Advertisement

Referring physicians' decision making for pediatric anti-reflux procedures

Published:December 18, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.014

      Background

      Rates of anti-reflux procedures (ARP) vary greatly among pediatric hospitals. How pediatric subspecialists make referral decisions for ARPs has not been described. The aim of this study was to characterize pediatric subspecialists' decision making for referring children for ARPs.

      Methods

      Pediatric subspecialists at a single children's hospital were interviewed about their decision making when referring for ARPs. Qualitative analysis was performed on clinicians' perceptions of the risks and benefits of the treatment options. Clinical algorithms were derived from each interview and were compared using the Clinical Algorithm Nosology. Clinical Algorithm Structural Analysis (CASA) scores were calculated to assess algorithm complexity. Clinical Algorithm Patient Abstraction (CAPA) scores on a scale from 0 (different) to 10 (identical) were generated based on algorithm agreement.

      Results

      The interviews yielded 15 algorithms. There was substantial variation in the providers' perceived risks and benefits of the treatment options. CASA scores ranged from 8 to 28 and CAPA scores ranged from 0 to 5.7 (median, 0), indicating great variation in both complexity and patient management. Management variation included testing (33% of algorithms incorporated pH probe test, 67% upper gastrointestinal, and 47% small bowel follow-through), procedure contraindications (33% considered history of gagging a contraindication to ARP), and use of gastrojejunostomy tubes (20% using gastrojejunostomy tube before ARP).

      Conclusion

      No standards exist for the decision to refer children with gastroesophageal reflux disease for ARP. There is great variation among pediatric subspecialists in their decision making. Differences in providers' perception of the risks and benefits of these procedures contribute to this variation.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fisher E.S.
        • Wennberg D.E.
        • Stukel T.A.
        • Gottlieb D.J.
        • Lucas F.L.
        • Pinder E.L.
        The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care.
        Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138 ([Summary for patients in Ann Intern Med 2003;138:I49]): 288-298
        • Fisher E.S.
        • Wennberg D.E.
        • Stukel T.A.
        • Gottlieb D.J.
        • Lucas F.L.
        • Pinder E.L.
        The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.
        Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138 ([Summary for patients in Ann Intern Med 2003;138:I36]): 273-287
      1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Key themes and highlights from the National Healthcare Quality Report. US Department of Health and Human Services [updated 2007]. Available from: http://archive.ahrq.gov/qual/nhqr07/Key.htm-Key-Edn1.

        • Goldin A.B.
        • Garrison M.
        • Christakis D.
        Variations between hospitals in antireflux procedures in children.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163: 658-663
        • Campanozzi A.
        • Boccia G.
        • Pensabene L.
        • Panetta F.
        • Marseglia A.
        • Strisciuglio P.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and natural history of gastroesophageal reflux: pediatric prospective survey.
        Pediatrics. 2009; 123: 779-783
        • Fonkalsrud E.W.
        • Ament M.E.
        Gastroesophageal reflux in childhood.
        Curr Probl Surg. 1996; 33: 1-70
        • Vandenplas Y.
        • Rudolph C.D.
        • Di Lorenzo C.
        • Hassall E.
        • Liptak G.
        • Mazur L.
        • et al.
        Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN).
        J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009; 49: 498-547
        • Fortunato J.E.
        • Darbari A.
        • Mitchell S.E.
        • Thompson R.E.
        • Cuffari C.
        The limitations of gastro-jejunal (G-J) feeding tubes in children: a 9-year pediatric hospital database analysis.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100: 186-189
        • Godbole P.
        • Margabanthu G.
        • Crabbe D.C.
        • Thomas A.
        • Puntis J.W.
        • Abel G.
        • et al.
        Limitations and uses of gastrojejunal feeding tubes.
        Arch Dis Child. 2002; 86: 134-137
        • Friedman J.N.
        • Ahmed S.
        • Connolly B.
        • Chait P.
        • Mahant S.
        Complications associated with image-guided gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy tubes in children.
        Pediatrics. 2004; 114: 458-461
        • Mahant S.
        • Pastor A.C.
        • Deoliveira L.
        • Nicholas D.B.
        • Langer J.C.
        Well-being of children with neurologic impairment after fundoplication and gastrojejunostomy tube feeding.
        Pediatrics. 2011; 128: e395-e403
        • Srivastava R.
        • Downey E.C.
        • O'Gorman M.
        • Feola P.
        • Samore M.
        • Holubkov R.
        • et al.
        Impact of fundoplication versus gastrojejunal feeding tubes on mortality and in preventing aspiration pneumonia in young children with neurologic impairment who have gastroesophageal reflux disease.
        Pediatrics. 2009; 123: 338-345
        • Wales P.W.
        • Diamond I.R.
        • Dutta S.
        • Muraca S.
        • Chait P.
        • Connolly B.
        • et al.
        Fundoplication and gastrostomy versus image-guided gastrojejunal tube for enteral feeding in neurologically impaired children with gastroesophageal reflux.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2002; 37: 407-412
        • Vernon-Roberts A.
        • Sullivan P.B.
        Fundoplication versus post-operative medication for gastro-oesophageal reflux in children with neurological impairment undergoing gastrostomy.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; : CD006151
        • Lasser M.S.
        • Liao J.G.
        • Burd R.S.
        National trends in the use of antireflux procedures for children.
        Pediatrics. 2006; 118: 1828-1835
        • LaRiviere C.A.
        • Parimi C.
        • Huaco J.C.
        • Acierno S.A.
        • Garrison M.M.
        • Goldin A.B.
        Variations in preoperative decision making for antireflux procedures in pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease: a survey of pediatric surgeons.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46: 1093-1098
        • Margolis C.Z.
        Proposal for clinical algorithm standards. Society for Medical Decision Making Committee on Standardization of Clinical Algorithms.
        Med Decis Making. 1992; 12: 149-154
        • Pearson S.D.
        • Margolis C.Z.
        • Davis S.
        • Schreier L.K.
        • Gottlieb L.K.
        The clinical algorithm nosology: a method for comparing algorithmic guidelines.
        Med Decis Making. 1992; 12: 123-131
        • Fox D.
        • Barnard J.
        • Campagna E.J.
        • Dickinson L.M.
        • Bruny J.
        • Kempe A.
        Fundoplication and the pediatric surgeon: implications for shared decision-making and the medical home.
        Acad Pediatr. 2012; 12: 558-566
        • Lightdale J.
        • Gremse D.A.
        Gastroesophageal reflux. Management guidance for the pediatrician.
        Pediatrics. 2013; 131: 1684-1695
      2. Gastroesophageal reflux disease [updated 2013]. Available from: Kidshealth.org.

        • Coran A.G.
        • Caldomone A.
        • Adzick S.N.
        • Krummell T.M.
        • Laberge J.M.
        • Shamberger R.
        Pediatric surgery.
        7th ed. Elsevier, New York2012
        • Rice-Townsend S.
        • Chen C.
        • Barnes J.
        • Rangel S.
        Variation in practice patterns and resource utilization surrounding management of intussusception at freestanding Children's Hospitals.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2013; 48: 104-110
        • Charles C.
        • Gafni A.
        • Whelan T.
        Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).
        Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44: 681-692
      3. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Aligning incentives in Medicare: a report to congress. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Washington, DC2010
        • O'Connor A.M.
        • Bennett C.L.
        • Stacey D.
        • Barry M.
        • Col N.F.
        • Eden K.B.
        • et al.
        Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; : CD001431
        • Fiks A.G.
        • Mayne S.
        • Localio A.R.
        • Alessandrini E.A.
        • Guevara J.P.
        Shared decision-making and health care expenditures among children with special health care needs.
        Pediatrics. 2012; 129: 99-107