Advertisement
Oncology| Volume 157, ISSUE 1, P72-78, January 2015

High pressure does not counterbalance the advantages of open techniques over closed techniques during heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin

      Background

      Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) treats residual microscopic disease after cytoreductive surgery. In experimental models, the open HIPEC technique has shown a higher and more homogenous concentration of platinum in the peritoneum than achieved using the closed technique. A 25-cm H2O pressure enhances the penetration of oxaliplatin. Because pressure is easier to set up with the closed technique, high pressure may counterbalance the drawbacks of this technique versus open HIPEC, and a higher pressure may induce a higher penetration. Because higher concentration does not mean deeper penetration, a study of tissues beneath the peritoneum is required. Finally, achieving a deeper penetration (and a higher concentration) raises the question of the passage of drugs through the surgical glove and the surgeon's safety.

      Methods

      Four groups of pigs underwent HIPEC with oxaliplatin (150 mg/L) for 30 minutes in open isobaric pressure and pressure at 25 cm H2O, and closed pressure at 25 and 40 cm H2O. Systemic absorption and peritoneal mapping of the concentration of platinum were analyzed, as well as in the retroperitoneal tissue and the surgical gloves.

      Results

      Blood concentrations were higher in open groups. In the parietal surfaces, the concentrations were not different between the isobaric and the closed groups (47.08, 56.39, and 48.57 mg/kg, respectively), but were higher in the open high-pressure group (85.93 mg/kg). In the visceral surfaces, they were lower in the closed groups (3.2 and 3.05 mg/kg) than in the open groups (7.03 and 9.56 mg/kg). Platinum concentrations were similar in the deep retroperitoneal tissue when compared between isobaric and high-pressure procedures. No platin was detected in the internal aspect of the gloves.

      Conclusion

      The use of high pressure during HIPEC does not counterbalance the drawbacks of closed techniques. The tissue concentration of oxaliplatin achieved with the open techniques is higher, even if high pressure is applied during a closed technique. Open 25 cm H2O HIPEC achieved the highest tissue penetration of oxaliplatin, but did not enhance the depth of oxaliplatin penetration. High pressure did not enhance the risk of HIPEC.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Elias D.
        • Lefevre J.H.
        • Chevalier J.
        • et al.
        Complete cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia with oxaliplatin for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin.
        J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 681-685
        • Verwaal V.J.
        • van Ruth S.
        • de Bree E.
        • et al.
        Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 3737-3743
        • Cao C.
        • Yan T.D.
        • Black D.
        • et al.
        A systematic review and meta-analysis of cytoreductive surgery with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 2152-2165
        • Esquivel J.
        • Elias D.
        • Baratti D.
        • et al.
        Consensus statement on the loco regional treatment of colorectal cancer with peritoneal dissemination.
        J Surg Oncol. 2008; 98: 263-267
        • Ortega-Deballon P.
        • Facy O.
        • Jambet S.
        • et al.
        Which method to deliver heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin? An experimental comparison of open and closed techniques.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 1957-1963
        • Elias D.
        • Antoun S.
        • Raynard B.
        • Puizillout J.M.
        • Sabourin J.C.
        • Ducreux M.
        • et al.
        Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis using complete excision and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia. A phase I-II study defining the best technical procedures.
        Chirurgie. 1999; 124: 380-389
        • Facy O.
        • Al Samman S.
        • Magnin G.
        • Ghiringhelli F.
        • Ladoire S.
        • Chauffert B.
        • et al.
        Pressure enhances the effect of hyperthermia in intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin: an experimental study.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 256: 1084-1088
        • Esquis P.
        • Consolo D.
        • Magnin G.
        • et al.
        High intra-abdominal pressure enhances the penetration and antitumor effect of intraperitoneal cisplatin on experimental peritoneal carcinomatosis.
        Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 106-112
        • Gesson-Paute A.
        • Ferron G.
        • Thomas F.
        • et al.
        Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin during open versus laparoscopically assisted heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): an experimental study.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15: 339-344
        • Benoit L.
        • Cheynel N.
        • Ortega-Deballon P.
        • et al.
        Closed hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with open abdomen: a novel technique to reduce exposure of the surgical team to chemotherapy drugs.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15: 542-546
        • Elias D.
        • Gilly F.
        • Boutitie F.
        • Quenet F.
        • Bereder J.M.
        • Mansvelt B.
        • et al.
        Peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis treated with surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of 523 patients from a multicentric French study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 63-68
        • Piché N.
        • Leblond F.A.
        • Sidéris L.
        • et al.
        Rationale for heating oxaliplatin for the intraperitoneal treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. A study of the effect of heat on intraperitoneal oxaliplatin using a murine model.
        Ann Surg. 2011; 254: 138-144
        • Elias D.
        • Bonnay M.
        • Puizillou J.M.
        • et al.
        Heated intraoperative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin after complete resection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution.
        Ann Oncol. 2002; 13: 267-272
        • Ferron G.
        • Dattez S.
        • Gladieff L.
        • et al.
        Pharmacokinetics of heated intraperitoneal oxaliplatin.
        Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008; 62: 679-683
        • Elias D.
        • Raynard B.
        • Bonnay M.
        • et al.
        Heated intra-operative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin alone and in combination with intraperitoneal irinotecan: pharmacologic studies.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006; 32: 607-613
        • Klaver Y.L.
        • Hendriks T.
        • Lomme R.M.
        • et al.
        Hyperthermia and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: an experimental study.
        Ann Surg. 2011; 254: 125-130
        • Thomas F.
        • Ferron G.
        • Gesson-Paute A.
        • et al.
        Increased tissue diffusion of oxaliplatin during laparoscopically assisted versus open heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15: 3623-3624
        • Jacquet P.
        • Sugarbaker P.H.
        Peritoneal-plasma barrier.
        Cancer Treat Res. 1996; 82: 53-63
        • Jacquet P.
        • Stuart O.A.
        • Chang D.
        • et al.
        Effects of intra-abdominal pressure on pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of doxorubicin after intraperitoneal administration.
        Anticancer Drugs. 1996; 7: 596-603
        • Heldin C.H.
        • Rubin K.
        • Pietras K.
        • et al.
        High interstitial fluid pressure: an obstacle in cancer therapy.
        Nat Rev Cancer. 2004; 4: 806-813
        • de Lima Vazquez V.
        • Stuart O.A.
        • Mohamed F.
        • Sugarbaker P.H.
        Extent of parietal peritonectomy does not change intraperitoneal chemotherapy pharmacokinetics.
        Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003; 52: 108-112