Advertisement
Central Surgical Association| Volume 128, ISSUE 4, P650-659, October 2000

Download started.

Ok

All-artery multigraft coronary artery bypass grafting with only internal thoracic arteries possible and safe: A randomized trial

      Abstract

      Background. The internal thoracic artery (ITA) bypass to the left anterior descending coronary artery is of proven benefit in multigraft coronary artery bypass. Total ITA grafts, if reoperation is averted by avoiding saphenous vein grafts (SVGs), are attractive. The safety of the total ITA graft operation (all-ITA) is a concern. Methods. A randomized trial of multiple-ITA bypass graftings with the use of bilateral sequential ITA without SVGs was performed. Control patients received 1 ITA plus SVG. Inclusion criteria were those used in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study, extended to age 76 years, and any angina class, except emergent. One hundred sixty-two patients were randomized (81 patients per group) from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 1994. Results. Baseline traits were similar as were cross-clamp times, pump times, and number of arteries bypassed (average, 4.3 arteries). Patients who received multiple ITA grafts had no myocardial infarctions, per reference laboratory. One patient died, and 2 patients returned for bleeding. The ITA-SVG group had similar results. The all-ITA group experienced successful completion in 93% of cases. Complications did not differ from control patients. Conclusions. Early and 5-year outcomes were not different between the all-ITA group and the ITA with SVGs group. We believe experienced surgeons can safely extend the ITA to multibypass coronary artery bypass without use of SVG to achieve an all-ITA operation. (Surgery 2000;128:650-9.)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Grondin CM
        • Campeau L
        • Lesperance J
        • Enjalbert M
        • Bourassa MG.
        Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation.
        Circulation. 1984; 70: I208-I212
        • Mills NL
        • Everson CT.
        Vein graft failure.
        Curr Opin Cardiol. 1995; 10: 562-568
        • Cameron A
        • Davis KB
        • Green G
        • Schaff HV.
        Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts-effects on survival over a 15-year period.
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 216-219
        • Cameron A
        • Davis KB
        • Green GE
        • Myers WO
        • Pettinger M.
        Clinical implications of internal mammary artery bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study experience.
        Circulation. 1988; 77: 815-819
        • Lytle BW
        • Blackstone EH
        • Loop FD
        • Houghtaling PL
        • Arnold JH
        • Akhrass R
        • et al.
        Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999; 117: 855-872
        • Sauvage LR
        • Wu H-D
        • Kowalsky TE
        • Davis CC
        • Smith JC
        • Rittenhouse EA
        • et al.
        Healing basis and surgical techniques for complete revascularization of the left ventricle using only the internal mammary arteries.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1986; 42: 449-465
        • Green GE
        • Sosa JA
        • Cameron A.
        Prospective study of feasibility of routine use of multiple internal mammary artery anastomoses.
        J Cardiovasc Surg. 1989; 30: 643-647
        • Myers WO
        • Ray III, JF
        The use of single and multiple internal mammary artery bypass in reoperative coronary bypass surgery: the Marshfield experience.
        in: Cardiac surgery: state of the art reviews. Hanley & Belfus Inc, Philadelphia1992: 375-395 (guest editor)
        • Prineas RJ
        • Crow RS
        • Blackburn H.
        The Minnesota code manual of electrocardiographic findings: standards and procedures for measurement and classification.
        in: PSG Inc, Boston (MA)1982: 1-229
        • Rautaharju PM
        • Calhoun HP
        • Chaitman BR.
        Novacode serial ECG classification system for clinical trials in epidemiologic studies.
        J Electrocardiol. 1992; 24: 179-187
        • Chaitman BR
        • Zhou SH
        • Tamesis B
        • Rosen A
        • Terry AB
        • Zumbehl KM
        • et al.
        Methodology of serial ECG classification using an adaptation of the Novacode for Q wave myocardial infarction in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI).
        J Electrocardiol. 1996; 29: 265-277
        • Sauvage LR
        Extensive myocardial revascularization using only internal thoracic arteries for grafting the anterior descending, circumflex, and right systems.
        in: Cardiac surgery: state of the art reviews. Hanley & Belfus Inc, Philadelphia1992: 397-419 (guest editor)
        • Chaitman BR
        • Alderman EL
        • Sheffield LT
        • Tong T
        • Fisher L
        • Mock MB
        • et al.
        Use of survival analysis to determine the clinical significance of new Q waves after coronary bypass surgery.
        Circulation. 1983; 67: 302-309
        • Jones EL.
        Extended use of the internal mammary-coronary artery bypass.
        J Card Surg. 1986; 1: 13-21
        • Tector AJ
        • Amundsen S
        • Schmahl TM
        • Kress DC
        • Peter M.
        Total revascularization with T grafts.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1994; 57: 33-39
        • Pym J
        • Brown PM
        • Charrette EJP
        • Parker JO
        • West RO.
        Gastroepiploic-coronary anastomosis.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987; 94: 256-259
        • Mills NL
        • Everson CT.
        Right gastroepiploic artery: a third arterial conduit for coronary artery bypass.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1989; 47: 706-711
        • Carpentier A
        • Guermonprez JL
        • Deloche A
        • Frechette C
        • DuBost C.
        The aorta-to-coronary radial artery bypass graft.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1973; 16: 111-121
        • Foster ED
        • Kranc MAT.
        Alternative conduits for aortocoronary bypass grafting.
        Circulation. 1989; 79: I34-I39
        • Borger MA
        • Cohen G
        • Buth KJ
        • Rao V
        • Bozinovski J
        • Liaghati-Nasseri N
        • et al.
        Multiple arterial grafts: radial versus right internal thoracic arteries.
        Circulation. 1998; 98: II714
        • Acar C
        • Jebara VA
        • Portoghese M
        • Beyssen B
        • Pagny JY
        • Grare P
        • et al.
        Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1992; 54: 652-660
        • Pym J
        • Luffman B
        • Parry M.
        Total arterial revascularization of the heart: intentional or inevitable.
        AACN Clin Issues. 1997; 8: 9-19
        • Buxton BF
        • Komeda M
        • Fuller JA
        • Gordon I.
        Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting may improve outcome of coronary artery surgery: risk-adjusted survival.
        Circulation. 1998; 98: II1-II6
        • Cosgrove DM
        • Lytle BW
        • Loop FD
        • Taylor PC
        • Stewart RW
        • Gill CC
        • et al.
        Does bilateral internal mammary artery grafting increase surgical risk?.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988; 95: 850-856
        • Hirotani T
        • Kameda T
        • Kumamoto T
        • Shirota S
        • Yamano M.
        Effects of coronary artery bypass grafting using internal mammary arteries for diabetic patients.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 532-538