Advertisement

Twenty-two–year evolution of a Medical Breast Service: Filling the important gaps between breast surgery and medical oncology

      Abstract

      Background

      Historically, surgeons have provided subspecialty breast care. The development of a robust medical breast program in a large academic center staffed by trained primary care providers initially showed a shift in care of benign breast disease away from surgeons. In this review, we aim to revisit the practice after 20 years. Medical patients are defined as patients with symptomatic issues (eg, pain or lump), those at increased risk (due to family history, genetic mutations, or benign atypical lesions), or survivors in need of long-term care.

      Methods

      Data for this review were collected retrospectively from an internal outpatient appointment dataset. The sample included data for 3 staff breast surgeons (2.6 clinical full-time employees [FTEs]), 3 staff medical breast physicians (2.4 clinical FTEs), and 2 medical breast advanced practice providers (2.0 clinical FTEs). Provider visit types were grouped into 1 of 4 categories (new medical, established medical, new surgical, and established surgical) in order to review the percentages of outpatient visits by provider group.

      Results

      Before the institution of the Medical Breast Service, 75% of breast surgeons’ outpatient visits were for either new or established medical issues. Our most recent analyses show that between 2013 and 2017 breast surgeons averaged 19% of surgical outpatient visits for medical issues. Higher surgical outpatient visits have resulted in higher surgical volume, increased surgical productivity and time spent in the operating room, and decreased time to treatment at our institution. Both surgical and medical breast providers can be added and become rapidly productive with focus on their respective areas of expertise.

      Conclusion

      The Medical Breast Service has met its expectations in providing access for symptomatic patients, personalized care for those at risk, and attentive care to long-term survivors. The program has allowed for surgeons to focus on surgical outpatient visits, driving surgical volume and productivity, and streamlining care.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Smedira H.J.
        • Patrick R.J.
        • Rybicki L.A.
        • Crowe J.P.
        Integrating medical breast specialists into the traditional breast center practice model: a review of 11 years of experience.
        Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 2042-2045
        • Hassell K.
        • Cheung K.L.
        Breast nurse practitioner training and assessment: a proposed model.
        Br J Nurs. 2012; 21 (S14, S16–17): S11-S12
        • Valente S.
        • Al-Hilli Z.
        • Liu Y.
        • Greve N.
        • Tu C.
        • Grobmyer S.R.
        Association of patient factors with time to treatment for breast cancer.
        Breast J. 2020; 26: 1995-2001
        • Battaglia T.A.
        • Howard M.B.
        • Kavanah M.
        • et al.
        The addition of internists to a breast health program.
        Breast J. 2012; 18: 58-64
        • Friese C.R.
        • Hawley S.T.
        • Griggs J.J.
        • et al.
        Employment of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in breast cancer care.
        J Oncol Pract. 2010; 6: 312-316
        • Osborn G.D.
        • Jones M.
        • Gower-Thomas K.
        • Vaughan-Williams E.
        Breast disease diagnostic ability of nurse practitioners and surgeons.
        J Adv Nurs. 2010; 66: 1452-1458
        • Blackmore C.C.
        • Edwards J.W.
        • Searles C.
        • Wechter D.
        • Mecklenburg R.
        • Kaplan G.S.
        Nurse practitioner-staffed clinic at Virginia Mason improves care and lowers costs for women with benign breast conditions.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32: 20-26
        • Sabatino S.A.
        • McCarthy E.P.
        • Phillips R.S.
        • Burns R.B.
        Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers.
        Cancer Detect Prev. 2007; 31: 375-383
        • Phillips K.A.
        • Steel E.J.
        • Collins I.
        • Emery J.
        • Pirotta M.
        • Mann G.B.
        • et al.
        Transitioning to routine breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: what can we learn from cardiovascular disease?.
        Aust J Prim Health. 2016; 22: 255-261
        • Pederson H.J.
        • Hussain N.
        • Noss R.
        • et al.
        Impact of an embedded genetic counselor on breast cancer treatment.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018; 169: 43-46
        • Chlebowski R.T.
        Improving breast cancer risk assessment versus implementing breast cancer prevention.
        J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 702-704
        • Bendorf D.C.
        • Helmer S.D.
        • Osland J.S.
        • Tenofsky P.L.
        Income, productivity, and satisfaction of breast surgeons.
        Am J Surg. 2010; 199: 405-409
        • Collins I.M.
        • Bickerstaffe A.
        • Ranaweera T.
        • et al.
        iPrevent(R): a tailored, web-based, decision support tool for breast cancer risk assessment and management.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 156: 171-182