Advertisement
Original Communication| Volume 143, ISSUE 4, P476-482, April 2008

Download started.

Ok

Preoperative contralateral portal vein embolization before major hepatic resection is a safe and efficient procedure: A large single institution experience

  • Giorgio Giraudo
    Affiliations
    Centre de Chirurgie Viscérale et de Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université Louis Pasteur Avenue Molière, Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Michel Greget
    Affiliations
    Service de Radiologie I, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université Louis Pasteur Avenue Molière, Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Elie Oussoultzoglou
    Affiliations
    Centre de Chirurgie Viscérale et de Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université Louis Pasteur Avenue Molière, Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Edoardo Rosso
    Affiliations
    Centre de Chirurgie Viscérale et de Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université Louis Pasteur Avenue Molière, Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Philippe Bachellier
    Affiliations
    Centre de Chirurgie Viscérale et de Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université Louis Pasteur Avenue Molière, Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Daniel Jaeck
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: Daniel Jaeck, Centre de Chirurgie Viscérale et de Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université Louis Pasteur, Avenue Molière, Strasbourg, France.
    Affiliations
    Centre de Chirurgie Viscérale et de Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université Louis Pasteur Avenue Molière, Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author

      Background

      The aim of this study was to report the results of preoperative contralateral portal vein embolization (PVE) performed in a single institution.

      Methods

      Between January 1997 and March 2006, 146 patients requiring a right or extended right hepatectomy for primary or secondary liver tumors underwent contralateral PVE when the future remnant liver volume (FRL) was less than 30% of total liver. Liver volumes and hepatic function were evaluated before and after PVE.

      Results

      Contralateral PVE was performed successfully in 145 patients. In one patient, the catheterization of the left portal branch failed. Complications occurred in 14 patients (10%) including a transitory fever (n = 9), a parenchymal hematoma (n = 1), a mild hemoperitoneum (n = 1), a mesenterico-portal venous thrombosis (n = 1), a pulmonary embolism (n = 1) and a systemic sepsis (n = 1). The prothrombine ratio and the platelet count were significantly lower 3 days after PVE. Insufficient hypertrophy of the FRL was observed in 8 patients, malignant disease progression in 15, and both insufficient hypertrophy and disease progression in 4. The hypertrophy rate of the FRL 4 to 8 weeks after PVE was 47.7 ± 31.9%. Pathological type of the liver tumor, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, and chemotherapy did not affect the volume of the left liver hypertrophy. However, the time required to achieve an adequate liver hypertrophy was significantly shorter in patients with normal liver. One-hundred and fourteen patients (78.6%) subsequently underwent hepatic resection.

      Conclusions

      The results suggest that contralateral PVE is a safe and efficient procedure inducing adequate hypertrophy of the FRL before major liver resection.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Jaeck D.
        • Bachellier P.
        • Guiguet M.
        • Boudjema K.
        • Vaillant J.C.
        • Balladur P.
        • et al.
        Long-term survival following resection of colorectal hepatic metastases.
        Br J Surg. 1997; 84: 977-980
        • Nordlinger B.
        • Guiguet M.
        • Vaillant J.C.
        • Balladur P.
        • Boudjema K.
        • Bachellier P.
        • et al.
        Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver: a prognostic scoring system to improve case selection, based on 1568 patients.
        Cancer. 1996; 75: 1254-1262
        • Belghiti J.
        • Hiramatsu K.
        • Benoist S.
        • Massault P.
        • Sauvanet A.
        • Farges O.
        Seven-hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2000; 191: 38-46
        • Jarnagin W.R.
        • Gonen M.
        • Fong Y.
        • DeMatteo R.P.
        • Ben-Porat L.
        • Little S.
        • et al.
        Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade.
        Ann Surg. 2002; 236: 397-407
        • Moertal C.G.
        Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 1136-1139
        • Rougier P.
        • Van Cutsem E.
        • Bajetta E.
        • Niederle N.
        • Possinger K.
        • Labianca R.
        • et al.
        Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
        Lancet. 1998; 352: 1407-1412
        • Melendez J.
        • Ferri E.
        • Zwillman M.
        • Fischer M.
        • DeMatteo R.
        • Leung D.
        • et al.
        Extended hepatic resection: a 6-year retrospective study of risk factors for perioperative mortality.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2001; 192: 47-53
        • Shirabe K.
        • Shimada M.
        • Gion T.
        • Hasegawa H.
        • Takenaka K.
        • Utsunomiya T.
        • et al.
        Postoperative liver failure after major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era with special reference to remnant liver volume.
        J Am Coll Surg. 1999; 188: 304-309
        • Honjo I.
        • Suzuki T.
        • Ozawa K.
        • Takosan M.
        • Kitamura O.
        Ligation of a branch of the portal vein for carcinoma of the liver.
        Am J Surg. 1975; 130: 296-302
        • Makuuchi M.
        • Thai B.L.
        • Takayasu K.
        • Takayama T.
        • Kosuge T.
        • Gunvén P.
        • et al.
        Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report.
        Surgery. 1990; 107: 521-527
        • Nagino H.
        • Nimura Y.
        • Kamiya J.
        • Kondo S.
        • Kanai M.
        Selective percutaneous transhepatic embolization of the portal vein in preparation for extensive liver resection: the ipsilateral approach.
        Radiology. 1996; 200: 559-563
        • Kinoshita H.
        • Sakai K.
        • Hirihashi K.
        • Igawa S.
        • Yamasaki O.
        • Kubo S.
        Preoperative portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.
        World J Surg. 1986; 10: 803-808
        • Hemming A.W.
        • Reed A.I.
        • Howard R.J.
        • Fujita S.
        • Hochwald S.N.
        • Caridi J.G.
        • et al.
        Preoperative portal vein embolization for extended hepatectomy.
        Ann Surg. 2004; 237: 686-693
        • Balzan S.
        • Belghiti J.
        • Farges O.
        • Ogata S.
        • Sauvanet A.
        • Delefosse D.
        • et al.
        The “50-50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 242 (discussion 828-9): 824-828
        • Nagino M.
        • Nimura Y.
        • Kamiya J.
        • Kondo S.
        • Uesaka K.
        • Kin Y.
        • et al.
        Changes in hepatic lobe volume in biliary tract carcinoma patients after right portal vein embolization.
        Hepatology. 1995; 21: 434-439
        • De Baere T.
        • Roche A.
        • Elias D.
        • Lasser P.
        • Lagrange C.
        • Bousson V.
        Preoperative portal vein embolization for extension of hepatectomy indications.
        Hepatology. 1996; 24: 1386-1391
        • Shimamura T.
        • Nakajima Y.
        • Une Y.
        • Namieno T.
        • Ogasawara K.
        • Yamashita K.
        • et al.
        Efficacity and safety of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic portal embolization with absolute ethanol: a clinical study.
        Surgery. 1997; 121: 135-141
        • Wakabayashi H.
        • Okada S.
        • Maeba T.
        • Maeta H.
        Effect of preoperative portal vein embolization on major hepatectomy for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinomas in injuried livers: a preliminary report.
        Surg Today. 1997; 29: 403-410
        • Kianmanesh R.
        • Farges O.
        • Abdalla E.K.
        • Sauvanet A.
        • Ruszniewski P.
        • Belghiti J.
        Right portal vein ligation: a new planned two-step all-surgical approach for complete resection of primary gastrointestinal tumors with multiple bilateral liver metastases.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 197: 164-170
        • Broering D.C.
        • Millert C.
        • Krupski G.
        • Fischer L.
        • Mueller L.
        • Achilles E.G.
        • et al.
        Portal vein embolization vs portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2002; 6: 905-913
        • Jaeck D.
        • Bachellier P.
        • Nakano H.
        • Oussoultzoglou E.
        • Weber J.C.
        • Wolf P.
        • et al.
        One or two-stage hepatectomy combined with portal vein embolization for initially nonresectable colorectal liver metastases.
        Am J Surg. 2003; 185: 221-229
        • Nagino M.
        • Kamiya J.
        • Nishio H.
        • Ebata T.
        • Arai T.
        • Nimura Y.
        Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer.
        Ann Surg. 2006; 243: 364-372
        • Azoulay D.
        • Castaing D.
        • Krissat J.
        • Smail A.
        • Hargreaves G.M.
        • Lemoine A.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous portal vein embolization increases the feasibility and the safety of major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in injured liver.
        Ann Surg. 2000; 232: 665-672
        • Azoulay D.
        • Castaing D.
        • Smail A.
        • Adam R.
        • Cailliez V.
        • Laurent A.
        • et al.
        Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization.
        Ann Surg. 2000; 231: 480-486
        • Jaeck D.
        • Oussoultzoglou E.
        • Rosso E.
        • Greget M.
        • Weber J.C.
        • Bachellier P.
        A two-stage hepatectomy procedure combined with portal vein embolization to achieve curative resection for initially unresecable multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases.
        Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 1037-1051
        • Madoff D.C.
        • Hicks M.E.
        • Abdalla E.K.
        • Morris J.S.
        • Vauthey J.N.
        Portal vein embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles and coils in preparation for major liver resection for hepatobiliary malignancy: safety and effectiveness- Study in 26 patients.
        Radiology. 2003; 227: 251-260
        • Elias D.
        • De Baere T.
        • Roche A.
        • Bonvallot S.
        • Lasser P.
        Preoperative selective portal vein embolizations are an effective means of extending the indications of major hepatectomy in the normal and injured liver.
        Hepatogastroenterology. 1998; 45: 170-177
        • Capussotti L.
        • Muratore A.
        • Ferrero A.
        • Anselmetti G.C.
        • Corgnier A.
        • Regge D.
        Extension of right portal vein embolization to segment IV portal branches.
        Arch Surg. 2005; 140: 1100-1103
        • Vajrabukka T.
        • Bloom A.L.
        • Sussmann M.
        • Wood C.B.
        • Blumgart L.H.
        Postoperative problems and management after hepatic resection for blunt injury to the liver.
        Br J Surg. 1975; 62: 189-200
        • Malhotra A.K.
        • Fabian T.C.
        • Croce M.A.
        • Gavin T.J.
        • Kudsk K.A.
        • Minard G.
        • et al.
        Blunt hepatic injury: a paradigm shift from operative to nonoperative management in the 1990s.
        Ann Surg. 2000; 231: 804-813
        • Abdalla E.K.
        • Hicks M.E.
        • Vauthey J.N.
        Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique and future prospects.
        Br J Surg. 2001; 88: 165-175
        • Lee K.C.
        • Kinoshita H.
        • Hirohashi K.
        • Kubo S.
        • Iwasa R.
        Extension of surgical indications for hepatocellular carcinoma by portal vein embolization.
        World J Surg. 1993; 17: 109-115
        • Yamanaka N.
        • Okamoto E.
        • Kawamura E.
        • Kato T.
        • Oriyama T.
        • Fujimoto J.
        • et al.
        Dynamics of normal and injured human liver regeneration after hepatectomy as assessed on the basis of computed tomography and liver function.
        Hepatology. 1993; 18: 79-85
        • Oussoultzoglou E.
        • Bachellier P.
        • Rosso E.
        • Scurtu R.
        • Lucescu I.
        • Greget M.
        • et al.
        Right portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy for unilobar colorectal liver metastases reduces the intrahepatic recurrence rate.
        Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 71-79