Intestine| Volume 168, ISSUE 2, P305-312, August 2020

Routine histopathologic examination of the appendix after appendectomy for presumed appendicitis: Is it really necessary? A systematic review and meta-analysis



      Owing to substantial costs and increasing interest in the nonoperative management of appendicitis, the necessity of routine histopathologic examination of appendectomy specimens is being questioned. The aim of this study was to determine whether routine histopathologic examination after appendectomy for suspected appendicitis should still be performed.


      PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies listing the histopathologic diagnoses after appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Main outcomes were the incidence of histopathologically proven aberrant findings, the ability of surgeons to recognize unexpected appendiceal pathology intraoperatively, and the percentage of aberrant findings resulting in a change of postoperative management. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.


      Twenty-five studies with 57,357 patients were included. The pooled percentage of aberrant findings was 2.52% (95% confidence interval 1.81–3.51). Neoplasms were found in 0.71% (95% confidence interval 0.54–0.94). Findings of the intraoperative assessment by the surgeon were reported for 82 of the 2,718 (3.0%) unexpected diagnoses, with great variation between studies. The impact on postoperative management was described for 237 of 2,718 (8.7%) aberrant findings. Of these, 166 (70.0%) resulted in a change of postoperative management.


      Based on current evidence, it remains unclear how many of the unexpected appendiceal pathologies with clinical consequences can be identified intraoperatively by the surgeon. Until reliable data on the safety and potential cost savings of a selective policy becomes available, we advise sending appendectomy specimens routinely for histopathologic examination.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Ferris M.
        • Quan S.
        • Kaplan B.S.
        • et al.
        The global incidence of appendicitis: a systematic review of population-based studies.
        Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 237-241
        • Addiss D.G.
        • Shaffer N.
        • Fowler B.S.
        • Tauxe R.V.
        The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132: 910-925
        • Miller G.G.
        • McDonald S.E.
        • Milbrandt K.
        • Chibbar R.
        Routine pathological evaluation of tissue from inguinal hernias in children is unnecessary.
        Can J Surg. 2003; 46: 117-119
        • Chesley P.M.
        • Black G.E.
        • Martin M.J.
        • Johnson E.K.
        • Maykel J.A.
        • Steele S.R.
        The utility of pathologic evaluation of adult hernia specimens.
        Am J Surg. 2015; 209: 783-786
        • McKeon K.
        • Boyer M.I.
        • Goldfarb C.A.
        Use of routine histologic evaluation of carpal ganglions.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31: 284-288
        • Cho H.E.
        • Kelley B.
        • Zhong L.
        • Chung K.C.
        Use of routine pathologic evaluation of nonmalignant lesions in hand surgery: a national study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 160e-168e
        • Dewil B.
        • Jorissen M.
        • Lemkens P.
        Routine pathological evaluation after tonsillectomy: is it necessary?.
        B-ENT. 2006; 2: 103-108
        • Nelson M.E.
        • Gernon T.J.
        • Taylor J.C.
        • McHugh J.B.
        • Thorne M.C.
        Pathologic evaluation of routine pediatric tonsillectomy specimens: analysis of cost-effectiveness.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 144: 778-783
        • Swank H.A.
        • Eshuis E.J.
        • Ubbink D.T.
        • Bemelman W.A.
        Is routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens useful? A systematic review of the literature.
        Colorectal Dis. 2011; 13: 1214-1221
        • Stroup D.F.
        • Berlin J.A.
        • Morton S.C.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group.
        JAMA. 2000; 283: 2008-2012
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        • and the PRISMA Group
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: b2535
      1. Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Accessed April 1, 2019.

      2. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO classification of tumours: Digestive system tumours. 5th ed, vol. 1. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2019.

        • Carr N.J.
        • Cecil T.D.
        • Mohamed F.
        • et al.
        • and the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International
        A consensus for classification and pathologic reporting of pseudomyxoma peritonei and associated appendiceal neoplasia: the results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) modified delphi process.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2016; 40: 14-26
        • Munn Z.
        • Moola S.
        • Lisy K.
        • Riitano D.
        • Tufanaru C.
        Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.
        Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13: 147-153
        • Amr B.
        • Froghi F.
        • Edmond M.
        • Haq K.
        • Kochupapy R.T.
        Management and outcomes of appendicular neuroendocrine tumours: retrospective review with 5-year follow-up.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015; 41: 1243-1246
        • Perveen M.
        • Neelum S.
        • Rafique N.
        • Mirbahar A.M.
        Incidence of acute appendicitis on histopathology.
        Medical Forum Mon. 2017; 28: 58-61
        • Abdelaal A.
        • El Ansari W.
        • Al-Bozom I.
        • et al.
        Frequency, characteristics and outcomes of appendicular neuroendocrine tumors: a cross-sectional study from an academic tertiary care hospital.
        Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017; 21: 20-24
        • D'Souza N.
        • Marsden M.
        • Bottomley S.
        • Nagarajah N.
        • Scutt F.
        • Toh S.
        Cost-effectiveness of routine imaging of suspected appendicitis.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018; 100: 47-51
        • Al-Kurd A.
        • Mizrahi I.
        • Siam B.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of interval appendectomy in comparison with appendectomy for acute appendicitis.
        J Surg Res. 2018; 225: 90-94
        • Meyer J.
        • Balaphas A.
        • Koessler T.
        • et al.
        [Appendix tumours and their management].
        Rev Med Suisse. 2018; 14: 1225-1229
        • Zosimas D.
        • Lykoudis P.M.
        • Burke J.
        • Strano G.
        • Leung P.
        • Shatkar V.
        Postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic appendicectomies with histopathologically normal appendix.
        Ann Ital Chir. 2019; 90: 72-77
        • Bolmers M.D.M.
        • de Jonge J.
        • van Rossem C.C.
        • van Geloven A.A.W.
        • Bemelman W.A.
        • and the Snapshot Appendicitis Collaborative Study group
        Discrepancies between intraoperative and histological evaluation of the appendix in acute appendicitis.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2019; (Available from:)
        • Guraya S.Y.
        Do we still need to perform routine histological examination of appendectomy specimens?.
        J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9: PL01
        • Leon A.F.
        • Chaverra P.A.S.
        • Restrepo L.F.A.
        Usefulness of histopathologic study of appendectomy and cholecystectomy specimens.
        Iatreia. 2010; 23: 197-203
        • Akbulut S.
        • Tas M.
        • Sogutcu N.
        • et al.
        Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis and literature review.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17: 1961-1970
        • Kokila K.
        • Nataraj A.P.R.
        • Narmadha R.
        • Jayanthi B.V.
        Spectrum of appendiceal lesions in a tertiary referral centre for a period of one year.
        J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2019; 8: 1292-1297
        • Yabanoglu H.
        • Caliskan K.
        • Ozgur Aytac H.
        • et al.
        Unusual findings in appendectomy specimens of adults: retrospective analyses of 1466 patients and a review of literature.
        Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16: e12931
        • Lal D.P.C.K.A.
        • Samarasekara N.
        • Sivaganesh S.
        • De Zoysa I.
        What can histopathology say about acute appendicitis?.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 2014; 142: A233
        • Nicholas P.G.
        • Selvarajah L.
        • Ng K.C.
        • Feely K.
        • McCormack T.
        A study of histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens in Kerry General Hospital.
        Irish J Med Sci. 2015; 184: S154
        • Stassen P.N.
        • Mullan D.
        • Mohan H.
        • et al.
        Surgeon and pathologist assessment of acute appendicitis: how accurate are we?.
        Irish J Med Sci. 2015; 184: S182
        • Mannan A.A.S.R.
        • Mani M.
        • Yuan S.
        • Ko H.B.M.
        Unexpected histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: An institutional experience.
        Laboratory Investigation. 2017; 97: 186A
        • Martellucci J.
        • Fontani A.
        • Tanzini G.
        Is routine pathological examination necessary in appendectomy for acute appendicitis?.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009; 24: 1243
        • Lohsiriwat V.
        • Vongjirad A.
        • Lohsiriwat D.
        Value of routine histopathologic examination of three common surgical specimens: appendix, gallbladder, and hemorrhoid.
        World J Surg. 2009; 33: 2189-2193
        • Chamisa I.
        A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009; 91: 688-692
        • Zulfikar I.
        • Khanzada T.W.
        • Sushel C.
        • Samad A.
        Review of the pathologic diagnoses of appendectomy specimens.
        Ann King Edward Med Univ. 2009; 15: 168
        • Ma K.W.
        • Chia N.H.
        • Yeung H.W.
        • Cheung M.T.
        If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies.
        Hong Kong Med J. 2010; 16: 12-17
        • Al-Mulhim A.S.
        Unusual findings in appendicectomy specimens: local experience in al-Ahsa region of Saudi Arabia.
        J Clin Pathol Forensic Med. 2011; 2: 40-41
        • Monajemzadeh M.
        • Hagghi-Ashtiani M.T.
        • Montaser-Kouhsari L.
        • Ahmadi H.
        • Zargoosh H.
        • Kalantari M.
        Pathologic evaluation of appendectomy specimens in children: is routine histopatholgic examination indicated?.
        Iran J Pediatr. 2011; 21: 485-490
        • Khan R.A.
        • Ghani I.
        • Chana R.S.
        Routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens in children: is there any rationale?.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 2011; 27: 1313-1315
        • Chandrasegaram M.D.
        • Rothwell L.A.
        • An E.I.
        • Miller R.J.
        Pathologies of the appendix: a 10-year review of 4670 appendicectomy specimens.
        ANZ J Surg. 2012; 82: 844-847
        • Yilmaz M.
        • Akbulut S.
        • Kutluturk K.
        • et al.
        Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens from patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: 4015-4022
        • Emre A.
        • Akbulut S.
        • Bozdag Z.
        • et al.
        Routine histopathologic examination of appendectomy specimens: retrospective analysis of 1255 patients.
        Int Surg. 2013; 98: 354-362
        • Ramraje S.N.
        • Pawar V.I.
        Routine histopathologic examination of two common surgical specimens-appendix and gallbladder: is it a waste of expertise and hospital resources?.
        Indian J Surg. 2014; 76: 127-130
        • Charfi S.
        • Sellami A.
        • Affes A.
        • Yaich K.
        • Mzali R.
        • Boudawara T.S.
        Histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a study of 24,697 cases.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014; 29: 1009-1012
        • Alemayehu H.
        • Snyder C.L.
        • St Peter S.D.
        • Ostlie D.J.
        Incidence and outcomes of unexpected pathology findings after appendectomy.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2014; 49: 1390-1393
        • Omiyale A.O.
        • Adjepong S.
        Histopathological correlations of appendectomies: a clinical audit of a single center.
        Ann Transl Med. 2015; 3: 119
        • Jat M.A.
        • Al-Swailmi F.K.
        • Mehmood Y.
        • Alrowaili M.
        • Alanazi S.
        Histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens at a district hospital of Saudi Arabia.
        Pak J Med Sci. 2015; 31: 891-894
        • Buyukbese Sarsu S.
        • Ucak R.
        • Buyukbese M.A.
        • Karakus S.C.
        • Deniz H.
        Unusual histopathological findings in childhood appendectomy specimens.
        Indian J Surg. 2015; 77: 594-599
        • Limaiem F.
        • Arfa N.
        • Marsaoui L.
        • Bouraoui S.
        • Lahmar A.
        • Mzabi S.
        Unexpected histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a retrospective study of 1627 cases.
        Indian J Surg. 2015; 77: 1285-1290
        • Jahan B.
        • Najeeb S.
        • Shaikh A.W.
        Acute appendicitis, correlating histopathological findings with clinical-is histopathology needed for all?.
        Pak J Med Health Sci. 2016; 10: 118-121
        • Dincel O.
        • Goksu M.
        • Turk B.A.
        • Pehlivanoglu B.
        • Isler S.
        Unexpected findings in the routine histopathological examinations of appendectomy specimens a retrospective analysis of 1,970 patients.
        Ann Ital Chir. 2017; 88: 519-525
        • Gorter R.R.
        • van Amstel P.
        • van der Lee J.H.
        • van der Voorn P.
        • Bakx R.
        • Heij H.A.
        Unexpected findings after surgery for suspected appendicitis rarely change treatment in pediatric patients; results from a cohort study.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2017; 52: 1269-1272
        • Baisakh P.
        • Baisakh M.R.
        • Chinara P.K.
        • Sahu M.C.
        Surveillance of appendicectomy specimen with histomorphological evaluation.
        Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2018; 11: 117-119
        • Jolayemi O.O.
        • Moodley N.B.
        • Kong V.Y.
        • Tlou B.
        • Bruce J.L.
        • Clarke D.L.
        The usefulness of routine histological examination of appendicectomy specimens in a South African tertiary centre.
        S Afr Med J. 2018; 108: 342-346
        • Singh R.
        • Bhattacharyya H.K.
        Routine histopathological examination of two common surgical specimens-appendix and gall bladder, its usefulness and impact on patient management.
        J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2018; 7: 3687-3692
        • Unver N.
        • Coban G.
        • Arici D.S.
        • et al.
        Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis of 2047 cases.
        Int J Surg Pathol. 2019; 27: 142-146
        • Bronner M.P.
        Granulomatous appendicitis and the appendix in idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease.
        Semin Diagn Pathol. 2004; 21: 98-107
        • Pape U.F.
        • Niederle B.
        • Costa F.
        • et al.
        and the Vienna Consensus Conference Participants. ENETS consensus guidelines for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the appendix (excluding goblet cell carcinomas).
        Neuroendocrinology. 2016; 103: 144-152
        • Shaib W.L.
        • Assi R.
        • Shamseddine A.
        • et al.
        Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: diagnosis and management.
        Oncologist. 2017; 22: 1107-1116
        • van Rossem C.C.
        • Bolmers M.D.
        • Schreinemacher M.H.
        • van Geloven A.A.
        • Bemelman W.A.
        • and the Snapshot Appendicitis Collaborative Study Group
        Prospective nationwide outcome audit of surgery for suspected acute appendicitis.
        Br J Surg. 2016; 103: 144-151
        • Bastiaenen V.P.
        • Corten B.J.
        • de Savornin Lohman E.A.
        • et al.
        Safety and cost analysis of selective histopathological examination following appendicectomy and cholecystectomy (FANCY study): protocol and statistical analysis plan of a prospective observational multicentre study.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e035912