Advertisement

Instructional methods of attendings as exhibited during intraoperative takeovers: A pilot study

Published:March 26, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.022

      Abstract

      Background

      This pilot study examined intraoperative instructional techniques during “takeovers,” defined as the act of an attending taking control of a case from a resident. This work describes what happens during takeovers and identifies possible reasons for takeovers.

      Methods

      Intraoperative audio-video recordings during 25 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair procedures were collected. Participants included 2 postgraduate year–5 residents and 5 attendings. Postoperative evaluation forms were completed by attendings. Coding schemes for takeovers during hernia reduction and mesh placement steps were developed using conventional and directed content analysis in an iterative process by study team members, including individuals with expertise in education, surgery, and surgical education.

      Results

      Takeovers occurred in 72% of cases. Frequency of takeovers was not related to case difficulty or differences in resident technical skill levels, nor did they decrease over the duration of the 2-month rotation. Takeovers most commonly occurred when a resident struggled to progress the case. They also occurred when anatomy was unclear or when the attending wanted to teach a specific skill. Differences were identified among attendings regarding frequency of takeovers. The majority of takeover behaviors were directed at instructing residents; however, attendings’ teaching techniques did not vary by resident.

      Conclusion

      Attending teaching habits appear to be independent of resident skills and depend on the attending’s teaching style rather than residents’ learning needs. Findings highlight the need for faculty development to help surgical educators learn how to tailor instruction to individual trainees. Additionally, future research is needed to establish the effectiveness of instruction through takeovers in the operating room.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Yeo H.
        • Viola K.
        • Berg D.
        • et al.
        Attitudes, training experiences, and professional expectations of US general surgery residents.
        JAMA. 2009; 302: 1301-1308
        • George B.C.
        • Bohnen J.D.
        • Williams R.G.
        • et al.
        and the Procedural Learning and Safety Collaborative (PLSC). Readiness of US general surgery residents for independent practice.
        Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 582-594
        • Napolitano L.M.
        • Savarise M.
        • Paramo J.C.
        • et al.
        Are general surgery residents ready to practice? A survey of the American College of Surgeons Board of Governors and Young Fellows Association.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 1063-1072
        • Borman K.R.
        • Vick L.R.
        • Biester T.W.
        • Mitchell M.E.
        Changing demographics of residents choosing fellowships: Longterm data from the American Board of Surgery.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206 (discussion 788–789): 782-788
        • Brewer Z.E.
        • Fann H.C.
        • Ogden W.D.
        • Burdon T.A.
        • Sheikh A.Y.
        Inheriting the learner’s view: A Google Glass-based wearable computing platform for improving surgical trainee performance.
        J Surg Educ. 2016; 73: 682-688
        • Hu Y.Y.
        • Mazer L.M.
        • Yule S.J.
        • et al.
        Complementing operating room teaching with video-based coaching.
        JAMA Surg. 2017; 152: 318-325
        • Dickinson K.J.
        • Bass B.L.
        • Pei K.Y.
        The current evidence for defining and assessing effectiveness of surgical educators: A systematic review.
        World J Surg. 2020; 44: 3214-3223
        • Landmann A.
        • Havron W.S.
        • Patel A.
        • Thompson B.M.
        • Lees J.S.
        Medical student expectations from surgical education: A two-year institutional experience.
        Am J Surg. 2016; 212: 1265-1269
        • Nelson B.
        • Na Eun K.
        • Sullivan B.
        • et al.
        Playing the surgical technologist role by surgery residents improves their technical and nontechnical skills.
        J Surg Res. 2019; 238: 57-63
        • O’Holleran B.
        • Barlow J.
        • Ford C.
        • Cochran A.
        Questions posed by residents in the operating room: A thematic analysis.
        J Surg Educ. 2019; 76: 315-320
        • O’Neill R.
        • Shapiro M.
        • Merchant A.
        The role of the operating room in medical student education: Differing perspectives of learners and educators.
        J Surg Educ. 2018; 75: 14-28
        • Blom E.M.
        • Verdaasdonk E.G.G.
        • Stassen L.P.S.
        • Stassen H.G.
        • Wieringa P.A.
        • Dankelman J.
        Analysis of verbal communication during teaching in the operating room and the potentials for surgical training.
        Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 1560-1566
        • Chen X.P.
        • Williams R.G.
        • Sanfey H.A.
        • Smink D.S.
        A taxonomy of surgeons’ guiding behaviors in the operating room.
        Am J Surg. 2015; 209: 15-20
        • Sutkin G.
        • Littleton E.B.
        • Kanter S.L.
        How surgical mentors teach: A classification of in vivo teaching behaviors part 1: Verbal teaching guidance.
        J Surg Educ. 2015; 72: 243-250
        • Sutkin G.
        • Littleton E.B.
        • Kanter S.L.
        How surgical mentors teach: A classification of in vivo teaching behaviors part 2: Physical teaching guidance.
        J Surg Educ. 2015; 72: 251-257
        • Timberlake M.D.
        • Mayo H.G.
        • Scott L.
        • Weis J.
        • Gardner A.K.
        What do we know about intraoperative teaching? A systematic review.
        Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 251-259
        • Khan N.
        • Khan M.S.
        • Dasgupta P.
        • Ahmed K.
        The surgeon as educator: fundamentals of faculty training in surgical specialties.
        BJU Int. 2013; 111: 171-178
        • Puntambekar S.
        • Hubscher R.
        Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed?.
        Educ Psychol. 2005; 40: 1-12
        • Van de Pol J.
        • Volman M.
        • Beishuizen J.
        Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research.
        Educ Psychol Rev. 2010; 22: 271-296
        • The Surgical Council on Resident Education Inc (SCORE)
        SCORE 2020-2021 curriculum outline for general surgery; 2020.
        • Larson J.L.
        • Williams R.G.
        • Ketchum J.
        • Boehler M.L.
        • Dunnington G.L.
        Feasibility, reliability and validity of an operative performance rating system for evaluating surgery residents.
        Surgery. 2005; 138 (discussion 647–649): 640-647
        • Hsieh H.F.
        • Shannon S.E.
        Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
        Qual Health Res. 2005; 15: 1277-1288
        • Hauge L.S.
        • Wanzek J.A.
        • Godellas C.
        The reliability of an instrument for identifying and quantifying surgeons’ teaching in the operating room.
        Am J Surg. 2001; 181: 333-337
        • Reiser B.
        • Tabak I.
        Scaffolding.
        in: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, New York2014: 44-62
        • Dawn S.
        • Dominguez K.D.
        • Troutman W.G.
        • Bond R.
        • Cone C.
        Instructional scaffolding to improve students’ skills in evaluating clinical literature.
        Am J Pharm Educ. 2011; 75: 62
        • Planas L.G.
        • Er N.L.
        A systems approach to scaffold communication skills development.
        Am J Pharm Educ. 2008; 72: 35
        • Bliss J.
        • Askew M.
        • Macrae S.
        Effective teaching and learning: Scaffolding revisited.
        Oxford Rev Educ. 1996; 22: 37-61
        • Mattar S.G.
        • Alseidi A.A.
        • Jones D.B.
        • et al.
        General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors.
        Ann Surg. 2013; 258: 440-449
        • Kovacs G.
        Procedural skills in medicine: Linking theory to practice.
        J Emerg Med. 1997; 15: 387-391
        • McCambridge J.
        • Witton J.
        • Elbourne D.R.
        Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67: 267-277