Advertisement

Impact of gastrectomy procedural complexity on surgical outcomes and hospital comparisons

      Background

      Most risk adjustment approaches adjust for patient comorbidities and the primary procedure. However, procedures done at the same time as the index case may increase operative risk and merit inclusion in adjustment models for fair hospital comparisons. Our objectives were to evaluate the impact of surgical complexity on postoperative outcomes and hospital comparisons in gastric cancer surgery.

      Methods

      Patients who underwent gastric resection for cancer were identified from a large clinical dataset. Procedure complexity was characterized using secondary procedure CPT codes and work relative value units (RVUs). Regression models were developed to evaluate the association between complexity variables and outcomes. The impact of complexity adjustment on model performance and hospital comparisons was examined.

      Results

      Among 3,467 patients who underwent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma, 2,171 operations were distal and 1,296 total. A secondary procedure was reported for 33% of distal gastrectomies and 59% of total gastrectomies. Six of 10 secondary procedures were associated with adverse outcomes. For example, patients who underwent a synchronous bowel resection had a higher risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% CI, 1.07–4.29) and reoperation (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.26–3.47). Model performance was slightly better for nearly all outcomes with complexity adjustment (mortality c-statistics: standard model, 0.853; secondary procedure model, 0.858; RVU model, 0.855). Hospital ranking did not change substantially after complexity adjustment.

      Conclusion

      Surgical complexity variables are associated with adverse outcomes in gastrectomy, but complexity adjustment does not affect hospital rankings appreciably.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • Liu Y.
        • Paruch J.L.
        • Zhou L.
        • Kmiecik T.E.
        • Ko C.Y.
        • et al.
        Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 217: 833-842.e1–3
        • Shah R.
        • Velanovich V.
        • Syed Z.
        • Swartz A.
        • Rubinfeld I.
        Limitations of patient-associated co-morbidity model in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic operations.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16: 986-992
        • Merkow R.P.
        • Bentrem D.J.
        • Cohen M.E.
        • Paruch J.L.
        • Weber S.M.
        • Ko C.Y.
        • et al.
        Effect of cancer surgery complexity on short-term outcomes, risk predictions, and hospital comparisons.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 217: 685-693
        • Paruch J.L.
        • Merkow R.P.
        • Bentrem D.J.
        • Ko C.Y.
        • Posner M.C.
        • Cohen M.E.
        • et al.
        Impact of hepatectomy surgical complexity on outcomes and hospital quality rankings.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21: 1773-1780
        • Khuri S.F.
        The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery.
        Surgery. 2005; 138: 837-843
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Henderson W.G.
        • Daley J.
        • Jonasson O.
        • Jones R.S.
        • Campbell Jr., D.A.
        • et al.
        Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.
        Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 329-336
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Henderson W.G.
        • Daley J.
        • Jonasson O.
        • Jones R.S.
        • Campbell Jr., D.A.
        • et al.
        The Patient Safety in Surgery Study: background, study design, and patient populations.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204: 1089-1102
      1. American Medical Association. RBRVS: the resource-based relative value scale. Chicago: American Medical Association.

        • Cohen M.E.
        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • Ko C.Y.
        • Richards K.
        • Hall B.L.
        Variability in length of stay after colorectal surgery: assessment of 182 hospitals in the national surgical quality improvement program.
        Ann Surg. 2009; 250: 901-907
        • Cohen M.E.
        • Ko C.Y.
        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • Zhou L.
        • Huffman K.
        • Wang X.
        • et al.
        Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 217: 336-346.e1
        • Akaike H.
        A new look at the statistical model identification.
        IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1974; 19: 716-723
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Siewers A.E.
        • Finlayson E.V.
        • Stukel T.A.
        • Lucas F.L.
        • Batista I.
        • et al.
        Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1128-1137
        • Smith D.L.
        • Elting L.S.
        • Learn P.A.
        • Raut C.P.
        • Mansfield P.F.
        Factors influencing the volume-outcome relationship in gastrectomies: a population-based study.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14: 1846-1852
        • Gordon T.A.
        • Bowman H.M.
        • Bass E.B.
        • Lillemoe K.D.
        • Yeo C.J.
        • Heitmiller R.F.
        • et al.
        Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes.
        J Am Coll Surg. 1999; 189: 46-56
        • McCrum M.L.
        • Lipsitz S.R.
        • Berry W.R.
        • Jha A.K.
        • Gawande A.A.
        Beyond volume: does hospital complexity matter?: an analysis of inpatient surgical mortality in the United States.
        Med Care. 2014; 52: 235-242
        • Maxwell S.
        • Zuckerman S.
        Impact of resource-based practice expenses on the Medicare physician volume.
        Health Care Financ Rev. 2007; 29: 65-79
        • Raval M.V.
        • Cohen M.E.
        • Ingraham A.M.
        • Dimick J.B.
        • Osborne N.H.
        • Hamilton B.H.
        • et al.
        Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 211: 715-723