Advertisement
Hernia| Volume 157, ISSUE 2, P304-311, February 2015

Pain control with ultrasound-guided inguinal field block compared with spinal anesthesia after hernia surgery: A randomized trial

      Background

      Inguinal field block (IFB) is a recommended technique for pain control after inguinal hernia repair but is also underused by surgeons. Currently, there is no decisive evidence on which technique, IFB or spinal anesthesia block (SAB), provides better pain control during the first day after hernia repair. In this study, we compared ultrasound-guided IFB performed by anesthesiologists and SAB for pain control during the first day after hernia repair.

      Methods

      We compared static and dynamic pain scores measured with a numerical rating scale in 86 male patients scheduled for elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair with either ultrasound-guided IFB (n = 42) or SAB (n = 44).

      Results

      Dynamic and static pain at 4 hours (P < .01, r > 0.34, “large effect size”), and dynamic pain the morning after operation (P = .04, r > 0.20, “medium effect size”) were less in the field block group compared with the SAB group. Postoperative analgesic consumption was reduced during hospital stay (P = .005, r > 0.34, “large effect size”) and for 7 postoperative days in the field block group (P = .03, r > 0.20, “medium effect size”).

      Conclusion

      In this study, ultrasound-guided IFB provided lesser dynamic pain scores during the first postoperative day and reduced use of analgesics for 1 week compared with spinal anesthesia after inguinal hernia repair. Our technique could become a substitute performed by anesthesiologists in settings in which IFB is not performed routinely by surgeons.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Callesen T.
        • Bech K.
        • Nielsen R.
        • Andersen J.
        • Hesselfeldt P.
        • Roikjaer O.
        • et al.
        Pain after groin hernia repair.
        Br J Surg. 1998; 85: 1412-1424
        • Joshi G.P.
        • Rawal N.
        • Kehlet H.
        • PROSPECT collaboration
        • Bonnet F.
        • Camu F.
        • et al.
        Evidence-based management of postoperative pain in adults undergoing open inguinal hernia surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2012; 99: 168-185
        • Neumayer L.
        • Giobbie-Hurder A.
        • Jonasson O.
        • Fitzgibbons Jr., R.
        • Dunlop D.
        • Gibbs J.
        • et al.
        Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1819-1927
        • Bay-Nielsen M.
        • Kehlet H.
        • Strand L.
        • Malmstrøm J.
        • Andersen F.H.
        • Wara P.
        • et al.
        • Danish Hernia Database Collaboration
        Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study.
        Lancet. 2001; 358: 1124-1128
        • Ferrante F.
        • Rusconi A.
        • Galimberti A.
        • Grassi M.
        • Lombardia Hernia Study Group
        Hernia repair in the Lombardy region in 2000: preliminary results.
        Hernia. 2004; 8: 247-251
        • Mokini Z.
        • Vitale G.
        • Costantini A.
        • Fumagalli R.
        The Flying Publisher guide to ultrasound blocks for the anterior abdominal wall and implementation of adult and pediatric surgery.
        1st ed. Bernd Kamps Steinhäuser-Verlag, Verlag2011
        • Eichenberger U.
        • Greher M.
        • Kirchmair L.
        • Curatolo M.
        • Moriggl B.
        Ultrasound-guided blocks of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve: accuracy of a selective new technique confirmed by anatomical dissection.
        Br J Anaesth. 2006; 97: 238-243
        • Andersen F.H.
        • Nielsen K.
        • Kehlet H.
        Combined ilioinguinal blockade and local infiltration anesthesia for groin herniorraphy—a double-blind randomised study.
        Br J Anaesth. 2005; 94: 520-523
        • Yndgaard S.
        • Holst P.
        • Bjerre-Jepsen K.
        • Thomsen C.B.
        • Struckmann J.
        • Mogensen T.
        Subcutaneously versus subfascially administered lidocaine in pain treatment after inguinal herniotomy.
        Anesth Analg. 1994; 79: 324-327
        • El-Radaideh K.M.
        • Al-Ghazo M.A.
        • Bani-Hani K.E.
        Combined subfascial and subcutaneous bupivacaine instillation for inguinal hernia wounds.
        Asian J Surg. 2006; 29: 242-246
        • Rab M.
        • Ebmer J.
        • Dellon A.L.
        Anatomic variability of the ilioinguinal and genitofemoral nerve: implications for the treatment of groin pain.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108: 1618-1623
        • Chung F.
        • Chan V.W.
        • Ong D.
        A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery.
        J Clin Anesth. 1995; 7: 500-506
        • McCarthy M.
        • Jonasson O.
        • Chang C.H.
        • Pickard A.S.
        • Giobbie-Hurder A.
        • Gibbs J.
        • et al.
        Assessment of patient functional status after surgery.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201: 171-178
      1. IBM. How to calculate sample size for the Mann-Whitney-U test based on the sample size for the Student test? Available from: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21478271.

        • Fritz C.
        • Morris P.
        Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.
        J Exp Psychol. 2012; 1: 1-18
        • Nordin P.
        • Zetterstrom H.
        • Gunnarsson U.
        • Nilsson E.
        Local, regional or general anesthesia in groin hernia repair: multicenter randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2003; 362: 853-858
        • Song D.
        • Greilich N.B.
        • White P.F.
        • Watcha M.F.
        • Tongier W.K.
        Recovery profiles and costs of anesthesia for outpatient unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy.
        Anesth Analg. 2000; 91: 876-881
        • Malazgirt Z.
        • Ozkan K.
        • Dervisoglu A.
        • Kaya E.
        Comparison of Stoppa and Lichtenstein techniques in the repair of bilateral inguinal hernias.
        Hernia. 2000; 4: 264-267
        • Ozgün H.
        • Kurt M.N.
        • Kurt I.
        • Çevikel M.H.
        Comparison of local, spinal, and general anesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy.
        Eur J Surg. 2002; 168: 455-459
        • Khasawneh M.A.
        • Nassan W.A.
        • Smadi S.I.
        Local anesthesia with propofol infusion versus spinal anesthesia for groin hernia repair.
        J Bahrain Med Soc. 2004; 16: 128-132
        • Gultekin F.A.
        • Kurukahvecioglu O.
        • Karamercan A.
        • Ege B.
        • Ersoy E.
        • Tatlicioglu E.
        A prospective comparison of local and spinal anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair.
        Hernia. 2007; 11: 153-156
        • Horwitz M.
        The anatomy of the lumbosacral nerve plexus. Its relation to variations in vertebral segmentation and the posterior sacral nerve plexus.
        Anat Rec. 1939; 74: 91-109
        • Aasbo V.
        • Thuen A.
        • Raeder J.
        Improved long-lasting postoperative analgesia, recovery function and patient satisfaction after inguinal herniorraphy with inguinal field block compared with general anesthesia.
        Acta Anaesthiol Scand. 2002; 46: 674-678
        • Lim S.L.
        • Ng Sb A.
        • Tan G.M.
        Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block revisited: single shot versus double shot technique for herniorraphy in children.
        Pediatr Anaesth. 2002; 12: 255-260