Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 165, ISSUE 3, P602-607, March 2019

Download started.

Ok

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis of unplanned reoperation in patients undergoing low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

Published:October 08, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.08.016

      Abstract

      Background

      The rate of unplanned reoperation for rectal cancer can provide information about surgical quality. We sought to determine factors associated with unplanned reoperation after low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for patients with rectal cancer and outcomes after these reoperations.

      Methods

      The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to conduct this retrospective study. Patients who underwent elective low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer from 2012–2014 were identified. The primary outcomes were 30-day reoperation rates and postoperative complications.

      Results

      A total of 454 low anterior resection patients (5.9%) and 289 abdominoperineal resection patients (8.1%) required reoperation within 30 days of their index operation. The most common reasons for reoperation were infection, bleeding, and bowel obstruction. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex (odds ratio: 1.5, P = .001), poor functional status (odds ratio: 2.2, P = .04), operative time (odds ratio: 1.001, P = .01), low preoperative albumin (odds ratio: 0.79, P = .04), and lack of ostomy (odds ratio, 0.66, P = .005) were independent risk factors for reoperation after low anterior resection. Smoking (odds ratio: 1.7, P = .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio: 1.8, P = .03), poor functional status (odds ratio: 2.1, P = .032), operative time (odds ratio: 1.003, P < .001), low preoperative albumin (odds ratio: 0.69, P = .007), and open approach (odds ratio: 1.5, P = .02) were independent risk factors for reoperation after abdominoperineal resection. Postoperative complication rates are high for those undergoing reoperation, often leading to non-home discharge (P < .001) after reoperation.

      Conclusion

      Reoperation after low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer is not uncommon. This study highlights the indications for reoperation, potentially modifiable preoperative risk factors for reoperation, and the morbidity associated with such operations.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Merkow RP
        • Bilimoria KY
        • Cohen ME
        • Richards K
        • Ko CY
        • Hall BL
        Variability in reoperation rates at 182 hospitals: A potential target for quality improvement.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209: 557-564
        • Ansari MZ
        • Collopy BT
        The risk of an unplanned return to the operating room in Australian hospitals.
        Aust N Z J Surg. 1996; 66: 10-13
        • Birkmeyer JD
        • Hamby LS
        • Birkmeyer CM
        • Decker MV
        • Karon NM
        • Dow RW
        Is unplanned return to the operating room a useful quality indicator in general surgery?.
        Arch Surg. 2001; 136: 405-411
        • Isbister WH
        Unplanned return to the operating room.
        Aust N Z J Surg. 1998; 68: 143-146
        • Morris AM
        • Baldwin LM
        • Matthews B
        • Dominitz JA
        • Barlow WE
        • Dobie SA
        • et al.
        Reoperation as a quality indicator in colorectal surgery: A population-based analysis.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 73-79
        • Ploeg AJ
        • Lange CP
        • Lardenoye JW
        • Breslau PJ
        The incidence of unplanned returns to the operating room after peripheral arterial bypass surgery and its value as indicator of quality of care.
        Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008; 42: 19-24
        • Khuri SF
        • Daley J
        • Henderson W
        • Barbour G
        • Lowry P
        • Irvin G
        • et al.
        The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: Risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care.
        J Am Coll Surg. 1995; 180: 519-531
        • Leape LL
        • Brennan TA
        • Laird N
        • Lawthers AG
        • Localio AR
        • Barnes BA
        • et al.
        The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.
        N Engl J Med. 1991; 324: 377-384
        • van Westreenen HL
        • Ijpma FF
        • Wevers KP
        • Afzali H
        • Patijn GA
        Reoperation after colorectal surgery is an independent predictor of the 1-year mortality rate.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54: 1438-1442
        • Khoury W
        • Lavery IC
        • Kiran RP
        Impact of early reoperation after resection for colorectal cancer on long-term oncological outcomes.
        Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14: e117-e123
      1. ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip/participant-use.

      2. User Guide for the 2012 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip/participant-use.

        • Kirchhoff P
        • Clavien PA
        • Hahnloser D
        Complications in colorectal surgery: Risk factors and preventive strategies.
        Patient Saf Surg. 2010; 4: 5
        • Feo LJ
        • Jrebi N
        • Asgeirsson T
        • Dujovny N
        • Figg R
        • Hoedema R
        • et al.
        Anastomotic leaks: Technique and timing of detection.
        Am J Surg. 2014; 207 (discussion 374): 371-374
        • Zingmond D
        • Maggard M
        • O'Connell J
        • Liu J
        • Etzioni D
        • Ko C
        What predicts serious complications in colorectal cancer resection?.
        Am Surg. 2003; 69: 969-974
        • Mohri Y
        • Inoue Y
        • Tanaka K
        • Hiro J
        • Uchida K
        • Kusunoki M
        Prognostic nutritional index predicts postoperative outcome in colorectal cancer.
        World J Surg. 2013; 37: 2688-2692
        • Campbell Jr., DA
        • Henderson WG
        • Englesbe MJ
        • Hall BL
        • O'Reilly M
        • Bratzler D
        • et al.
        Surgical site infection prevention: the importance of operative duration and blood transfusion—Results of the first American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Best Practices Initiative.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 810-820
        • Culver DH
        • Horan TC
        • Gaynes RP
        • Martone WJ
        • Jarvis WR
        • Emori TG
        • et al.
        Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System.
        Am J Med. 1991; 91: 152S-157S
        • Haley RW
        • Culver DH
        • Morgan WM
        • White JW
        • Emori TG
        • Hooton TM
        Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection. A simple multivariate index of patient susceptibility and wound contamination.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121: 206-215
        • Kurosawa S
        • Kato M
        Anesthetics, immune cells, and immune responses.
        J Anesth. 2008; 22: 263-277
        • Michaels AD
        • Mullen MG
        • Guidry CA
        • Krebs ED
        • Turrentine FE
        • Hedrick TL
        • et al.
        Unplanned reoperation following colorectal surgery: Indications and operations.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 21: 1480-1485
        • Goltsman D
        • Munabi NC
        • Ascherman JA
        The association between smoking and plastic surgery outcomes in 40,465 patients: An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data Sets.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 503-511
        • Feldman L
        • Barkun J
        • Barkun A
        • Sampalis J
        • Rosenberg L
        Measuring postoperative complications in general surgery patients using an outcomes-based strategy: Comparison with complications presented at morbidity and mortality rounds.
        Surgery. 1997; 122 (discussion 719–20): 711-719
        • Gawande AA
        • Thomas EJ
        • Zinner MJ
        • Brennan TA
        The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992.
        Surgery. 1999; 126: 66-75
        • Li LT
        • Mills WL
        • White DL
        • Li A
        • Gutierrez AM
        • Berger DH
        • et al.
        Causes and prevalence of unplanned readmissions after colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013; 61: 1175-1181
        • Jencks SF
        • Williams MV
        • Coleman EA
        Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 1418-1428
        • Greenblatt DY
        • Weber SM
        • O'Connor ES
        • LoConte NK
        • Liou JI
        • Smith MA
        Readmission after colectomy for cancer predicts one-year mortality.
        Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 659-669