Advertisement

Crisis recovery in surgery: Error management and problem solving in safety-critical situations

Published:April 22, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.007

      Abstract

      Background

      Surgical crises, both clinical and executive, carry risk of harm to patients, staff, and organizations. Once stabilized and contained, crisis recovery requires complex decision-making and problem-solving to address primary failures (errors) and their consequences. In contrast to other safety-critical professions, surgeons may lack access to crisis recovery strategies and tools that go beyond the technical aspects of clinical practice. This study aims to develop a framework for surgical crisis recovery based on problem-solving interventions used by pilots in commercial aviation.

      Methods

      This study undertook observational fieldwork, semistructured interviews, and focus groups with senior airline pilots and health care safety experts. Thematic analysis using the framework method identified key interventions applicable to surgical crisis recovery. Subsequently, expert group consensus adapted and content validated this model for clinical use.

      Results

      Qualitative data from 22 aviation and health care safety experts informed surgical crisis resolution. This consisted of 3 strategies: (1) building cognitive capacity by improving situational awareness and workload management; (2) using checklists in abnormal situations to implement emergency operating procedures; (3) undertaking structured decision-making using analysis-based problem-solving cycles (eg, T-DODAR framework). Twelve tools were validated and adapted to aid implementation of these strategies.

      Conclusion

      Once stabilized, surgical crises may be resolved using 3 sequential strategies derived from commercial aviation.

      Graphical abstract

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gogalniceanu P.
        • Karydis N.
        • Loukopoulos I.
        • Kessaris N.
        • Sevdalis N.
        • Mamode N.
        Avoid, trap, and mitigate: development of an evidence-based crisis management framework in surgery.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2021; 233: 526-536
        • Gogalniceanu P.
        • Kessaris N.
        • Karydis N.
        • Loukopoulos I.
        • Sevdalis N.
        • Mamode N.
        Crisis containment: tools for harm mitigation in surgery.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2021; 233: 698-708
        • Gogalniceanu P.
        • Calder F.
        • Callaghan C.
        • Sevdalis N.
        • Mamode N.
        Surgeons are not pilots: is the aviation safety paradigm relevant to modern surgical practice?.
        J Surg Educ. 2021; 78: 1393-1399
        • Kapur N.
        • Parand A.
        • Soukup T.
        • Reader T.
        • Sevdalis N.
        Aviation and healthcare: a comparative review with implications for patient safety.
        JRSM Open. 2016; 72054270415616548
        • Eidt J.F.
        The aviation model of vascular surgery education.
        J Vasc Surg. 2012; 55: 1801-1809
        • Bryman A.
        Social Research Methods.
        5th ed. Oxford Univeristy Press, 2015
        • Ritchie J.
        • Lewis J.
        • McNaughton Nicholls C.
        • Ormston R.
        Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers.
        2nd edition. Sage, Los Angeles, CA2014
        • Kvale S.
        Doing Interviews: Qualitative Research Kit.
        Sage Publications, London2007
        • Creswell J.
        • Poth C.
        Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches.
        Sage Publications, Inc, 2017
        • Bryman A.
        • Burgess R.G.
        Qualitative Research.
        Sage, London1999
        • Gale N.K.
        • Heath G.
        • Cameron E.
        • Rashid S.
        • Redwood S.
        Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13: 117
        • Maxwell A.E.
        Analysing Qualitative Data.
        Science Paperbacks, London1975
        • Boyatzis R.
        Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development.
        Sage Publications, Inc, 1998
        • Hohmann E.
        • Cote M.P.
        • Brand J.C.
        Research pearls: expert consensus based evidence using the Delphi method.
        Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 3278-3282
        • Bryman A.
        • Burgess R.G.
        Analyzing Qualitative Data.
        Routledge, London1994
        • Peek L.
        • Fothergill A.
        Using focus groups: lessons from studying daycare centers, 9/11, and Hurricane Katrina.
        Qual Res. 2009; 9: 31-59
        • Richards L.
        Using NVivo in Qualitative Research.
        Sage, London1999
        • Tong A.
        • Sainsbury P.
        • Craig J.
        Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 349-357
      1. Gogalniceanu P. High performance in healthcare: optimising systems, cultures and interventions in surgery [Dissertation]. King’s College Library: Department of Abdominal Transplantation. Guy’s Hospital, London, King’s College London; 2019.

        • Flin R.H.
        • Mitchell L.
        Safer Surgery: Analysing Behaviour in the Operating Theatre.
        Ashgate, Burlington, VT2009
        • Apfelbaum J.L.
        • Cutter T.W.
        The four Ps: place, procedure, personnel, and patient.
        Anesthesiol Clin. 2014; 32: xvii-xxi
        • Stiegler M.P.
        • Ruskin K.J.
        Decision-making and safety in anesthesiology.
        Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012; 25: 724-729
        • Madani A.
        • Vassiliou M.C.
        • Watanabe Y.
        • et al.
        What are the principles that guide behaviors in the operating room? Creating a framework to define and measure performance.
        Ann Surg. 2017; 265: 255-267
        • Madani A.
        • Watanabe Y.
        • Bilgic E.
        • et al.
        Measuring intra-operative decision-making during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: validity evidence for a novel interactive Web-based assessment tool.
        Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 1203-1212
        • Helmreich R.L.
        On error management: lessons from aviation.
        BMJ. 2000; 320: 781-785
        • Madani A.
        • Watanabe Y.
        • Feldman L.S.
        • et al.
        Expert intraoperative judgment and decision-making: defining the cognitive competencies for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 221: 931-940 e938
        • Fallucco S.J.
        Aircraft command techniques : gaining leadership skills to fly the left seat.
        Ashgate, Burlington, VT2002
        • Dabekaussen K.
        • Scheepers R.A.
        • Heineman E.
        • Lombarts K.
        The Surgical Hazardous Attitudes Reflection Profile (SHARP) instrument: a prototype study.
        J Surg Educ. 2020; 77: 422-437
        • Bruinsma W.E.
        • Becker S.J.
        • Guitton T.G.
        • Kadzielski J.
        • Ring D.
        How prevalent are hazardous attitudes among orthopaedic surgeons?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473: 1582-1589
        • Russ S.
        • Hull L.
        • Rout S.
        • Vincent C.
        • Darzi A.
        • Sevdalis N.
        Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: feasibility of clinical and nonclinical assessor calibration with short-term training.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 804-809
      2. Klinect JR, Merrit PMA, Helmreich R. Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA): Definition and operating characteristics. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 663–668). Dayton, OH: The Ohio State University; 2003.

        • Endsley M.R.
        Toward a theory of situational awareness in dynamic systems.
        Human Factors. 1995; 37: 85-104
        • Arora S.
        • Sevdalis N.
        • Nestel D.
        • Woloshynowych M.
        • Darzi A.
        • Kneebone R.
        The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature.
        Surgery. 2010; 147 (e311–316): 318-330
        • Jung J.J.
        • Juni P.
        • Lebovic G.
        • Grantcharov T.
        First-year analysis of the operating room black box study.
        Ann Surg. 2020; 271: 122-127
        • Brennan P.A.
        • Holden C.
        • Shaw G.
        • Morris S.
        • Oeppen R.S.
        Leading article: what can we do to improve individual and team situational awareness to benefit patient safety?.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;
        • Sexton J.B.
        • Thomas E.J.
        • Helmreich R.L.
        Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys.
        BMJ. 2000; 320: 745-749
        • Brennan P.A.
        • Mitchell D.A.
        • Holmes S.
        • Plint S.
        • Parry D.
        Good people who try their best can have problems: recognition of human factors and how to minimise error.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 54: 3-7
        • Shanafelt T.D.
        • Balch C.M.
        • Bechamps G.
        • et al.
        Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons.
        Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 995-1000
        • The A.F.
        • Reijmerink I.
        • van der Laan M.
        • Cnossen F.
        Heart rate variability as a measure of mental stress in surgery: a systematic review.
        Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020; 93: 805-821
        • Phitayakorn R.
        • Minehart R.D.
        • Hemingway M.W.
        • Pian-Smith M.C.
        • Petrusa E.
        Relationship between physiologic and psychological measures of autonomic activation in operating room teams during a simulated airway emergency.
        Am J Surg. 2015; 209: 86-92
        • Pattni N.
        • Arzola C.
        • Malavade A.
        • Varmani S.
        • Krimus L.
        • Friedman Z.
        Challenging authority and speaking up in the operating room environment: a narrative synthesis.
        Br J Anaesth. 2019; 122: 233-244
        • Arriaga A.F.
        • Bader A.M.
        • Wong J.M.
        • et al.
        Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 246-253
        • Ziewacz J.E.
        • Arriaga A.F.
        • Bader A.M.
        • et al.
        Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 213: 212-217 e210
        • Lamb B.
        • Green J.S.
        • Vincent C.
        • Sevdalis N.
        Decision making in surgical oncology.
        Surg Oncol. 2011; 20: 163-168
        • Soll H.
        • Proske S.
        • Hofinger G.
        • Steinhardt G.
        Decision-making tools for aeronautical teams: FOR-DEC and beyond.
        Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors. 2016; 6: 101-112
        • Flight Safety Foundation
        Pilot memory aids.
        • Davies J.M.
        • Delaney G.
        Can the aviation industry be useful in teaching oncology about safety?.
        Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017; 29: 669-675
        • Hughes K.M.
        • Benenson R.S.
        • Krichten A.E.
        • Clancy K.D.
        • Ryan J.P.
        • Hammond C.
        A crew resource management program tailored to trauma resuscitation improves team behavior and communication.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 219: 545-551
        • Moriarty D.
        Practical Human Factors for Pilots.
        Elsevier, 2015