The quality of surgical care in safety net hospitals: A systematic review

Published:December 16, 2013DOI:


      The quality of surgical care in safety net hospitals (SNHs) is not well understood owing to sparse data that have not yet been analyzed systematically. We hypothesized that on average, SNHs provide a lesser quality of care for surgery patients than non-SNHs.

      Study Design

      We performed a systematic review of published literature on quality of surgical care in SNHs in accordance with guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We searched within the PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus online databases, and included peer-reviewed, English-language, scientific papers published between 1995 and 2013 that analyzed primary or secondary data on ≥1 of the domains of quality (safety, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, patient centeredness, and equity) of surgical care in a US hospital or system that met the Institute of Medicine definition of a SNH. Each article was reviewed independently by ≥2 co-investigators. A data abstraction tool was used to record the eligibility, purpose, design, results, conclusion, and overall quality of each article reviewed. Disagreements over eligibility and data were resolved by group discussion. The main results and conclusions abstracted from the included articles were then analyzed and presented according to the quality domains addressed most clearly by each article.

      Principal Findings

      Our initial search identified 1,556 citations, of which 86 were potentially eligible for inclusion. After complete review and abstraction, only 19 of these studies met all inclusion criteria. SNHs performed significantly worse than non-SNHs in measures of timeliness and patient centeredness. Surgical care in SNHs tended to be less equitable than in non-SNHs. Data on the safety of surgical care in SNHs were inconsistent.


      Although data are limited, there seems to be need for improvement in particular aspects of the quality of surgical care provided in SNHs. Thus, SNHs should be priority settings for future quality improvement interventions in surgery. Such initiatives could have disproportionately greater impact in these lower-performing settings and would address directly any health care disparities among the poor, underserved, and most vulnerable populations in the United States.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. US Institute of Medicine (IOM) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC2001
        • Weiser T.G.
        • Regenbogen S.E.
        • Thompson K.D.
        • et al.
        An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data.
        Lancet. 2008; 372: 139-144
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Gust C.
        • Baser O.
        • Dimick J.B.
        • Sutherland J.M.
        • Skinner J.S.
        Medicare payments for common inpatient procedures: implications for episode-based payment bundling.
        Health Serv Res. 2010; 45: 1783-1795
        • Regenbogen S.E.
        • Gawande A.A.
        • Lipsitz S.R.
        • Greenberg C.C.
        • Jha A.K.
        Do differences in hospital and surgeon quality explain racial disparities in lower-extremity vascular amputation?.
        Ann Surg. 2009; 250: 424-431
        • Billingsley K.G.
        • Morris A.M.
        • Matthews B.
        • Dominitz J.A.
        • Dobie S.A.
        • Barlow W.E.
        • et al.
        Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship.
        Arch Surg. 2007; 142: 23-31
        • Birkmeyer N.J.
        • Gu N.
        • Baser O.
        • Morris A.M.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        Socioeconomic status and surgical mortality in the elderly.
        Med Care. 2008; 46: 893-899
        • Breslin T.M.
        • Morris A.M.
        • Gu N.
        • Wong S.L.
        • Finlayson E.V.
        • Banerjee M.
        • et al.
        Hospital factors and racial disparities in mortality after surgery for breast and colon cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 3945-3950
        • Lewin M.E.
        • Altman S.H.
        • US Institute of Medicine (IOM)
        America's health care safety net: intact but endangered.
        Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, DC2000
        • Bradley C.J.
        • Dahman B.
        • Shickle L.M.
        • Lee W.
        Surgery wait times and specialty services for insured and uninsured breast cancer patients: does hospital safety net status matter?.
        Health Serv Res. 2012; 47: 677-697
        • Virgo K.S.
        • Little A.G.
        • Fedewa S.A.
        • Chen A.Y.
        • Flanders W.D.
        • Ward E.M.
        Safety-net burden hospitals and likelihood of curative-intent surgery for non-small cell lung cancer.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 213: 633-643
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        • PRISMA Group
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62: 1006-1012
        • Genther D.J.
        • Gourin C.G.
        The effect of hospital safety-net burden status on short-term outcomes and cost of care after head and neck cancer surgery.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 138: 1015-1022
        • Maldonado T.S.
        • Moreno R.
        • Gagne P.J.
        • Adelman M.A.
        • Nalbandian M.M.
        • Bajakian D.
        • et al.
        Successful management of carotid stenosis in a high-risk population at an inner-city hospital.
        Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004; 38: 511-517
        • McHugh M.
        • Martin T.C.
        • Orwat J.
        • Dyke K.V.
        Medicare's policy to limit payment for hospital-acquired conditions: the impact on safety net providers.
        J Health Care Poor Underserv. 2011; 22: 638-647
        • Rhoads K.F.
        • Ackerson L.K.
        • Jha A.K.
        • Dudley R.A.
        Quality of colon cancer outcomes in hospitals with a high percentage of Medicaid patients.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 197-204
        • Blegen M.A.
        • Goode C.J.
        • Spetz J.
        • Vaughn T.
        • Park S.H.
        Nurse staffing effects on patient outcomes: safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.
        Med Care. 2011; 49: 406-414
        • Young H.
        • Bliss R.
        • Carey J.C.
        • Price C.S.
        Beyond core measures: identifying modifiable risk factors for prevention of surgical site infection after elective total abdominal hysterectomy.
        Surg Infect. 2011; 12: 491-496
        • Gabow P.A.
        • Mehler P.S.
        A broad and structured approach to improving patient safety and quality: lessons from Denver Health.
        Health Aff (Project Hope). 2011; 30: 612-618
        • Lee A.Y.
        • Carter J.J.
        • Hochberg M.S.
        • Stone A.M.
        • Cohen S.L.
        • Pachter H.L.
        The timing of surgery for cholecystitis: a review of 202 consecutive patients at a large municipal hospital.
        Am J Surg. 2008; 195: 467-470
        • Marshall L.
        • Harbin V.
        • Hooker J.
        • Oswald J.
        • Cummings L.
        Safety net hospital performance on national quality of care process measures.
        J Healthc Qual. 2012; 34: 21-31
        • McHugh M.
        • Kang R.
        • Hasnain-Wynia R.
        Understanding the safety net: inpatient quality of care varies based on how one defines safety-net hospitals.
        Med Care Res Rev. 2009; 66: 590-605
        • Ross J.S.
        • Cha S.S.
        • Epstein A.J.
        • Wang Y.
        • Bradley E.H.
        • Herrin J.
        • et al.
        Quality of care for acute myocardial infarction at urban safety-net hospitals.
        Health Aff (Project Hope). 2007; 26: 238-248
        • Kapadia M.
        • Mehri-Basha M.
        • Madhavan R.
        • Rajamani K.
        • Chaturvedi S.
        High rate of inappropriate carotid endarterectomy in an urban medical center.
        J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009; 18: 277-280
        • Atchison K.A.
        • Black E.E.
        • Leathers R.
        • Belin T.R.
        • Abrego M.
        • Gironda M.W.
        • et al.
        A qualitative report of patient problems and postoperative instructions.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 449-456
        • Sabik L.M.
        • Bradley C.J.
        Differences in mortality for surgical cancer patients by insurance and hospital safety net status.
        Med Care Res Rev. 2013; 70: 84-97
        • Madan A.K.
        • Tichansky D.S.
        • Ternovits C.A.
        • Speck K.E.
        • Steinhauer B.W.
        • Croce M.A.
        • et al.
        Establishing a laparoscopic bariatric program in a safety net hospital.
        Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 801-804
        • Bradley C.J.
        • Neumark D.
        • Shickle L.M.
        • Farrell N.
        Differences in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment: experiences of insured and uninsured women in a safety-net setting.
        Inquiry. 2008; 45: 323-339
        • Williams D.L.
        • Tortu S.
        • Thomson J.
        Factors associated with delays to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in women in a Louisiana urban safety net hospital.
        Women Health. 2010; 50: 705-718
        • Ross J.S.
        • Bernheim S.M.
        • Lin Z.
        • Drye E.E.
        • Chen J.
        • Normand S.L.
        • et al.
        Based on key measures, care quality for Medicare enrollees at safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals was almost equal.
        Health Aff (Project Hope). 2012; 31: 1739-1748
        • Werner R.M.
        • Goldman L.E.
        • Dudley R.A.
        Comparison of change in quality of care between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.
        JAMA. 2008; 299: 2180-2187
        • Goldman L.E.
        • Vittinghoff E.
        • Dudley R.A.
        Quality of care in hospitals with a high percent of Medicaid patients.
        Med Care. 2007; 45: 579-583
        • Morris A.M.
        • Rhoads K.F.
        • Stain S.C.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        Understanding racial disparities in cancer treatment and outcomes.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 211: 105-113
        • Morris A.
        Measuring quality in colorectal surgery is only the first step in the more important goal of improving quality.
        Br Med J. 2011; 343: d4859