Adherence to prophylactic antibiotics guidelines is challenging and poorly documented. We hypothesized that a multiphase, multifaceted quality improvement initiative would engage relevant stakeholders, address known barriers to adoption, and improve overall adherence.
From 2011 to 2014, a series of interventions were introduced in the pediatric operating rooms. After each interventional period, prospective assessments were performed to record the antibiotic type, dose, timing, and redosing according to the guidelines. Perioperative factors that may influence guideline adherence were analyzed. Spearman's rank correlation, analysis of variance, and χ2 tests were performed.
A total of 1,052 operations were observed, and 629 (60%) required prophylactic antibiotics. Adherence to all 4 guideline components remained unchanged (54−55%, P = .38). Redosing significantly improved (7−53%, P = .02), but correct type decreased (98−70%, P < .01). The percentage of cases in which only one antibiotic guideline component was missed remained unchanged (35−34%, P = .46). Adherence to guidelines was not significantly associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists class, surgical specialty, patient weight, anesthesia provider, or surgical wound class.
Despite multiple interventions to improve antibiotic prophylaxis, overall adherence did not improve. Most interventions were directed at the point of administration in the operating room; future implementation strategies should focus on the perioperative setting.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Surgery
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.Am J Infect Control. 1999; 27: 97-132
- Hospitals collaborate to decrease surgical site infections.Am J Surg. 2005; 190: 9-15
- Efficacy of protocol implementation on incidence of wound infection in colorectal operations.J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205: 432-438
- Surgeon compensation: “Pay for performance,” the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, the Surgical Care Improvement Program, and other considerations.Surgery. 2005; 138: 829-836
- Reducing the risk of SSIs did we really think SCIP was going to lead us to the promised land.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011; 12: 169-177
- Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the Surgical Care Improvement Program.Ann Surg. 2011; 254: 494-499
- Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections.JAMA. 2010; 303: 2479-2485
- Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement.J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 211: 705-714
- Beyond surgical care improvement program compliance: antibiotic prophylaxis implementation gaps.Am J Surg. 2013; 206: 451-456
- A framework for training health professionals in implementation and dissemination science.Acad Med. 2012; 87: 271-278
- Multifaceted interventions improve adherence to the surgical checklist.Surgery. 2014; 156: 336-344
- The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery.Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 43: 322-330
- Research into practice I From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care.Lancet. 2003; 362: 1225-1230
- Toward evidence-based quality improvement: evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998.J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: S14-S20
- How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability.Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 26
- The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication prescription errors and clinical outcome in pediatric and intensive care: a systematic review.Pediatrics. 2009; 123: 1184-1190
- Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE- AIM framework.Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 1322-1327
So JP, Aleem IS, Tsang DS, Matlow AG, Wright JG. Increasing compliance with an antibiotic prophylaxis guideline to prevent pediatric surgical site infection: before and after study. Ann Surg [epub ahead of print].
- Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care.N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 53-56
- American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric: a phase 1 report.J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 212: 1-11
- Improving quality improvement: a methodologic framework for evaluating effectiveness of surgical quality improvement.J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208: 621-626
Published online: June 05, 2015
Accepted: April 10, 2015
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.