Advertisement

NIH Funding Across Surgical Specialties; How Do Women Fare?

      Abstract

      Background

      Much has been written about the under-representation of women in academic medicine. However, no study has comprehensively described the gender-based trends of National Institutes of Health funding across surgical specialties; this study provides such an overview.

      Methods

      We queried a previously created database to identify both male and female National Institutes of Health-funded surgeons. Surgical specialties and subspecialties were determined based upon formal training. Total grant costs and average costs per R01 and K grant were calculated and compared. Bivariate χ2 analyses were performed using population totals.

      Results

      In 2020, the specialties with the highest proportion of National Institutes of Health-funded female surgeon-scientists were obstetrics and gynecology (57%) and vascular surgery (40%). The general surgery subspecialties with the highest proportion of women were breast (85%), endocrine (58%), and colorectal surgery (40%). An analysis of total grant costs in 2020 revealed that in most specialties, the proportion of funding held by women was substantially less than the proportion of women investigators. In obstetrics and gynecology, women comprised 57% of surgeons, but held only 46% of the funding. Similarly, in breast surgery, women comprised 85% of surgeons, but held only 45% of the funding. Women and men had similar changes in the average total cost per R01 and K grant awarded from 2010 to 2020. In 2020, women were awarded less than men per R01 grant in general, otolaryngology, plastic and reconstructive, urology, and vascular surgery.

      Conclusion

      Although female surgeon-scientists have made significant advances in some surgical specialties, they continue to lag in others. An in-depth analysis of the factors contributing to these trends is necessary to achieve gender parity across all academic surgical specialties.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wirtzfeld D.A.
        The history of women in surgery.
        Can J Surg. 2009; 52: 317-320
        • Krebs E.D.
        • Narahari A.K.
        • Cook-Armstrong I.O.
        • et al.
        The changing face of academic surgery: overrepresentation of women among surgeon-scientists with R01 funding.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2020; 231: 427-433
        • Linscheid L.J.
        • Holliday E.B.
        • Ahmed A.
        • et al.
        Women in academic surgery over the last four decades.
        PloS One. 2020; 15e0243308
        • Lopez S.A.
        • Svider P.F.
        • Misra P.
        • Bhagat N.
        • Langer P.D.
        • Eloy J.A.
        Gender differences in promotion and scholarly impact: an analysis of 1460 academic ophthalmologists.
        J Surg Educ. 2014; 71: 851-859
        • Silva N.A.
        • Cerasiello S.Y.
        • Herendeen J.S.
        • et al.
        Gender differences in NIH grant funding in neurological surgery.
        J Clin Neurosci. 2020; 80: 43-49
        • Eloy J.A.
        • Svider P.F.
        • Kovalerchik O.
        • Baredes S.
        • Kalyoussef E.
        • Chandrasekhar S.S.
        Gender differences in successful NIH grant funding in otolaryngology.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 149: 77-83
        • Svider P.F.
        • D'Aguillo C.M.
        • White P.E.
        • et al.
        Gender differences in successful National Institutes of Health funding in ophthalmology.
        J Surg Educ. 2014; 71: 680-688
        • Demblowski L.A.
        • Busse B.
        • Santangelo G.
        • et al.
        NIH Funding for surgeon-scientists in the US: what is the current status?.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2021; 232: 265-274.e2
        • NIH
        iSearch.
        • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
        CPI inflation calculator.
        • Silvestre J.
        • Ahn J.
        • Levin L.S.
        National Institutes of Health Funding to Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery at U.S. Medical Schools.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99: e5
        • Silvestre J.
        • Abbatematteo J.M.
        • Chang B.
        • Serletti J.M.
        Trends and predictors of National Institutes of Health funding to plastic surgery residency programs.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 1301-1311
        • Gallagher K.
        • Davis F.M.
        • Kibbe M.
        • Brewster L.
        • Tzeng E.
        • Society for Vascular Surgery Research Council
        A 22-year analysis of the Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation Mentored Research Career Development Award in fostering vascular surgeon-scientists.
        J Vasc Surg. 2022; 75: 398-406.e3
        • Mesquita-Neto J.W.
        • Manoharan J.
        • Dailey W.
        • Macedo F.I.
        • Merchant N.B.
        National Institutes of Health research funding to academic surgical oncologists: who are we and where do we stand?.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 28: 4195-4202
      1. Silvestre J, Abbatematteo JM, Serletti JM, Chang B. National Institutes of Health funding in plastic surgery: a crisis? 2016;138:732–739.

        • Okeigwe I.
        • Wang C.
        • Politch J.A.
        • Heffner L.J.
        • Kuohung W.
        Physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology: predictors of success in obtaining independent research funding.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217: 84.e1-84.e8
        • Berg E.J.
        • Ashurst J.
        National Institutes of Health Funding in obstetrics and gynecology: analysis of R01 grants by degree and gender.
        Cureus. 2020; 12e8170
        • Donington J.S.
        • Litle V.R.
        • Sesti J.
        • Colson Y.L.
        The WTS report on the current status of women in cardiothoracic surgery.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 94 (discussion 458–459): 452-458
        • Narahari A.K.
        • Cook I.O.
        • Mehaffey J.H.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive National Institutes of Health funding analysis of academic cardiac surgeons.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 159: 2326-2335.e3
        • Seemann N.M.
        • Webster F.
        • Holden H.A.
        • et al.
        Women in academic surgery: why is the playing field still not level?.
        Am J Surg. 2016; 211: 343-349
        • Cochran A.
        • Neumayer L.A.
        • Elder W.B.
        Barriers to careers identified by women in academic surgery: a grounded theory model.
        Am J Surg. 2019; 218: 780-785
        • Berry C.
        • Khabele D.
        • Johnson-Mann C.
        • et al.
        A Call to action: Black/African American women surgeon scientists, where are they?.
        Ann Surg. 2020; 272: 24-29
        • Lewit R.A.
        • Black C.M.
        • Camp L.
        • et al.
        Association of sex and race/ethnicity with National Institutes of Health funding of surgeon-scientists.
        JAMA Surg. 2020; 156: 195-197