Advertisement

Team-based simulations for new surgeons: Does early and often make a difference?

Published:December 08, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.005

      Abstract

      Background

      Current work hour restrictions and the expansion of requirements for surgery residents has led to decreased time on high-acuity rotations such as trauma and acute care surgery. In an effort to improve resident competency, we examined the efficacy of a new team-based trauma curriculum for postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residents.

      Methods

      After completing required Advanced Trauma Life Support certification, PGY1s participated in a series of trauma simulations in 3-person teams from June to August. Scenarios were created to develop skills related to trauma management, teamwork, and communication. Each simulation was followed by video-based debriefing with a faculty facilitator. Clinical performance on a 1-month trauma rotation during the year was assessed by trauma faculty using a 24-item evaluation assessing management of acutely ill patients, leadership, communication, cooperation, and professionalism on a 1 (poor) to 5 (very effective) scale. Performance metrics of this intern class were compared with 2 years of previous cohorts who had not participated in any trauma-focused simulation curricula. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine differences in performance ratings across groups.

      Results

      The 2015 intern class (n = 30) each participated in 6 scenarios during their first 2 months in residency. Trauma as intended specialty and performance on preinternship Advanced Trauma Life Support course were similar across 2013, 2014, and 2015 cohorts. Average performance on the trauma rotation was 3.55 ± 0.56 for the 2013 cohort (n = 11), 3.50 ± 0.57 for the 2014 cohort (n = 11), and 4.35 ± 0.68 for the 2015 cohort (n = 12). Post hoc analyses indicated no difference between means of the 2013 and 2014 cohort. However, the mean of the 2015 cohort was statistically significantly better than both the 2013 cohort (P < .01) and the 2014 cohort (P < .01).

      Conclusion

      Trauma-focused simulation improved PGY1 faculty ratings of performance in the clinical setting compared with previous cohorts with no such simulation experience. Adoption of these curricula is both feasible and beneficial.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dozois E.J.
        • Holubar S.D.
        • Tsikitis V.L.
        • et al.
        Perceived impact of the 80-hour workweek: five years later.
        J Surg Res. 2009; 156: 3-15
        • Lewis F.R.
        • Klingensmith M.E.
        Issues in general surgery residency training—2012.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 256: 553-559
        • McGaghie W.C.
        • Issenberg S.B.
        • Petrusa E.R.
        • Scalese R.J.
        A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009.
        Med Educ. 2010; 44: 50-63
        • Gardner A.K.
        • Scott D.J.
        • Hebert J.C.
        • et al.
        Gearing up for the milestones: will simulation play a role?.
        Surgery. 2015; 158: 1427
        • Gardner A.K.
        • Scott D.J.
        • Pedowitz R.A.
        • et al.
        Best practices across surgical specialties relating to simulation-based training.
        Surgery. 2015; 158: 1395-1402
        • Schwab B.
        • Hungness E.
        • Barsness K.A.
        • McGaghie W.C.
        The role of simulation in surgical education.
        J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017; 27: 450-454
        • Gardner A.K.
        • Nepomnayshy D.
        • Reickert C.
        • et al.
        The value proposition of simulation.
        Surgery. 2016; 160: 546-551
        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • Chung J.W.
        • Hedges L.V.
        • et al.
        National cluster-randomized trial of duty-hour flexibility in surgical training.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 713-727
        • Farnan J.M.
        • Gaffney S.
        • Poston J.T.
        • et al.
        Patient safety room of horrors: a novel method to assess medical students and entering residents' ability to identify hazards of hospitalisation.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; 25: 153-158
        • Neylan C.J.
        • Nelson E.F.
        • Dumon K.R.
        • et al.
        Medical school surgical boot camps: a systematic review.
        J Surg Educ. 2016; 74: 384-389
        • American Board of Surgery
        • American College of Surgeons
        • Assocation of Program Directors in Surgery
        • Association for Surgical Education
        Statement on surgical preresidency preparatory courses.
        Surgery. 2014; 156: 1059-1060
        • Barone J.E.
        Problems with the fourth-year curriculum of students entering surgical residencies.
        Am J Surg. 1995; 169: 334-337
        • Barzansky B.
        • Simon F.A.
        • Brotherton S.E.
        The fourth-year medical curriculum: has anything changed in 20 years?.
        Acad Med. 2001; 76: S36-S38
        • Naylor R.A.
        • Hollett L.A.
        • Castellvi A.
        • Valentine R.J.
        • Scott D.J.
        Preparing medical students to enter surgery residencies.
        Am J Surg. 2010; 199: 105-109