 1996. Mean follow-up time was 32 months. Results. Clinical findings included gastrointestinal bleeding (51%), palpable mass (36%), and abdominal pain (33%). The stomach was the most common site of disease (53%), followed by the small intestine (33%). Tumors were high grade in 76% of patients and low-grade in 24% of patients. Complete resection of all gross disease was accomplished in 35 patients (64%), incomplete resection in 17 patients (31%), and biopsy only in 3 patients (5%). Adjacent organ resection was required in 19 patients (35%). Overall actuarial survival was 22% (median survival, 32 months). Unfavorable prognostic factors were incomplete resection, high-grade histologic features, and tumor size of 5 cm or more (P <.05). En bloc resection of contiguous organs did not adversely effect survival. In patients with complete resections, tumor grade was the most important prognostic factor (median survival, 55 months vs 19 months for low-grade vs high-grade tumors; P <.05). Conclusions. Aggressive surgical resection, including en bloc resection of locally advanced tumors, appears warranted. Despite complete resections, patients with high-grade tumors remain at risk for recurrence. (Surgery 2000;128:604-12.)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Greenlee RT
        • Murray T
        • Bolden S
        • Wingo PA
        Cancer statistics, 2000.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2000; 50: 7-33
        • Miettinen M
        • Sarlomo-Rikala M
        • Lasota J
        Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recent advances in understanding of their biology.
        Hum Pathol. 1999; 30: 1213-1220
        • Basson MD
        • Modlin IM
        • Flynn SD
        Current clinical and pathologic perspectives on gastric stromal tumors.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992; 175: 477-489
        • Hajdu SI
        • Shiu MH
        • Brennan MF
        The role of the pathologist in the management of soft-tissue sarcomas.
        World J Surg. 1988; 12: 326-331
        • Kaplan EL
        • Meier P
        Nonparametic estimation from incomplete observations.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 1958; 53: 457-486
        • Cox DR
        Regression models and life-tables.
        J R State Soc. 1972; 34: 187-220
        • Dougherty MJ
        • Compton C
        • Talbert M
        • Wood WC
        Sarcomas of the gastrointestinal tract: separation into favorable and unfavorable prognostic groups by mitotic count.
        Ann Surg. 1991; 214: 569-574
        • Conlon KC
        • Casper ES
        • Brennan MF
        Primary gastrointestinal sarcomas: analysis of prognostic variables.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 1995; 2: 26-31
        • Chou F
        • Eng H
        • Sheen-Chen S
        Smooth muscle tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: analysis of prognostic factors.
        Surgery. 1996; 119: 171-177
        • Bowers RA
        • Watters CR
        • Szpak CA
        • Meyers WC
        Abdominal leiomyosarcoma: aggressive management.
        South Med J. 1989; 82: 313-317
        • McGrath PC
        • Neifeld JP
        • Lawrence W
        • Kay S
        • Horsley JS
        • Parker GA
        Gastrointestinal sarcomas: analysis of prognostics factors.
        Ann Surg. 1987; 206: 706-710
        • Carson W
        • Karakousis C
        • Douglass H
        • Rao U
        • Palmer ML
        Results of aggressive treatment of gastric sarcoma.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 1994; 1: 244-251
        • Appelman HD
        • Helwig EB
        Sarcomas of the stomach.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1977; 67: 2-10
        • Ng E
        • Pollock RE
        • Munsell MF
        • Atkinson EN
        • Romsdahl MM
        Prognostic factors influencing survival in gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas: implications for surgical management and staging.
        Ann Surg. 1992; 215: 68-77
        • DeMatteo RP
        • Lewis JL
        • Leung D
        • Mudan SS
        • Woodruff JM
        • Brennan MF
        Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival.
        Ann Surg. 2000; 231: 51-58
        • Grant CS
        • Kim CH
        • Farrugia G
        • Zinsmeister A
        • Goellner JR
        Gastric leiomyosarcoma.
        Arch Surg. 1991; 126: 985-990
        • Meijer S
        • Peretz T
        • Gaynor JJ
        • Tan C
        • Hajdu SI
        • Brennan MF
        Primary colorectal sarcoma.
        Arch Surg. 1990; 125: 1163-1168
        • Kimura H
        • Yonemura Y
        • Kadoya N
        • et al.
        Prognostic factors in primary gastrointestinal leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective study.
        World J Surg. 1991; 15: 771-777
        • Zalupski M
        • Metch B
        • Fletcher WS
        • Chapman R
        • Bonnet JD
        • Weiss GR
        • et al.
        Phase III comparison of doxorubicin and dacarbazine given by bolus versus infusion in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991; 83: 926-932