Advertisement
Education Presented at the Academic Surgical Congress 2020| Volume 168, ISSUE 4, P730-736, October 2020

What embodies an effective surgical educator? A grounded theory analysis of resident opinion

      Abstract

      Background

      Effective surgical education is key to resident professional and personal development. There is little literature defining or assessing effective surgical educators and no common definition of effectiveness in use. The opinion of surgical residents has never been qualitatively studied. Our aim was to determine what general surgery residents perceive as qualities of effective surgical educators.

      Methods

      A qualitative and quantitative study of general surgery senior residents (postgraduate year [PGY]–4 and –5) at a single tertiary academic institution was performed. In-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with all senior residents to determine the overall opinion of effective educators. Thematic analysis was performed using grounded theory. Participants completed a Likert-based survey to determine which qualities of an effective educator were (1) most critical and (2) had been most commonly encountered during training. Institutional review board approval was obtained.

      Results

      Data saturation occurred after 13 interviews (7 PGY-4, 6 PGY-5). Interviewees described attitudes, behaviors, and cognitions essential for effective surgical educators. They described important attributes of the trainee–trainer relationship and learning environment. On quantitative analysis, excellent communication, promoting a positive learning climate, timely constructive feedback, and technical expertise were ranked as most critical. Residents most often encountered educators with excellent communication, who fostered a positive learning climate, with clinical and technical expertise, and who provided leadership or mentorship.

      Conclusion

      General surgery residents believe effective educators recognize the importance of communication and a positive learning environment, are able to adapt to the learner or environment, have clinical and technical expertise, and form a bond with their learner. This framework can inform faculty development programs to improve surgical education.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Boerebach B.C.
        • Arah O.A.
        • Busch O.R.
        • et al.
        Reliable and valid tools for measuring surgeons’ teaching performance: residents’ vs. self-evaluation.
        J Surg Educ. 2012; 69: 511-520
        • Boerebach B.C.
        • Arah O.A.
        • Heineman M.J.
        • et al.
        The impact of resident- and self-evaluations on surgeon’s subsequent teaching performance.
        World J Surg. 2014; 38: 2761-2769
        • Dickinson K.J.
        • Bass B.L.
        • Pei K.Y.
        The current evidence for defining and assessing effectiveness of surgical educators: a systematic review.
        World J Surg. 2020; 44: 3214-3223
        • Jeffree R.L.
        • Clarke R.M.
        Ten tips for teaching in the theatre tearoom: shifting the focus from teaching to learning.
        World J Surg. 2010; 34: 2518-2523
        • Pernar L.I.
        • Ashley S.W.
        • Smink D.S.
        • et al.
        Master surgeons’ operative teaching philosophies: a qualitative analysis of parallels to learning theory.
        J Surg Educ. 2012; 69: 493-498
        • Sutton P.A.
        • Beamish A.J.
        • Rashid S.
        • et al.
        Attributes of excellent surgical trainers: an analysis of outstanding trainers.
        Int J Surg. 2018; 52: 371-375
        • Swendiman R.A.
        • Hoffman D.I.
        • Bruce A.N.
        • et al.
        Qualities and methods of highly effective surgical educators: a grounded theory model.
        J Surg Educ. 2019; 76: 1293-1302
        • Knowles M.S.
        Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning.
        Jossey-Bass, San Francisco1984
        • Kaufman D.M.
        Applying educational theory in practice.
        BMJ. 2003; 326: 213-216
        • Mayer R.E.
        Multimedia Learning.
        2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, New York2009
        • Mayer R.E.
        Learning and Instruction.
        2nd ed. Merrill Prentice Hall Pearson, Upper Saddle River (NJ)2008
        • Mayer R.E.
        Applying the science of learning to medical education.
        Med Educ. 2010; 44: 543-549
        • Mayer R.E.
        Applying the Science of Learning.
        Pearson, Boston2011
        • United States Census Bureau
        “Race”.
        United States Census Bureau. 2020;