Published:February 16, 2021DOI:
      As Editors-in-Chief, we have worked closely with our Editors and Editorial Board to define our vision, mission, and values. In addition, we have initiated multiple new innovative features that will provide keen insights to the surgical literature. Moreover, this content—consistent with our vision, mission, and values—will provide areas of emphasis for our authors and readers. We will highlight and amplify the hard work of our authors and offer extra opportunities to our readers to benefit from our published articles.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Linked Article

      • Addressing novelty in manuscripts is not so easy
        SurgeryVol. 171Issue 4
        • Preview
          I read with great interest the recent article by the co-editors-in-chief of Surgery entitled ‘‘What’s new? Addressing novelty in manuscripts.”1 As an author and reviewer of Surgery, the article inspires me. Therefore, I would like to express my thoughts on this topic, which are as follows.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF