Advertisement

Perineal reconstruction after radical pelvic surgery: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Published:November 20, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2022.09.015

      Abstract

      Background

      Radical resection of pelvic and low rectal malignancies leads to complex reconstructive challenges. Many pelvic reconstruction options have been described including primary closure, omental flaps, and various fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous flaps. Little consensus exists in the literature on which of the various options in the reconstructive armamentarium provides a superior outcome. The authors of this study set out to determine the costs and quality-of-life outcomes of primary closure, vertical rectus abdominus muscle flap, gluteal thigh flap, and gracilis flap to aid surgeons in identifying an optimal reconstructive algorithm.

      Methods

      A decision tree analysis was performed to analyze the cost, complications, and quality-of-life associated with reconstruction by primary closure, gluteal thigh flap, vertical rectus abdominus muscle flap, and gracilis flap. Costs were derived from Medicare reimbursement rates (FY2021), while quality-adjusted life-years were obtained from the literature.

      Results

      Gluteal thigh flap was the most cost-effective treatment strategy with an overall cost of $62,078.28 with 6.54 quality-adjusted life-years and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $5,649.43. Gluteal thigh flap was always favored as the most cost-effective treatment strategy in our 1-way sensitivity analysis. Gracilis flap became more cost-effective than gluteal thigh flap, in the scenario where gluteal thigh flap complication rates increased by roughly 4% higher than gracilis flap complication rates.

      Conclusion

      Our data suggest that, when available, gluteal thigh flap be the first-line option for reconstruction of pelvic defects as it provides the best quality-of-life at the most cost-effective price point. However, future studies directly comparing outcomes of gluteal thigh flap to vertical rectus abdominus muscle and gracilis flap are needed to further delineate superiority.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Yang X.Y.
        • Wei M.T.
        • Yang X.T.
        • et al.
        Primary vs myocutaneous flap closure of perineal defects following abdominoperineal resection for colorectal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Colorectal Dis. 2019; 21: 138-155
        • Devulapalli C.
        • Wei A.T.J.
        • Dibiagio J.R.
        • et al.
        Primary versus flap closure of perineal defects following oncologic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 137: 1602-1613
        • Copeland-Halperin L.R.
        • Stewart T.
        • Chen Y.
        • et al.
        Perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: comprehensive review of the literature.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020; 73: 1924-1932
        • Venchiarutti R.L.
        • Solomon M.J.
        • Koh C.E.
        • et al.
        Pushing the boundaries of pelvic exenteration by maintaining survival at the cost of morbidity.
        Br J Surg. 2019; 106: 1393-1403
        • Billig J.I.
        • Hsu J.J.
        • Zhong L.
        • et al.
        Comparison of effective cost and complications after abdominoperineal resection: primary closure versus flap reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 866E-875E
        • Quinn P.L.
        • Oliver J.B.
        • Mahmoud O.M.
        • Chokshi R.J.
        Cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
        J Surg Res. 2019; 241: 15-23
        • Prasath V
        • Quinn PL
        • Oliver JB
        • Arjani S
        • Ahlawat SK
        • Chokshi R
        Cost-effectiveness analysis of infected necrotizing pancreatitis management in an academic setting.
        Pancreatology. 2022; 22: 185-193
        • Johnstone M.S.
        Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous versus alternative flaps for perineal repair after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum in the era of laparoscopic surgery.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2017; 79: 101-106
        • Hainsworth A.
        • Al Akash M.
        • Roblin P.
        • et al.
        Perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps.
        Br J Surg. 2012; 99: 584-588
        • Winterton R.I.S.
        • Lambe G.F.
        • Ekwobi C.
        • et al.
        Gluteal fold flaps for perineal reconstruction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2013; 66: 397-405
        • Arnold P.B.
        • Lahr C.J.
        • Mitchell M.E.
        • et al.
        Predictable closure of the abdominoperineal resection defect: a novel two-team approach.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 214: 726-732
        • Scheufler O.
        • Farhadi J.
        • Kovach S.J.
        • et al.
        Anatomical basis and clinical application of the infragluteal perforator flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118: 1389-1400
        • Kokosis G.
        • Sun Z.
        • Avashia Y.J.
        • et al.
        V-Y fasciocutaneous flap closure technique is a safe and efficacious alternative to primary closure of the perineal wound following abdominoperineal resection.
        Am J Surg. 2017; 213: 371-376
        • Kokosis G.
        • Phillips B.T.
        • Soo J.
        • et al.
        Modified V-Y fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection in irradiated patients prevents wound dehiscence and associated complications: a retrospective analysis and benchtop confirmation.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2019; 82: 218-223
        • Butler C.E.
        • Gündeslioglu A.Ö.
        • Rodriguez-Bigas M.A.
        Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206: 694-703
        • Perrault D.
        • Kin C.
        • Wan D.C.
        • et al.
        Pelvic/perineal reconstruction: time to consider the anterolateral thigh flap as a first-line option?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020; 8
        • Singh M.
        • Kinsley S.
        • Huang A.
        • et al.
        Gracilis flap reconstruction of the perineum: an outcomes analysis.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2016; 223: 602-610
        • Logiudice J.A.
        • Haberman K.
        • Sanger J.R.
        The anterolateral thigh flap for groin and lower abdominal defects: a better alternative to the rectus abdominis flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133: 162-168
        • Pang J.
        • Broyles J.M.
        • Berli J.
        • et al.
        Abdominal- versus thigh-based reconstruction of perineal defects in patients with cancer.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2014; 57: 725-732
        • Yu P.
        • Wong S.
        • Garvey P.
        • Skibber J.
        Reconstruction of pelvic exenteration defects with anterolateral thigh-vastus lateralis muscle flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1177-1185
        • Sheckter C.C.
        • Shakir A.
        • Vo H.
        • et al.
        Reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection (APR): Indications and complications from a single institution experience.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016; 69: 1506-1512
        • Lee J.Y.
        • Ock M.
        • Jo M.W.
        • et al.
        Estimating utility weights and quality-adjusted life year loss for colorectal cancer-related health states in Korea.
        Sci Rep. 2017; 7
        • Hill J.
        • Meadows H.
        • Haboubi N.
        • et al.
        Pathological staging of epidermoid anal carcinoma for the new era.
        Colorectal Dis. 2003; 5: 206-213
        • Flynn D.E.
        • Mao D.
        • Yerkovich S.T.
        • et al.
        The impact of comorbidities on post-operative complications following colorectal cancer surgery.
        PLoS One. 2020; 15
        • Wiatrek R.L.
        • Thomas J.S.
        Papaconstantinou HT perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection.
        Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2008; 21: 76-85
        • Harris R.P.
        • Helfand M.
        • Woolf S.H.
        • et al.
        Current methods of the U.S. preventive services task force: a review of the process.
        Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20: 21-35
        • Chu P.C.
        • Wang J. Der
        • Hwang J.S.
        • Chang Y.Y.
        Estimation of life expectancy and the expected years of life lost in patients with major cancers: extrapolation of survival curves under high-censored rates.
        Value Health. 2008; 11: 1102-1109
        • Neumann P.J.
        • Cohen J.T.
        • Weinstein M.C.
        Updating cost-effectiveness: the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 796-797
        • Touny A.
        • Othman H.
        • Maamoon S.
        • et al.
        Perineal reconstruction using pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM).
        J Surg Oncol. 2014; 110: 752-757
        • Matsuda K.
        • Hotta T.
        • Takifuji K.
        • et al.
        Long-term comorbidity of diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for perineal wound complications after an abdominoperineal resection.
        Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2008; 3941: 65-70
        • Bullard K.M.
        • Trudel J.L.
        • Baxter N.N.
        • Rothenberger D.A.
        Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48: 438-443
        • Spasojevic M.
        • Mariathasan A.B.
        • Goscinski M.
        • et al.
        Vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap repair improves perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for irradiated locally advanced rectal cancer.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25: 1357-1365
        • Sharabiany S.
        • Blok R.D.
        • Lapid O.
        • et al.
        Perineal wound closure using gluteal turnover flap or primary closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: study protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial (BIOPEX-2 study).
        BMC Surg. 2020; 20: 1-8
        • Musters G.D.
        • Klaver C.E.L.
        • Bosker R.J.I.
        • et al.
        Biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the BIOPEX-study).
        Ann Surg. 2017; 265: 1074-1081
        • Thiele J.R.
        • Weber J.
        • Neeff H.P.
        • et al.
        Reconstruction of perineal defects: a comparison of the myocutaneous gracilis and the gluteal fold flap in interdisciplinary anorectal tumor resection.
        Front Oncol. 2020; 10: 668
        • Niranjan N.S.
        • Loh C.Y.Y.
        • Ogunleye A.A.
        • et al.
        Genitourinary and perineal reconstruction.
        Plast Surg Princ Pract. 2022; : 622-641
        • Nichols D.S.
        • Satteson E.
        • Harbor P.
        • et al.
        Factors associated with the use of vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection for anorectal cancer.
        J Surg Oncol. 2020; 122: 923-927
        • Nelson R.A.
        • Butler C.E.
        Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus thigh flaps for immediate reconstruction of pelvic and perineal cancer resection defects.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123: 175-183
        • Blok R.D.
        • Hagemans J.A.W.
        • Burger J.W.A.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of a subcutaneous gluteal turnover flap without donor site scar for perineal closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2019; 23: 751
        • Chong T.W.
        • Balch G.C.
        • Kehoe S.M.
        • et al.
        Reconstruction of large perineal and pelvic wounds using gracilis muscle flaps.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22: 3738-3744
        • Van Ramshorst G.H.
        • Young J.M.
        • Solomon M.J.
        Complications and impact on quality of life of vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for reconstruction in pelvic exenteration surgery.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2020; 63: 1225-1233
        • O’Dowd V.
        • Burke J.P.
        • Condon E.
        • et al.
        Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap and quality of life following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a multi-institutional study.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2014; 18: 901-906
        • Radwan R.W.
        • Tang A.M.
        • Harries R.L.
        • et al.
        Vertical rectus abdominis flap (VRAM) for perineal reconstruction following pelvic surgery: a systematic review.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021; 74: 523-529
        • Hannes S.
        • Reinisch A.
        • Bechstein W.O.
        • Habbe N.
        Salvage abdominoperineal excisions in recurrent anal cancer: impact of different reconstruction techniques on outcome, morbidity, and complication rates.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016; 31: 653-659