In the article “The role of iNOS in wound healing” (Surgery 2001;130:225-9), two authors
were not noted. The byline should be as follows: Han Ping Shi, MD, PhD, Daniel Most,
MD, David T. Efron, MD, U. Tantry, MD, M. H. Fischel, MD, and Adrian Barbul, MD, FACS
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2001 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- The role of iNOS in wound healingSurgeryVol. 130Issue 2
- PreviewBackground. We have previously shown that the blockade of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis impairs wound healing, in particular collagen synthesis. Conversely, impaired wound healing is accompanied by decreased wound NO synthesis. Fibroblast collagen synthesis, proliferation, and fibroblast-mediated matrix contraction are critical to wound healing. We examined the wound healing–related phenotypic changes that are induced by the loss of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) gene function in fibroblasts.
- Full-Text
- Preview
