Advertisement
Clinical Review| Volume 149, ISSUE 6, P830-840, June 2011

Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery

Published:January 18, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003

      Background

      Health care systems provide care to increasingly complex and elderly patients. Colorectal surgery is a prime example, with high volumes of major procedures, significant morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and unplanned readmissions. This situation is exacerbated by an exponential rise in costs that threatens the stability of health care systems. Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) have been proposed as a means to reduce morbidity and improve effectiveness of care. We have reviewed the evidence supporting the implementation of ERP in clinical practice.

      Methods

      Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for randomized, controlled trials comparing ERP with traditional care in colorectal surgery. Systematic reviews and papers on ERP based on data published in major surgical and anesthesiology journals were critically reviewed by international contributors, experienced in the development and implementation of ERP.

      Results

      A random-effect Bayesian meta-analysis was performed, including 6 randomized, controlled trials totalizing 452 patients. For patients adhering to ERP, length of stay decreased by 2.5 days (95% credible interval [CrI] −3.92 to −1.11), whereas 30-day morbidity was halved (relative risk, 0.52; 95% CrI, 0.36–0.73) and readmission was not increased (relative risk, 0.59; 95% CrI, 0.14–1.43) when compared with patients undergoing traditional care.

      Conclusion

      Adherence to ERP achieves a reproducible improvement in the quality of care by enabling standardization of health care processes. Thus, while accelerating recovery and safely reducing hospital stay, ERPs optimize utilization of health care resources. ERPs can and should be routinely used in care after colorectal and other major gastrointestinal procedures.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. The Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System. The path to a high performance health system: a 2020 vision and the policies to pave the way [updated 2009 Feb; accessed 2009 May 20]. Available from: http://www.commonwealthfund.org.

        • Schilling P.L.
        • Dimick J.B.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 698-704
        • Longo W.E.
        • Virgo K.S.
        • Johnson F.E.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 83-91
        • White P.F.
        • Kehlet H.
        • Neal J.M.
        • Schricker T.
        • Carr D.B.
        • Carli F.
        The role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery: from multimodal analgesia to perioperative medical care.
        Anesth Analg. 2007; 104: 1380-1396
        • Khoo C.K.
        • Vickery C.J.
        • Forsyth N.
        • Vinall N.S.
        • Eyre-Brook I.A.
        A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 867-872
        • Kehlet H.
        • Dahl J.B.
        Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery.
        Lancet. 2003; 362: 1921-1928
        • Wind J.
        • Polle S.W.
        • Fung Kon Jin P.H.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 800-809
        • Gouvas N.
        • Tan E.
        • Windsor A.
        • Xynos E.
        • Tekkis P.P.
        Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009; 24: 1119-1131
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Gerkin T.M.
        • et al.
        Association of surgical care practices with length of stay and use of clinical protocols after elective bowel resection: results of a national survey.
        Am J Surg. 2010; 199: 299-304
        • Walter C.J.
        • Smith A.
        • Guillou P.
        Perceptions of the application of fast-track surgical principles by general surgeons.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006; 88: 191-195
        • Basse L.
        • Hjort J.D.
        • Billesbolle P.
        • Werner M.
        • Kehlet H.
        A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection.
        Ann Surg. 2000; 232: 51-57
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Fazio V.W.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Robinson B.
        • Halverson A.L.
        • Remzi F.H.
        ‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2001; 88: 1533-1538
        • Fearon K.C.
        • Ljungqvist O.
        • von M.M.
        • et al.
        Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection.
        Clin Nutr. 2005; 24: 466-477
        • Kehlet H.
        • Wilmore D.W.
        Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery.
        Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 189-198
        • Noblett S.E.
        • Watson D.S.
        • Huong H.
        • Davison B.
        • Hainsworth P.J.
        • Horgan A.F.
        Pre-operative oral carbohydrate loading in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
        Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8: 563-569
        • Soop M.
        • Nygren J.
        • Myrenfors P.
        • Thorell A.
        • Ljungqvist O.
        Preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment attenuates immediate postoperative insulin resistance.
        Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 280: E576-E583
        • Nygren J.
        • Soop M.
        • Thorell A.
        • Efendic S.
        • Nair K.S.
        • Ljungqvist O.
        Preoperative oral carbohydrate administration reduces postoperative insulin resistance.
        Clin Nutr. 1998; 17: 65-71
      2. PROSPECT. Procedure specific postoperative pain management—colonic resection [updated 2005 Dec; accessed 2009 Aug 24]. Available from: http://www.postoppain.org/image.aspx?imgid=140.

        • Tiippana E.M.
        • Hamunen K.
        • Kontinen V.K.
        • Kalso E.
        Do surgical patients benefit from perioperative gabapentin/pregabalin? A systematic review of efficacy and safety.
        Anesth Analg. 2007; 104: 1545-1556
        • Guenaga K.K.
        • Matos D.
        • Wille-Jorgensen P.
        Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 1 (CD001544)
        • Chappell D.
        • Jacob M.
        • Hofmann-Kiefer K.
        • Conzen P.
        • Rehm M.
        A rational approach to perioperative fluid management.
        Anesthesiology. 2008; 109: 723-740
        • Rahbari N.N.
        • Zimmermann J.B.
        • Schmidt T.
        • Koch M.
        • Weigand M.A.
        • Weitz J.
        Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2009; 96: 331-341
      3. The Intensive Care Society. British Consensus Guidelines on Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Adult Surgical Patients (GIFTASUP) [Updated 2009 Jan 5; Accessed 2009 Aug 24]. Available from: http://www.ics.ac.uk/downloads/2009012406_GIFTASUP%20FINAL_05_01_09.pdf.

        • Phan T.D.
        • Ismail H.
        • Heriot A.G.
        • Ho K.M.
        Improving perioperative outcomes: fluid optimization with the esophageal Doppler monitor, a metaanalysis and review.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 935-941
        • Kehlet H.
        • Bundgaard-Nielsen M.
        Goal-directed perioperative fluid management: why, when, and how?.
        Anesthesiology. 2009; 110: 453-455
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Emery T.
        • Luchtefeld M.A.
        • Kim D.
        • Dujovny N.
        • Hoedema R.
        Fluid management for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized assessment of goal directed administration of balanced salt solution or hetastarch coupled with an enhanced recovery program.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52: 1935-1940
        • Muller S.
        • Zalunardo M.P.
        • Hubner M.
        • Clavien P.A.
        • Demartines N.
        A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery.
        Gastroenterology. 2009; 136: 842-847
        • Bundgaard-Nielsen M.
        • Secher N.H.
        • Kehlet H.
        ‘Liberal’ vs. ‘restrictive’ perioperative fluid therapy—a critical assessment of the evidence.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009; 53: 843-851
        • Petrowsky H.
        • Demartines N.
        • Rousson V.
        • Clavien P.A.
        Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
        Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 1074-1084
        • Nelson R.
        • Edwards S.
        • Tse B.
        Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 3 (CD004929)
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Mekhail N.
        • Dugan A.
        • Fazio V.W.
        Randomized clinical trial comparing epidural anaesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic segmental colectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2003; 90: 1195-1199
        • Neudecker J.
        • Schwenk W.
        • Junghans T.
        • Pietsch S.
        • Bohm B.
        • Muller J.M.
        Randomized controlled trial to examine the influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic sigmoid resection.
        Br J Surg. 1999; 86: 1292-1295
        • Turunen P.
        • Carpelan-Holmstrom M.
        • Kairaluoma P.
        • et al.
        Epidural analgesia diminished pain but did not otherwise improve enhanced recovery after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a prospective randomized study.
        Surg Endosc. 2009; 23: 31-37
        • Marret E.
        • Remy C.
        • Bonnet F.
        Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2007; 94: 665-673
        • Kehlet H.
        Postoperative ileus—an update on preventive techniques.
        Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 5: 552-558
        • Soop M.
        • Carlson G.L.
        • Hopkinson J.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial of the effects of immediate enteral nutrition on metabolic responses to major colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery protocol.
        Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 1138-1145
        • Lewis S.J.
        • Andersen H.K.
        • Thomas S.
        Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13: 569-575
        • Goodney P.P.
        • Stukel T.A.
        • Lucas F.L.
        • Finlayson E.V.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery.
        Ann Surg. 2003; 238: 161-167
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Chang E.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Broder M.
        Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.
        Ann Surg. 2008; 247: 819-824
      4. Northgate Information Solutions on behalf of The NHS Information Centre for health and social care. Hospital Episode Statistics in NHS hospitals in England [updated 2007 Mar; accessed 2009 May].

        • Raue W.
        • Haase O.
        • Junghans T.
        • Scharfenberg M.
        • Muller J.M.
        • Schwenk W.
        ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation.
        Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 1463-1468
        • Braumann C.
        • Guenther N.
        • Wendling P.
        • et al.
        Multimodal perioperative rehabilitation in elective conventional resection of colonic cancer: results from the German Multicenter Quality Assurance Program ‘Fast-Track Colon II’.
        Dig Surg. 2009; 26: 123-129
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Zutshi M.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Remzi F.H.
        • Hammel J.
        • Fazio V.W.
        Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 851-859
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Delaney C.P.
        A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1000 cases.
        Am J Surg. 2006; 191: 377-380
        • Basse L.
        • Jakobsen D.H.
        • Bardram L.
        • et al.
        Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 241: 416-423
        • King P.M.
        • Blazeby J.M.
        • Ewings P.
        • et al.
        The influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes, costs and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer.
        Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8: 506-513
        • Basse L.
        • Thorbol J.E.
        • Lossl K.
        • Kehlet H.
        Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47: 271-277
        • Anderson A.D.
        • McNaught C.E.
        • MacFie J.
        • Tring I.
        • Barker P.
        • Mitchell C.J.
        Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care.
        Br J Surg. 2003; 90: 1497-1504
        • Gatt M.
        • Anderson A.D.
        • Reddy B.S.
        • Hayward-Sampson P.
        • Tring I.C.
        • MacFie J.
        Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection.
        Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 1354-1362
        • Zargar-Shoshtari K.
        • Connolly A.B.
        • Israel L.H.
        • Hill A.G.
        Fast-track surgery may reduce complications following major colonic surgery.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51: 1633-1640
        • Serclova Z.
        • Dytrych P.
        • Marvan J.
        • et al.
        Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456).
        Clin Nutr. 2009; 28: 618-624
        • DiFronzo L.A.
        • Yamin N.
        • Patel K.
        • O’Connell T.X.
        Benefits of early feeding and early hospital discharge in elderly patients undergoing open colon resection.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 197: 747-752
        • Scharfenberg M.
        • Raue W.
        • Junghans T.
        • Schwenk W.
        “Fast-track” rehabilitation after colonic surgery in elderly patients—is it feasible?.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007; 22: 1469-1474
        • Joh Y.G.
        • Lindsetmo R.O.
        • Stulberg J.
        • Obias V.
        • Champagne B.
        • Delaney C.P.
        Standardized postoperative pathway: accelerating recovery after ileostomy closure.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51: 1786-1789
        • Lindsetmo R.O.
        • Champagne B.
        • Delaney C.P.
        Laparoscopic rectal resections and fast-track surgery: what can be expected?.
        Am J Surg. 2009; 197: 408-412
        • Kariv Y.
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a “fast track” postoperative care pathway for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a case control study.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50: 137-146
        • Kariv Y.
        • Wang W.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Hammel J.P.
        • Fazio V.W.
        • Delaney C.P.
        Multivariable analysis of factors associated with hospital readmission after intestinal surgery.
        Am J Surg. 2006; 191: 364-371
        • Azimuddin K.
        • Rosen L.
        • Reed III, J.F.
        • Stasik J.J.
        • Riether R.D.
        • Khubchandani I.T.
        Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44: 942-946
        • Andersen J.
        • Hjort-Jakobsen D.
        • Christiansen P.S.
        • Kehlet H.
        Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2007; 94: 890-893
        • Kiran R.P.
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Steel M.
        • Garafalo T.
        • Fazio V.W.
        Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 198: 877-883
        • Delaney C.P.
        Outcome of discharge within 24 to 72 hours after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51: 181-185
        • Jakobsen D.H.
        • Sonne E.
        • Kehlet H.
        Nursing workload and fast-track colonic surgery.
        J Adv Periop Care. 2006; 2: 177-181
        • Jakobsen D.H.
        • Sonne E.
        • Andreasen J.
        • Kehlet H.
        Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast-track vs conventional care.
        Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8: 683-687
        • Jadad A.R.
        • Moore R.A.
        • Carroll D.
        • et al.
        Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?.
        Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17: 1-12
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Moher D.
        CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.
        Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152: 726-732
        • Adamina M.
        • Tomlinson G.
        • Guller U.
        Bayesian statistics in oncology: a guide for the clinical investigator.
        Cancer. 2009; 115: 5371-5381
        • Sutton A.J.
        • Higgins J.P.
        Recent developments in meta-analysis.
        Stat Med. 2008; 27: 625-650
        • Bradshaw B.G.
        • Liu S.S.
        • Thirlby R.C.
        Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery.
        J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 186: 501-506
        • Junghans T.
        • Raue W.
        • Haase O.
        • Neudecker J.
        • Schwenk W.
        Value of laparoscopic surgery in elective colorectal surgery with “fast-track”-rehabilitation.
        Zentralbl Chir. 2006; 131: 298-303
        • MacKay G.
        • Ihedioha U.
        • McConnachie A.
        • Serpell M.
        • Molloy R.G.
        • O’Dwyer P.J.
        Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery.
        Colorectal Dis. 2007; 9: 368-372
        • Polle S.W.
        • Wind J.
        • Fuhring J.W.
        • Hofland J.
        • Gouma D.J.
        • Bemelman W.A.
        Implementation of a fast-track perioperative care program: what are the difficulties?.
        Dig Surg. 2007; 24: 441-449
        • King P.M.
        • Blazeby J.M.
        • Ewings P.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.
        Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 300-308
        • Ahmed A.U.
        • Keus F.
        • Heikens J.T.
        • et al.
        Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 1 (CD006267)
        • Tou S.
        • Brown S.R.
        • Malik A.I.
        • Nelson R.L.
        Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 4 (CD001758)
        • Kuhry E.
        • Schwenk W.F.
        • Gaupset R.
        • Romild U.
        • Bonjer H.J.
        Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 2 (CD003432)
        • Tjandra J.J.
        • Chan M.K.
        Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer.
        Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8: 375-388
        • Klarenbeek B.R.
        • Veenhof A.A.
        • Bergamaschi R.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: a randomized control trial: short-term results of the Sigma Trial.
        Ann Surg. 2009; 249: 39-44
        • Kiran R.P.
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Millward B.L.
        • Fazio V.W.
        Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations.
        Arch Surg. 2004; 139: 39-42
        • Braga M.
        • Vignali A.
        • Zuliani W.
        • Frasson M.
        • Di S.C.
        • Di C.V.
        Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 890-895
        • King P.M.
        • Blazeby J.M.
        • Ewings P.
        • Kennedy R.H.
        Detailed evaluation of functional recovery following laparoscopic or open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008; 23: 795-800
        • Schwenk W.
        • Bohm B.
        • Muller J.M.
        Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections. A prospective randomized trial.
        Surg Endosc. 1998; 12: 1131-1136
        • Madbouly K.M.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Delaney C.P.
        Endogenous morphine levels after laparoscopic versus open colectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 759-764
        • Frasson M.
        • Braga M.
        • Vignali A.
        • Zuliani W.
        • Di C.V.
        Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51: 296-300
        • Laurent C.
        • Leblanc F.
        • Bretagnol F.
        • Capdepont M.
        • Rullier E.
        Long-term wound advantages of the laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer.
        Br J Surg. 2008; 95: 903-908
        • Duepree H.J.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Fazio V.W.
        Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 197: 177-181
        • Gutt C.N.
        • Oniu T.
        • Schemmer P.
        • Mehrabi A.
        • Buchler M.W.
        Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?.
        Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 898-906
        • Kehlet H.
        • Kennedy R.H.
        Laparoscopic colonic surgery—mission accomplished or work in progress?.
        Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8: 514-517
        • Dimick J.B.
        • Chen S.L.
        • Taheri P.A.
        • Henderson W.G.
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Campbell Jr., D.A.
        Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 199: 531-537
        • Stephen A.E.
        • Berger D.L.
        Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection.
        Surgery. 2003; 133: 277-282
        • Braga M.
        • Frasson M.
        • Vignali A.
        • Zuliani W.
        • Di C.V.
        Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 246: 1010-1014
        • Braga M.
        • Frasson M.
        • Vignali A.
        • Zuliani W.
        • Capretti G.
        • Di C.V.
        Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50: 464-471
        • Duepree H.J.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Brady K.M.
        • Fazio V.W.
        Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn’s disease.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45: 605-610
        • Philipson B.M.
        • Bokey E.L.
        • Moore J.W.
        • Chapuis P.H.
        • Bagge E.
        Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer.
        World J Surg. 1997; 21: 214-217
        • Pfeifer J.
        • Wexner S.D.
        • Reissman P.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic vs open colon surgery. Costs and outcome.
        Surg Endosc. 1995; 9: 1322-1326
        • Young-Fadok T.M.
        • HallLong K.
        • McConnell E.J.
        • Gomez R.G.
        • Cabanela R.L.
        Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs.
        Surg Endosc. 2001; 15: 450-454
        • Liberman M.A.
        • Phillips E.H.
        • Carroll B.J.
        • Fallas M.
        • Rosenthal R.
        Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs.
        Surg Endosc. 1996; 10: 15-18
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Duepree H.J.
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Dissanaike S.
        • Brady K.M.
        • Fazio V.W.
        Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45: 485-490
        • Janson M.
        • Bjorholt I.
        • Carlsson P.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer.
        Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 409-417
        • Franks P.J.
        • Bosanquet N.
        • Thorpe H.
        • et al.
        Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial).
        Br J Cancer. 2006; 95: 6-12
        • Maartense S.
        • Dunker M.S.
        • Slors J.F.
        • et al.
        Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial.
        Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 984-991
        • Maartense S.
        • Dunker M.S.
        • Slors J.F.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a randomized trial.
        Ann Surg. 2006; 243: 143-149
        • Delaney C.P.
        • Kiran R.P.
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Brady K.
        • Fazio V.W.
        Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.
        Ann Surg. 2003; 238: 67-72
        • Senagore A.J.
        • Brannigan A.
        • Kiran R.P.
        • Brady K.
        • Delaney C.P.
        Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48: 1016-1020
        • Rosenthal M.B.
        • Dudley R.A.
        Pay-for-performance: will the latest payment trend improve care?.
        JAMA. 2007; 297: 740-744
        • Birkmeyer N.J.
        • Share D.
        • Campbell Jr., D.A.
        • Prager R.L.
        • Moscucci M.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        Partnering with payers to improve surgical quality: the Michigan plan.
        Surgery. 2005; 138: 815-820
        • Levy B.F.
        • Scott M.J.
        • Fawcett W.J.
        • Rockall T.A.
        23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52: 1239-1243
        • Faiz O.
        • Brown T.
        • Colucci G.
        • Kennedy R.
        A Cohort Study of Results Following Elective Colonic and Rectal Resection within an Enhanced Recovery Programme (ERP).
        Colorectal Dis. 2008; 11: 366-372
        • Vlug M.S.
        • Wind J.
        • van der Z.E.
        • Ubbink D.T.
        • Cense H.A.
        • Bemelman W.A.
        Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme.
        Colorectal Dis. 2009; 11: 335-343
        • Wind J.
        • Hofland J.
        • Preckel B.
        • et al.
        Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial).
        BMC Surg. 2006; : 616
        • Slim K.
        • Panis Y.
        • Chipponi J.
        Half of the current practice of gastrointestinal surgery is against the evidence: a survey of the French Society of Digestive Surgery.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2004; 8: 1079-1082
        • Hannemann P.
        • Lassen K.
        • Hausel J.
        • et al.
        Patterns in current anaesthesiological peri-operative practice for colonic resections: a survey in five northern-European countries.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006; 50: 1152-1160
        • Hasenberg T.
        • Keese M.
        • Langle F.
        • et al.
        ‘Fast-track’ colonic surgery in Austria and Germany—results from the survey on patterns in current perioperative practice.
        Colorectal Dis. 2009; 11: 162-167
        • Kehlet H.
        • Buchler M.W.
        • Beart Jr., R.W.
        • Billingham R.P.
        • Williamson R.
        Care after colonic operation—is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 202: 45-54
        • Lassen K.
        • Hannemann P.
        • Ljungqvist O.
        • et al.
        Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries.
        BMJ. 2005; 330: 1420-1421
        • Kube R.
        • Ptok H.
        • Steinert R.
        • et al.
        Clinical value of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.
        Chirurg. 2008; 79: 1145-1150
        • Maessen J.M.
        • Dejong C.H.
        • Kessels A.G.
        • von Meyenfeldt M.F.
        Length of stay: an inappropriate readout of the success of enhanced recovery programs.
        World J Surg. 2008; 32: 971-975
        • Maessen J.
        • Dejong C.H.
        • Hausel J.
        • et al.
        A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.
        Br J Surg. 2007; 94: 224-231
        • Nygren J.
        • Soop M.
        • Thorell A.
        • Hausel J.
        • Ljungqvist O.
        An enhanced-recovery protocol improves outcome after colorectal resection already during the first year: a single-center experience in 168 consecutive patients.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52: 978-985
        • Schwenk W.
        • Gunther N.
        • Wendling P.
        • et al.
        “Fast-track” rehabilitation for elective colonic surgery in Germany—prospective observational data from a multi-centre quality assurance programme.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008; 23: 93-99
        • Kehlet H.
        Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery.
        Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009; 15: 355-358