Surgical innovation as the driver of change in academic surgery

Published:February 14, 2019DOI:
      For centuries, academic departments of surgery have been charged with the management of surgical knowledge. This has been accomplished through the following: application, providing the highest quality surgical care; training, educating medical students, residents, fellows, and faculty; discovery, advancing the practice of surgery; and dissemination, improving the health of the community. To fulfill this responsibility, leaders of academic departments of surgery have leveraged a wide range of human, structural, and relational knowledge and skills—their intellectual capital.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Roach M.
        Encouraging entrepreneurship in university labs: Research activities, research outputs, and early doctorate careers.
        PloS One. 2017; 12: e0170444
        • Association of University Technology Managers
        AUTM US licensing activity survey: FY2016. Oakbrook Terrace.
        AUTM, IL2017
        • Sanberg P.R.
        • Gharib M.
        • Harker P.T.
        • et al.
        Changing the academic culture: Valuing patents and commercialization toward tenure and career advancement.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111: 6542-6547
      1. Drucker P. Peter F. Drucker Award for Nonprofit Innovation. 1991, Award Remarks.

        • Lee Y.
        'Technology transfer' and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration.
        Research Policy. 1996; 25: 843-863
        • Evans J.M.
        • Brown A.
        • Baker G.R.
        Intellectual capital in the healthcare sector: A systematic review and critique of the literature.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15: 556
        • Subramaniam M.
        • Youndt M.A.
        The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities.
        Academy of Management Journal. 2005; 48: 450-463
        • Millard E.
        U of M ebuts entrepreneurial leave program for faculty.
        (The Line Web site) (Accessed April 15, 2018)
        • Cohen M.S.
        Enhancing surgical innovation through a specialized medical school pathway of excellence in innovation and entrepreneurship: Lessons learned and opportunities for the future.
        Surgery. 2017; 162: 989-993
        • Servoss J.
        • Chang C.
        • Olson D.
        • Ward K.R.
        • Mulholland M.W.
        • Cohen M.S.
        The Surgery Innovation and Entrepreneurship Development Program (SIEDP): An Experiential Learning Program for Surgery Faculty to Ideate and Implement Innovations in Health care.
        J Surg Educ. 2018; 75: 935-941
      2. ARISE 2: Unleashing America's research & innovation enterprise. American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Cambridge, MA2013
      3. Fast Forward Medical Innovation Web site.
        (Accessed April 15, 2018)
      4. Mayo Clinic Center for Innovation Web site.
        (Accessed April 15, 2018)
      5. QB3 Web site.
        (Accessed April 15, 2018)
      6. Cedars-Sinai Accelerator Powered by Techstars Web site.
        (Accessed April 15, 2018)
      7. Dyrda L. 58 hospitals with innovation programs - 2017. Becker's Hospital Review, Becker's Healthcare, Accessed August 24, 2017.