Advertisement
Ethics| Volume 135, ISSUE 4, P449-451, April 2004

An impaired surgeon, a conflict of interest, and supervisory responsibilities

  • James W. Jones
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: James W. Jones, MD, Center for Health Policy and Medical Ethics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Medical Center, Houston TX 77030.
    Affiliations
    From the The Center for Health Policy and Medical Ethics, Baylor Medical College, Houston, Tex; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Mo USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Laurence B. McCullough
    Affiliations
    From the The Center for Health Policy and Medical Ethics, Baylor Medical College, Houston, Tex; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Mo USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Bruce W. Richman
    Affiliations
    From the The Center for Health Policy and Medical Ethics, Baylor Medical College, Houston, Tex; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Mo USA
    Search for articles by this author
      You are the Chief of Surgery at a major urban medical center. Dr X is a 67-year-old general surgeon who has been your close friend since you were residents. Dr X has had excellent clinical results throughout his long career, but during the last year you have been hearing anecdotal reports from several sources that his behavior has become somewhat erratic. Cases that have been reviewed in the departmental morbidity and mortality conference suggest that his complication rate may have increased slightly during this period. This Monday morning, a surgeon with a well-known long-standing dislike of Dr X has come to your office to report indignantly that he detected the odor of alcohol when Dr X came in for an emergency case the previous afternoon. What should you do?
      • (1)
        Refer the matter to the hospital Chief-of-Staff
      • (2)
        Meet with Dr X about the report, interview the other parties, document your findings, and refer Dr X for counseling, if indicated
      • (3)
        Appoint an investigative committee, which you will chair
      • (4)
        Meet with Dr X. and document your findings carefully
      • (5)
        Make extensive notes and wait to see if it happens again
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Boisaubin E.V.
        • Levine R.E.
        Identifying and assisting the impaired physician.
        Am J Med Sci. 2001; 322: 31-36
        • McCulbough L.B.
        John Gregory's writings on medical ethics and the philosophy of medicine.
        Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands1998
        • Percival
        • Thomas
        Medical ethics, or a code of institutes and precepts, adapted to the professional conduct of physicians and surgeons.
        Johnson and Bickerstaff, London1803
        • Verghese A.
        Physicians and addiction.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1510-1511