Advertisement
Central Surgical Association| Volume 160, ISSUE 4, P987-996, October 2016

Frailty predicts risk of life-threatening complications and mortality after pancreatic resections

Published:August 18, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.07.010

      Background

      To assess the effect of frailty on morbidity and mortality after partial pancreatectomy.

      Methods

      A retrospective analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Project from 2005–2010 was conducted. A modified frailty index was created based on previously validated methodology. Patients were classified as nonfrail, low frailty, intermediate frailty, and frail. Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy were examined.

      Results

      In the study, 13,020 patients were analyzed (8,729 pancreatoduodenectomy and 4,291 distal pancreatectomy). Among the pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy patients, frail patients regardless of the degree of frailty were older, more likely male, had a greater body mass index, lower serum albumin, and greater weight loss compared with the nonfrail patients (all P ≤ .05). Postoperatively, a stepwise increased risk of grade 4 complications (Clavien/Dindo) and mortality was noted from nonfrail to frail patients. Every 1-point increase in modified frailty index was associated with a significantly increased risk of grade 4 complications (∼2–6 times) and mortality (∼2–10 times) from low-frail to frail (adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, albumin, weight loss, and type of pancreatectomy). An abbreviated frailty index incorporating 8 variables was as predictive as the modified frailty index (P = .68).

      Conclusion

      An 11-point frailty index as measured in National Surgical Quality Improvement Project predicts serious complications and death after pancreatectomy. A modification of this index with 8 factors continues to have similar predictive ability. Consideration of frailty may be beneficial prior to the pancreatic surgeon and particularly in discussion of operative risk and selection of patients who might receive benefit from pre-operative optimization.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ragulin-Coyne E.
        • Carroll J.E.
        • Smith J.K.
        • Witkowski E.R.
        • Ng S.C.
        • Shah S.A.
        • et al.
        Perioperative mortality after pancreatectomy: a risk score to aid decision-making.
        Surgery. 2012; 152: S120-S127
        • Sirri E.
        • Castro F.A.
        • Kieschke J.
        • Jansen L.
        • Emrich K.
        • Gondos A.
        • et al.
        Recent trends in survival of patients with pancreatic cancer in Germany and the United States.
        Pancreas. 2016; 45: 908-914
        • Scally C.P.
        • Yin H.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Wong S.L.
        Comparing perioperative processes of care in high and low mortality centers performing pancreatic surgery.
        J Surg Oncol. 2015; 112: 866-871
        • Nanashima A.
        • Abo T.
        • Kunizaki M.
        • Takeshita H.
        • Hidaka S.
        • Sawai T.
        • et al.
        Portal vein anastomosis with parachute method in hepatectomy and pancreatectomy.
        Hepatogastroenterology. 2012; 59: 1000-1002
        • Charlson M.E.
        • Pompei P.
        • Ales K.L.
        • MacKenzie C.R.
        A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
        J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 373-383
        • Fried L.P.
        • Ferrucci L.
        • Darer J.
        • Williamson J.D.
        • Anderson G.
        Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004; 59: 255-263
        • Rockwood K.
        • Song X.
        • MacKnight C.
        • Bergman H.
        • Hogan D.B.
        • McDowell I.
        • et al.
        A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.
        CMAJ. 2005; 173: 489-495
        • Velanovich V.
        • Antoine H.
        • Swartz A.
        • Peters D.
        • Rubinfeld I.
        Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database.
        J Surg Res. 2013; 183: 104-110
        • Fried L.P.
        • Tangen C.M.
        • Walston J.
        • Newman A.B.
        • Hirsch C.
        • Gottdiener J.
        • et al.
        Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001; 56: M146-M156
      1. Program ACoSNSQI. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip. Accessed on March 1, 2016.

        • Karam J.
        • Tsiouris A.
        • Shepard A.
        • Velanovich V.
        • Rubinfeld I.
        Simplified frailty index to predict adverse outcomes and mortality in vascular surgery patients.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2013; 27: 904-908
        • Uppal S.
        • Igwe E.
        • Rice L.W.
        • Spencer R.J.
        • Rose S.L.
        Frailty index predicts severe complications in gynecologic oncology patients.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 137: 98-101
        • Dindo D.
        • Demartines N.
        • Clavien P.A.
        Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.
        Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 205-213
        • Webb S.
        • Rubinfeld I.
        • Velanovich V.
        • Horst H.M.
        • Reickert C.
        Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data for risk adjustment to compare Clavien 4 and 5 complications in open and laparoscopic colectomy.
        Surgical Endoscopy. 2012; 26: 732-737
        • Mitnitski A.B.
        • Mogilner A.J.
        • Rockwood K.
        Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging.
        Scientific World Journal. 2001; 1: 323-336
        • Sur M.D.
        • Namm J.P.
        • Hemmerich J.A.
        • Buschmann M.M.
        • Roggin K.K.
        • Dale W.
        Radiographic sarcopenia and self-reported exhaustion independently predict NSQIP serious complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in older adults.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22: 3897-3904
        • Bortz 2nd, W.M.
        A conceptual framework of frailty: a review.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002; 57: M283-M288
        • Watanabe J.
        • Otani S.
        • Sakamoto T.
        • Arai Y.
        • Hanaki T.
        • Amisaki M.
        • et al.
        Prognostic indicators based on inflammatory and nutritional factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.
        Surg Today. 2016; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Dias-Santos D.
        • Ferrone C.R.
        • Zheng H.
        • Lillemoe K.D.
        • Fernandez-Del Castillo C.
        The Charlson age comorbidity index predicts early mortality after surgery for pancreatic cancer.
        Surgery. 2015; 157: 881-887
        • Epelboym I.
        • Gawlas I.
        • Lee J.A.
        • Schrope B.
        • Chabot J.A.
        • Allendorf J.D.
        Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module.
        World J Surg. 2014; 38: 1461-1467
        • Dale W.
        • Hemmerich J.
        • Kamm A.
        • Posner M.C.
        • Matthews J.B.
        • Rothman R.
        • et al.
        Geriatric assessment improves prediction of surgical outcomes in older adults undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective cohort study.
        Ann Surg. 2014; 259: 960-965
        • Tamirisa N.P.
        • Parmar A.D.
        • Vargas G.M.
        • Mehta H.B.
        • Kilbane E.M.
        • Hall B.L.
        • et al.
        Relative contributions of complications and failure to rescue on mortality in older patients undergoing pancreatectomy.
        Ann Surg. 2016; 263: 385-391