Original Communication| Volume 147, ISSUE 4, P575-580, April 2010

Download started.


A novel treatment for bile duct injury with a tissue-engineered bioabsorbable polymer patch

Published:December 11, 2009DOI:


      With the recent widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and living-donor liver transplantation, complications involving the biliary system, and stenosis in particular, are encountered frequently. Although various invasive and noninvasive techniques are now available for the treatment of biliary stenosis, recurrence and other problems limit their value and utility. Our group sought to investigate whether a bioabsorbable polymer (BAP) patch could serve as a novel treatment for biliary stenosis.


      In anesthetized hybrid pigs (n = 12), a spindle-shaped portion of the lower common bile duct wall was excised, and a BAP patch was implanted at the excision site. The animals underwent repeat laparotomy at 5 weeks (n = 6) and at 4 months (n = 6) after implantation to recover the graft sites for gross and histologic studies. Blood chemistry was analyzed from samples taken during the patch implantation and recovery.


      All of the recipient pigs survived until killing. All gained weight and showed no evidence of jaundice. The BAP-patched duct remained patent without obstruction at 5 weeks postimplantation. Blood chemistry did not reveal any increases in hepatobiliary enzyme activities. Histology showed accessory glandular structures in the neo-bile duct. At 4 months, the graft site was indistinguishable from the native duct. Intra-operative cholangiography revealed dilation of the patched site, but no dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts. Blood chemistry values were within normal ranges. Histology at the site of the patch confirmed the growth of a cuboidal columnar epithelium similar to that of the native duct.


      The bile duct was dilated only focally at the site of implantation. This newly designed substitute has potential for application as a novel treatment for biliary injury and stenosis.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Lillemoe K.D.
        • Melton G.B.
        • Cameron J.L.
        • Pitt H.A.
        • Campbell K.A.
        • Talamini M.A.
        • et al.
        Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s.
        Ann Surg. 2000; 232: 430-441
        • Shah S.A.
        • Grant D.R.
        • McGilvray I.D.
        • Greig P.D.
        • Selzner M.
        • Lilly L.B.
        • et al.
        Biliary strictures in 130 consecutive right lobe living donor liver transplant recipients: results of a Western center.
        Am J Transplant. 2007; 7: 161-167
        • Feller R.B.
        • Waugh R.C.
        • Selby W.S.
        • Dolan P.M.
        • Sheil A.G.
        • McCaughan G.W.
        Biliary strictures after liver transplantation: clinical picture, correlates and outcomes.
        J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996; 11: 21-25
        • Judah J.R.
        • Draganov P.V.
        Endoscopic therapy of benign biliary strictures.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13: 3531-3539
        • Lillemoe K.D.
        • Pitt H.A.
        • Cameron J.L.
        Current management of benign bile duct strictures.
        Adv Surg. 1992; 25: 119-174
        • Lopez Jr., R.R.
        • Cosenza C.A.
        • Lois J.
        • Hoffman A.L.
        • Sher L.S.
        • Noguchi H.
        • et al.
        Long-term results of metallic stents for benign biliary strictures.
        Arch Surg. 2001; 136: 664-669
        • Hakamada K.
        • Sasaki M.
        • Endoh M.
        • Itoh T.
        • Morita T.
        • Konn M.
        Late development of bile duct cancer after sphincteroplasty: a ten- to twenty-two-year follow-up study.
        Surgery. 1997; 121: 488-492
        • Maghsoudi H.
        • Garadaghi A.
        • Jafary G.A.
        Biliary peritonitis requiring reoperation after removal of T-tubes from the common bile duct.
        Am J Surg. 2005; 190: 430-433
        • Tang C.N.
        • Tai C.K.
        • Ha J.P.
        • Tsui K.K.
        • Wong D.C.
        • Li M.K.
        Antegrade biliary stenting versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy—a comparative cohort study.
        Hepatogastroenterology. 2006; 53: 330-334
        • Gharaibeh K.I.
        • Heiss H.A.
        Biliary leakage following T-tube removal.
        Int Surg. 2000; 85: 57-63
        • Maeda A.
        • Yokoi S.
        • Kunou T.
        • Saeki S.
        • Murata T.
        • Niinomi N.
        • et al.
        Bile duct cancer developing 21 years after choledochoduodenostomy.
        Dig Surg. 2003; 20: 331-334
        • Herba M.J.
        • Casola G.
        • Bret P.M.
        • Lough J.
        • Hampson L.G.
        Cholangiocarcinoma as a late complication of choledochoenteric anastomoses.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986; 147: 513-515
        • Bettschart V.
        • Clayton R.A.
        • Parks R.W.
        • Garden O.J.
        • Bellamy C.O.
        Cholangiocarcinoma arising after biliary-enteric drainage procedures for benign disease.
        Gut. 2002; 51: 128-129
        • Tocchi A.
        • Mazzoni G.
        • Liotta G.
        • Lepre L.
        • Cassini D.
        • Miccini M.
        Late development of bile duct cancer in patients who had biliary-enteric drainage for benign disease: a follow-up study of more than 1,000 patients.
        Ann Surg. 2001; 234: 210-214
        • Kurumado K.
        • Nagai T.
        • Kondo Y.
        • Abe H.
        Long-term observations on morphological changes of choledochal epithelium after choledochoenterostomy in rats.
        Dig Dis Sci. 1994; 39: 809-820
        • Miyazawa M.
        • Torii T.
        • Toshimitsu Y.
        • Koyama I.
        • Ikada Y.
        A tissue-engineered artificial bile duct grown to resemble the native bile duct.
        Am J Transplant. 2005; 5: 1541-1547
        • Bandura W.P.
        • Arbulu A.
        Experimental replacement of the common bile duct with Teflon graft.
        Am Surg. 1961; 27: 518-524
        • Gomez N.A.
        • Alvarez L.R.
        • Mite A.
        • Andrade J.P.
        • Alvarez J.R.
        • Vargas P.E.
        • et al.
        Repair of bile duct injuries with Gore-Tex vascular grafts: experimental study in dogs.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2002; 6: 116-120
        • Christensen M.
        • Laursen H.B.
        • Rokkjaer M.
        • Jensen P.F.
        • Yasuda Y.
        • Mortensen F.V.
        Reconstruction of the common bile duct by a vascular prosthetic graft: an experimental study in pigs.
        J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005; 12: 231-234
        • Mendelowitz D.S.
        • Beal J.M.
        Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in reconstruction of the canine biliary system.
        Am J Surg. 1982; 143: 221-224
        • Bottger T.
        • Mann B.
        • Pickel B.
        • Weber W.
        • Sorger K.
        • Junginger T.
        Animal experiment studies of pedicled small intestine transplantation as partial extrahepatic bile duct replacement.
        Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991; 376: 77-84
        • Belzer F.O.
        • Watts J.M.
        • Ross H.B.
        • Dunphy J.E.
        Auto-reconstruction of the common bile duct after venous patch graft.
        Ann Surg. 1965; 162: 346-355
        • Aydin M.
        • Bakir B.
        • Kosem M.
        • Kisli E.
        • Genccelep M.
        Biliary tract reconstruction with autologous rectus sheath graft–an experimental study.
        Hepatogastroenterology. 2005; 52: 1019-1022
        • Sedgwick C.E.
        Reconstruction of the common bile duct with a free ureteral graft; an experimental study.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1951; 92: 571-573
        • Rosen M.
        • Ponsky J.
        • Petras R.
        Small intestinal submucosa as a bioscaffold for biliary tract regeneration.
        Surgery. 2002; 132: 480-486
        • Gomez N.A.
        • Zapatier J.A.
        • Vargas P.E.
        Re: “Small intestinal submucosa as a bioscaffold for biliary tract regeneration”.
        Surgery. 2004; 135: 460
        • El-Assmy A.
        • Hafez A.T.
        • El-Sherbiny M.T.
        • El-Hamid M.A.
        • Mohsen T.
        • Nour E.M.
        • et al.
        Use of single layer small intestinal submucosa for long segment ureteral replacement: a pilot study.
        J Urol. 2004; 171: 1939-1942