Original Communication| Volume 149, ISSUE 3, P404-410, March 2011

Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Published:September 20, 2010DOI:


      Esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer is the standard surgical treatment as a curative measure or for palliation. Esophagogastric anastomotic leakage and stricture are common life-threatening postoperative complications (more so if the leakage occurs in the chest), and the success of the anastomosis created in the reconstruction of the resected esophagus can highly influence morbidity and mortality.


      A prospective, randomized study was undertaken on 291 patients treated for carcinoma of the esophagus between January 2004 and December 2008. The study excluded 36 patients (12%) who were inoperable. Patients were assigned to 2 treatment groups that consisted of 128 patients in group A and 127 patients in group B according to a restricted, permuted block randomization plan. Patients in group A underwent an esophagogastrectomy with wrapping of the pedicle omental flap around the esophagogastric anastomosis. Group B patients underwent an esophagogastrectomy with only a stapled technique.


      Of all 255 patients who received an esophagogastric anastomosis, 226 (89%) were discharged from the hospital within 15 days of operation. There was no significant difference between these 2 groups in regard to the incidence of pulmonary complications, abdominal or thoracic infections, and days of hospital stay. Anastomotic leaks occurred in a single patient from group A (1%) and in 7 patients from group B (6%). In group A, 33 patients underwent transhiatal esophagogastrectomy and 95 had thoracic esophagogastrectomy, which resulted in an anastomotic leakage in 1 (3%) and 0 (0%) patients, respectively. In group B, 42 patients had transhiatal esophagogastrectomy and 85 had thoracic esophagogastrectomy, which resulted in anastomotic leakage in 5 (12%) and 2 (2%) patients, respectively. The leakage ratio of group B was significant greater than that of group A (P < .05). Two patients were excluded during the evaluation of the benign stricture due to hospital mortality. Anastomotic strictures were noted in 8 patients from group A (6%) and 20 patients from group B (16%), and the difference in the incidence of anastomotic strictures between these 2 groups was statistically significant (P < .05).


      Wrapping of the pedicle omental flap around the esophagogastric stapled anastomosis site decreases the incidence of anastomotic leakage and stricture rate after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, thereby decreasing the morbidity and mortality of the procedure.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Scripcariu V.
        • Diaconu C.
        • Stoian M.
        • Dragomir C.
        [Transhiatal esophagectomy for treatment of benign and malignant esophageal diseases].
        Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2004; 108: 390-396
        • Lorentz T.
        • Fok M.
        • Wong J.
        Anastomotic leakage after resection and bypass for esophageal cancer: lessons learned from the past.
        World J Surg. 1989; 13: 472-477
        • Hulscher J.B.
        • Tijssen J.G.
        • Obertop H.
        • van Lanschot J.J.
        Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72: 306-313
        • Ancona E.
        • Cagol M.
        • Epifani M.
        • Cavallin F.
        • Zaninotto G.
        • Castoro C.
        • et al.
        Surgical complications do not affect longterm survival after esophagectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus and cardia.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 661-669
        • Crestanello J.A.
        • Deschamps C.
        • Cassivi S.D.
        • Nichols F.C.
        • Allen M.S.
        • Schleck C.
        • et al.
        Selective management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 129: 254-260
        • Griffin S.M.
        • Lamb P.J.
        • Dresner S.M.
        • Richardson D.L.
        • Hayes N.
        Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2001; 88: 1346-1351
        • Orringer M.B.
        • Marshall B.
        • Iannettoni M.D.
        Transhiatalesophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements.
        Ann Surg. 1999; 230: 392-400
        • Portale G.
        • Hagen J.A.
        • Peters J.H.
        • Chan L.S.
        • DeMeester S.R.
        • Gandamihardja T.A.
        • et al.
        Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 202: 588-598
        • Rizk N.P.
        • Bach P.B.
        • Schrag D.
        • Bains M.S.
        • Turnbull A.D.
        • Karpeh M.
        • et al.
        The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 198: 42-50
        • Sauvanet A.
        • Baltar J.
        • Le Mee J.
        • Belghiti J.
        Diagnosis and conservative management of intrathoracic leakage after esophagectomy.
        Br J Surg. 1998; 85: 1446-1449
        • Whooley B.P.
        • Law S.
        • Alexandrou A.
        • Murthy S.C.
        • Wong J.
        Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer.
        Am J Surg. 2001; 181: 198-203
        • Hsu H.H.
        • Chen J.S.
        • Huang P.M.
        • Lee J.M.
        • Lee Y.C.
        Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004; 25: 1097-1101
        • Fok M.
        • Ah-Chong A.K.
        • Cheng S.W.K.
        • Wong J.
        Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses.
        Br J Surg. 1991; 78: 342-345
        • Lee Y.
        • Fujita H.
        • Yamana H.
        • Kakegawa T.
        Factors affecting leakage following esophageal anastomosis.
        Surg Today. 1994; 24: 24-29
        • Urschel J.D.
        Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review.
        Am J Surg. 1995; 169: 634-640
        • Begg C.
        • Cho M.
        • Eastwood S.
        • Horton R.
        • Moher D.
        • Olkin I.
        • et al.
        Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
        JAMA. 1996; 276: 637-639
        • Rice T.W.
        • Blackstone E.H.
        • Rusch V.W.
        7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: esophagus and esophagogastric junction.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 1721-1724
        • Swanson S.J.
        • Batirel H.F.
        • Bueno R.
        • Jaklitsch M.T.
        • Lukanich J.M.
        • Allred E.
        • et al.
        Transthoracic esophagectomy with radical mediastinal and abdominal lymph node dissection and cervical esophagogastrostomy for esophageal carcinoma.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72: 1918-1925
        • Tabira Y.
        • Yasunaga M.
        • Sakaguchi T.
        • Yamaguchi Y.
        • Okuma T.
        • Kawasuji M.
        Outcome of histologically node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
        World J Surg. 2002; 26: 1446-1451
        • Tachibana M.
        • Kinugasa S.
        • Yoshimura H.
        • Shibakita M.
        • Tonomoto Y.
        • Dhar D.K.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
        Am J Surg. 2005; 189: 98-109
        • Tilanus H.W.
        • Hop W.C.
        • Langenhorst B.L.
        • van Lanschot J.J.
        Esophagectomy with or without thoracotomy. Is there any difference?.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993; 105: 898-903
        • Fok M.
        • Law S.
        • Stipa F.
        • Cheng S.
        • Wong J.
        A comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for oesophageal carcinoma.
        Endoscopy. 1993; 25: 660-663
        • Lerut T.
        • De Leyn P.
        • Coosemans W.
        • Van Raemdonck D.
        • Scheys I.
        • LeSaffre E.
        Surgical strategies in esophageal carcinoma with emphasis on radical lymphadenectomy.
        Ann Surg. 1992; 216: 583-590
        • Levashev Y.N.
        • Akopov A.L.
        • Mosin I.V.
        The possibilities of greater omentum usage in thoracic surgery.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999; 15: 465-468
        • Liu K.
        • Zhang G.C.
        • Cai Z.J.
        Avoiding anastomotic leakage following esophagogastrectomy.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983; 86: 142-145
        • Goldsmith H.S.
        • Kiely A.A.
        • Randall H.T.
        Protection of intrathoracic esophageal anastomoses by omentum.
        Surgery. 1968; 63: 464-466
        • Zhang K.
        • Yang Y.H.
        Use of pedicled omentum in oesophagogastric anastomosis: analysis of 100 cases.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987; 69: 209-211
        • Bhat M.A.
        • Dar M.A.
        • Lone G.N.
        • Dar A.M.
        Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 82: 1857-1862
        • Hayari L.
        • Hershko D.D.
        • Shoshani H.
        • Maor R.
        • Mordecovich D.
        • Shoshani G.
        Omentopexy improves vascularization and decreases stricture formation of esophageal anastomoses in a dog model.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2004; 39: 540-544
        • Zhang Q.X.
        • Magovern C.J.
        • Mack C.A.
        • Budenbender K.T.
        • Ko W.
        • Rosengart T.K.
        Vascular endothelial growth factor is the major angiogenic factor in omentum: mechanism of the omentum-mediated angiogenesis.
        J Surg Res. 1997; 67: 147-154
        • Goldsmith H.S.
        The evolution of omentum transposition: from lymphedema to spinal cord, stroke and Alzheimer’s disease.
        Neurol Res. 2004; 26: 586-593