Advertisement

Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: A position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)

Published:December 24, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.021

      Background

      Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (grades B and C of the ISGPS definition) remains the most troublesome complication after pancreatoduodenectomy. The approach to management of the pancreatic remnant via some form of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis determines the incidence and severity of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. Despite numerous trials comparing diverse pancreatico-enteric anastomosis techniques and other adjunctive strategies (pancreatic duct stenting, somatostatin analogues, etc), currently, there is no clear consensus regarding the ideal method of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis.

      Methods

      An international panel of pancreatic surgeons working in well-known, high-volume centers reviewed the best contemporary literature concerning pancreatico-enteric anastomosis and worked to develop a position statement on pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy.

      Results

      There is inherent risk assumed by creating a pancreatico-enteric anastomosis based on factors related to the gland (eg, parenchymal texture, disease pathology). None of the technical variations of pancreaticojejunal or pancreaticogastric anastomosis, such as duct-mucosa, invagination method, and binding technique, have been found to be consistently superior to another. Randomized trials and meta-analyses comparing pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy yield conflicting results and are inherently prone to bias due to marked heterogeneity in the studies. The benefit of stenting the pancreatico-enteric anastomosis to decrease clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula is not supported by high-level evidence. While controversial, somatostatin analogues appear to decrease perioperative complications but not mortality, although consistent data across the more than 20 studies addressing this topic are lacking. The Fistula Risk Score is useful for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula as well as for comparing outcomes of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis across studies.

      Conclusion

      Currently, no specific technique can eliminate development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. While consistent practice of any standardized technique may decrease the rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, experienced surgeons can have lower postoperative pancreatic fistula rates performing a variety of techniques depending on the clinical situation. There is no clear evidence on the benefit of internal or external stenting after pancreatico-enteric anastomosis. The use of somatostatin analogues may be important in decreasing morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy, but it remains controversial. Future studies should focus on novel approaches to decrease the rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula with appropriate risk adjustment.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Büchler M.W.
        • Wagner M.
        • Schmied B.M.
        • Uhl W.
        • Friess H.
        • Z'graggen K.
        Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy.
        Arch Surg. 2003; 138: 1310-1314
        • Bassi C.
        • Dervenis C.
        • Butturini G.
        • Fingerhut A.
        • Yeo C.
        • Izbicki J.
        • et al.
        • International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula definition
        Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.
        Surgery. 2005; 138: 8-13
        • McMillan M.T.
        • Soi S.
        • Asbun H.J.
        • Ball C.G.
        • Bassi C.
        • Beane J.D.
        • et al.
        Risk-adjusted outcomes of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a model for performance evaluation.
        Ann Surg. 2016; 264: 344-352
        • Gouma D.J.
        • van Geenen R.C.
        • van Gulik T.M.
        • de Haan R.J.
        • de Wit L.T.
        • Busch O.R.
        • et al.
        Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume.
        Ann Surg. 2000; 232: 786-795
        • Bassi C.
        • Marchegiani G.
        • Dervenis C.
        • Sarr M.
        • Abu Hilal M.
        • Adham M.
        • et al.
        The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula : 11 years after.
        Surgery. 2017; 161: 584-591
        • Andrews J.
        • Guyatt G.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Alderson P.
        • Dahm P.
        • Falck-Ytter Y.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66: 719-725
        • Berger A.C.
        • Howard T.J.
        • Kennedy E.P.
        • Sauter P.R.
        • Bower-Cherry M.
        • Dutkevitch S.
        • et al.
        Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208: 738-749
        • Peng S.Y.
        • Wang J.W.
        • Lau W.Y.
        • Cai X.J.
        • Mou Y.P.
        • Liu Y.B.
        • et al.
        Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 692-698
        • Oussoultzoglou E.
        • Bachellier P.
        • Bigourdan J.M.
        • Weber J.C.
        • Nakano H.
        • Jaeck D.
        Pancreaticogastrostomy decreased relaparotomy caused by pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy.
        Arch Surg. 2004; 139: 327-335
        • Marcus S.G.
        • Cohen H.
        • Ranson S.H.
        Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
        Ann Surg. 1995; 222: 635-645
        • Bassi C.
        • Falconi M.
        • Molinari E.
        • Mantovani W.
        • Butturini G.
        • Gumbs A.A.
        • et al.
        Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.
        Surgery. 2003; 134: 766-771
        • Bai X.
        • Zhang Q.
        • Gao S.
        • Lou J.
        • Li G.
        • Zhang Y.
        • et al.
        Duct-to-mucosa vs invagination for pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial from a single surgeon.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2016; 222: 10-18
        • Casadei R.
        • Ricci C.
        • Silvestri S.
        • Campra D.
        • Ercolani G.
        • D'Ambra M.
        • et al.
        Peng's binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. An Italian, prospective, dual-institution study.
        Pancreatology. 2013; 13: 305-309
        • Targarona J.
        • Barreda L.
        • Pando E.
        • Barreda C.
        Is Peng's pancreaticojejunal anastomosis more effective than mucosa-mucosa anastomosis in duodenopancreatectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary tumours?.
        Cir Esp. 2013; 91: 163-168
        • Kleespies A.
        • Rentsch M.
        • Seeliger H.
        • Albertsmeier M.
        • Jauch K.W.
        • Bruns C.J.
        Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection.
        Br J Surg. 2009; 96: 741-750
        • Strasberg S.M.
        • Drebin J.A.
        • Mokadam N.A.
        • Green D.W.
        • Jones K.L.
        • Ehlers J.P.
        • et al.
        Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 194: 746-758
        • Andrianello S.
        • Pea A.
        • Pulvirenti A.
        • Allegrini V.
        • Marchegiani G.
        • Malleo G.
        • et al.
        Pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: suture material and incidence of post-operative pancreatic fistula.
        Pancreatology. 2016; 16: 138-141
        • Jang J.Y.
        • Kim S.W.
        • Park S.J.
        • Park Y.H.
        Comparison of the functional outcome after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy.
        World J Surg. 2002; 26: 366-371
        • Shrikhande S.V.
        • Barreto G.
        • Shukla P.J.
        Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy.
        Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008; 393: 87-91
        • Delcore R.
        • Thomas J.H.
        • Pierce G.E.
        • Hermreck A.S.
        Pancreatogastrostomy: a safe drainage procedure after pancreatoduodenectomy.
        Surgery. 1990; 108: 641-645
        • Telford G.L.
        • Mason G.R.
        Pancreaticogastrostomy: clinical experience with a direct pancreatic-duct-to-gastric-mucosa anastomoses.
        Am J Surg. 1984; 147: 832-837
        • Fernández-Cruz L.
        • Cosa R.
        • Blanco L.
        • López-Boado M.A.
        • Astudillo E.
        Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy.
        Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 930-938
        • Keck T.
        • Wellner U.F.
        • Bahra M.
        • Klein F.
        • Sick O.
        • Niedergethmann M.
        • et al.
        Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
        Ann Surg. 2016; 263: 440-449
        • Eckardt A.J.
        • Klein F.
        • Adler A.
        • Veltzke-Schlieker W.
        • Warnick P.
        • Bahra M.
        • et al.
        Management and outcomes of haemorrhage after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy.
        Br J Surg. 2011; 98: 1599-1607
        • Schlitt H.J.
        • Schmidt U.
        • Simunec D.
        • Jäger M.
        • Aselmann H.
        • Neipp M.
        • et al.
        Morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy following partial pancreatoduodenectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2002; 89: 1245-1251
        • Nakamura H.
        • Murakami Y.
        • Uemura K.
        • Hayashidani Y.
        • Sudo T.
        • Ohge H.
        • et al.
        Predictive factors for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13: 1321-1327
        • Hirono S.
        • Murakami Y.
        • Tani M.
        • Kawai M.
        • Okada K.
        • Uemura K.
        • et al.
        Identification of risk factors for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreaticoduodenectomy using a 13C-labeled mixed triglyceride breath test.
        World J Surg. 2015; 39: 516-525
        • Yeo C.J.
        • Cameron J.L.
        • Maher M.M.
        • Sauter P.K.
        • Zahurak M.L.
        • Talamini M.A.
        • et al.
        A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
        Ann Surg. 1995; 222: 580-588
        • Bassi C.
        • Falconi M.
        • Molinari E.
        • Salvia R.
        • Butturini G.
        • Sartori N.
        • et al.
        Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 767-771
        • Duffas J.P.
        • Suc B.
        • Msika S.
        • Fourtanier G.
        • Muscari F.
        • Hay J.M.
        • et al.
        • French Associations for Research in Surgery
        A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
        Am J Surg. 2005; 189: 720-729
        • Wellner U.F.
        • Sick O.
        • Olschewski M.
        • Adam U.
        • Hopt U.T.
        • Keck T.
        Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16: 1686-1695
        • Topal B.
        • Fieuws S.
        • Aerts R.
        • Weerts J.
        • Feryn T.
        • Roeyen G.
        • et al.
        • Belgian Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery
        Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 655-662
        • Figueras J.
        • Sabater L.
        • Planellas P.
        • Muñoz-Forner E.
        • Lopez-Ben S.
        • Falgueras L.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2013; 100: 1597-1605
        • ElNakeeb A.
        • Hamdy E.
        • Sultan A.M.
        • Salah T.
        • Askr W.
        • Ezzat H.
        • et al.
        Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.
        HPB (Oxford). 2014; 16: 713-722
        • McKay A.
        • Mackenzie S.
        • Sutherland F.R.
        • Bathe O.F.
        • Doig C.
        • Dort J.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 929-936
        • Wente M.N.
        • Shrikhande S.V.
        • Müller M.W.
        • Diener M.K.
        • Seiler C.M.
        • Friess H.
        • et al.
        Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Surg. 2007; 193: 171-183
        • Clerveus M.
        • Morandeira-Rivas A.
        • Picazo-Yeste J.
        • Moreno-Sanz C.
        Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 18: 1693-1704
        • Hallet J.
        • Zih F.S.
        • Deobald R.G.
        • Scheer A.S.
        • Law C.H.
        • Coburn N.G.
        • et al.
        The impact of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        HPB (Oxford). 2015; 17: 113-122
        • Que W.
        • Fang H.
        • Yan B.
        • Li J.
        • Guo W.
        • Zhai W.
        • et al.
        Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        Am J Surg. 2015; 209: 1074-1082
        • Menahem B.
        • Guittet L.
        • Mulliri A.
        • Alves A.
        • Lubrano J.
        Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        Ann Surg. 2015; 261: 882-887
        • Sachs T.E.
        • Pratt W.B.
        • Kent T.S.
        • Callery M.P.
        • Vollmer Jr., C.M.
        The pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent: friend or foe?.
        Surgery. 2013; 153: 651-662
        • Poon R.T.
        • Fan S.T.
        • Lo C.M.
        • Ng K.K.
        • Yuen W.K.
        • Yeung C.
        • et al.
        External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 246: 425-435
        • Pessaux P.
        • Sauvanet A.
        • Mariette C.
        • Paye F.
        • Muscari F.
        • Cunha A.S.
        • et al.
        External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial.
        Ann Surg. 2011; 253: 879-885
        • Motoi F.
        • Egawa S.
        • Rikiyama T.
        • Katayose Y.
        • Unno M.
        Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy.
        Br J Surg. 2012; 99: 524-531
        • Winter J.M.
        • Cameron J.L.
        • Campbell K.A.
        • Chang D.C.
        • Riall T.S.
        • Schulick R.D.
        • et al.
        Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2006; 10: 1280-1290
        • Jang J.Y.
        • Chang Y.R.
        • Kim S.W.
        • Choi S.H.
        • Park S.J.
        • Lee S.E.
        • et al.
        Randomized multicentre trial comparing external and internal pancreatic stenting during pancreaticoduodenectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2016; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Dong Z.
        • Xu J.
        • Wang Z.
        • Petrov M.S.
        Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; : CD008914
        • Buchler M.
        • Friess H.
        • Klempa I.
        • Hermanek P.
        • Sulkowski U.
        • Becker H.
        • et al.
        Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complications following pancreatic resection.
        Am J Surg. 1992; 163: 125-131
        • Montorsi M.
        • Zago M.
        • Mosca F.
        • Capussotti L.
        • Zotti E.
        • Ribotta G.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resections: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial.
        Surgery. 1995; 117: 26-31
        • Yeo C.J.
        • Cameron J.L.
        • Lillemoe K.D.
        • Sauter P.K.
        • Coleman J.
        • Sohn T.A.
        • et al.
        Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial.
        Ann Surg. 2000; 232: 419-429
        • Fernández-Cruz L.
        • Jiménez Chavarría E.
        • Taurà P.
        • Closa D.
        • Boado M.A.
        • Ferrer J.
        Prospective randomized trial of the effect of octreotide on pancreatic juice output after pancreaticoduodenectomy in relation to histological diagnosis, duct size and leakage.
        HPB (Oxford). 2013; 15: 392-399
        • Sarr M.G.
        The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 196: 556-564
        • Allen P.J.
        • Gönen M.
        • Brennan M.F.
        • Bucknor A.A.
        • Robinson L.M.
        • Pappas M.M.
        • et al.
        Pasireotide for postoperative pancreatic fistula.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 2014-2022
        • Connor S.
        • Alexakis N.
        • Garden O.J.
        • Leandros E.
        • Bramis J.
        • Wigmore S.J.
        Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 1059-1067
        • Gurusamy K.S.
        • Koti R.
        • Fusai G.
        • Davidson B.R.
        Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; : CD008370
        • Klaiber U.
        • Probst P.
        • Knebel P.
        • Contin P.
        • Diener M.K.
        • Büchler M.W.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of complication rates for single-loop versus dual-loop (Roux-en-Y) with isolated pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2015; 102: 331-340
        • Adham M.
        • Chopin-Laly X.
        • Lepilliez V.
        • Gincul R.
        • Valette P.J.
        • Ponchon T.
        Pancreatic resection: drain or no drain?.
        Surgery. 2013; 154: 1069-1077
        • Shrikhande S.V.
        • Barreto S.G.
        • Shetty G.
        • Suradkar K.
        • Bodhankar Y.D.
        • Shah S.B.
        • et al.
        Postoperative abdominal drainage following major upper gastrointestinal surgery: single drain versus two drains.
        J Cancer Res Ther. 2013; 9: 267-271
        • Conlon K.C.
        • Labow D.
        • Leung D.
        • Smith A.
        • Jarnagin W.
        • Coit D.G.
        • et al.
        Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection.
        Ann Surg. 2001; 234: 487-493
        • Van Buren 2nd, G.
        • Bloomston M.
        • Hughes S.J.
        • Winter J.
        • Behrman S.W.
        • Zyromski N.J.
        • et al.
        A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage.
        Ann Surg. 2014; 259: 605-612
        • Strobel O.
        • Buchler M.W.
        Drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: controversy revitalized.
        Ann Surg. 2014; 259: 613-615
        • Pai E.
        • Shrikhande S.V.
        Drainage after pancreatico-duodenectomy: to step back may be the way forward, but are randomized controlled trials making us any wiser?.
        Ann Surg. 2016; 263: e19
        • Bassi C.
        • Molinari E.
        • Malleo G.
        • Crippa S.
        • Butturini G.
        • Salvia R.
        • et al.
        Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial.
        Ann Surg. 2010; 252: 207-214
        • McMillan M.T.
        • Malleo G.
        • Bassi C.
        • Butterini G.
        • Salvia R.
        • Roses R.
        • et al.
        Drain management following pancreatoduodenectomy: reappraisal of a prospective, randomized trial using risk stratification.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 221: 798-809
        • McMillan M.T.
        • Malleo G.
        • Bassi C.
        • Allegrini V.
        • Casetti L.
        • Drebin J.A.
        • et al.
        Multicenter, prospective trial of selective drain management for pancreatoduodenectomy using risk stratification.
        Ann Surg. 2016; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Witzigmann H.
        • Diener M.K.
        • Kißenkötter S.
        • Rossion I.
        • Bruckner T.
        • Werner B.
        • et al.
        No need for routine drainage after pancreatic head resection: the dual-center, randomized, controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707).
        Ann Surg. 2016; 264: 528-537
        • Lillemoe K.D.
        • Cameron J.L.
        • Kim M.P.
        • Campbell K.A.
        • Sauter P.K.
        • Coleman J.A.
        • et al.
        Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2004; 8: 766-772
        • Suc B.
        • Msika S.
        • Fingerhut A.
        • Fourtanier G.
        • Hay J.M.
        • Holmières F.
        • et al.
        Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial.
        Ann Surg. 2003; 237: 57-65
        • Iannitti D.A.
        • Coburn N.G.
        • Somberg J.
        • Ryder B.A.
        • Monchik J.
        • Cioffi W.G.
        Use of the round ligament of the liver to decrease pancreatic fistulas: a novel technique.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 857-864
        • Callery M.P.
        • Pratt W.B.
        • Kent T.S.
        • Chaikof E.L.
        • Vollmer C.M.
        A prospectively validated risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216: 1-14
        • Shubert C.R.
        • Wagie A.E.
        • Farnell M.B.
        • Nagorney D.M.
        • Que F.G.
        • Reid Lombardo K.M.
        • et al.
        Clinical risk score to predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: independent external validation for open and laparoscopic approaches.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 221: 689-698
        • Kunstman J.W.
        • Kuo E.
        • Fonseca A.L.
        • Salem R.R.
        Evaluation of a recently described risk classification scheme for pancreatic fistulae development after pancreaticoduodenectomy without routine post-operative drainage.
        HPB (Oxford). 2014; 16: 987-993
        • McMillan M.T.
        • Christein J.D.
        • Callery M.P.
        • Behrman S.W.
        • Drebin J.A.
        • Kent T.S.
        • et al.
        Prophylactic octreotide for pancreatoduodenectomy: more harm than good?.
        HPB (Oxford). 2014; 16: 954-962
        • McMillan M.T.
        • Allegrini V.
        • Asbun H.J.
        • Ball C.G.
        • Bassi C.
        • Beane J.D.
        • et al.
        Incorporation of procedure-specific risk into the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator improves the prediction of morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy.
        Ann Surg. 2016; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Schmidt U.
        • Simunec D.
        • Piso P.
        • Klempnauer J.
        • Schlitt H.J.
        Quality of life and functional long-term outcome after partial pancreatoduodenectomy: pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2005; 12: 467-472
        • Diener M.K.
        • Seiler C.M.
        • Rossion I.
        • Kleeff J.
        • Glanemann M.
        • Butturini G.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.
        Lancet. 2011; 377: 1514-1522
        • McMillan M.T.
        • Malleo G.
        • Bassi C.
        • Sprys M.H.
        • Vollmer C.M.
        Defining the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy around the world.
        HPB (Oxford). 2015; 17: 1145-1154
        • Croome K.P.
        • Farnell M.B.
        • Que F.G.
        • Reid-Lombardo K.M.
        • Truty M.J.
        • Nagorney D.M.
        • et al.
        Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?.
        Ann Surg. 2014; 260: 633-638
        • Wada K.
        • Traverso L.W.
        Pancreatic anastomotic leak after the Whipple procedure is reduced using the surgical microscope.
        Surgery. 2006; 139: 735-742
        • Boggi U.
        • Signori S.
        • De Lio N.
        • Perrone V.G.
        • Vistoli F.
        • Belluomini M.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2013; 100: 917-925
        • Boggi U.
        • Amorese G.
        • Vistoli F.
        • Caniglia F.
        • De Lio N.
        • Perrone V.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review.
        Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 9-23
        • Shrikhande S.V.
        • Qureshi S.S.
        • Rajneesh N.
        • Shukla P.J.
        Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: do we need further studies?.
        World J Surg. 2005; 29: 1642-1649