Advertisement

Average treatment effect of facility hepatopancreatobiliary malignancy case volume on survival of patients with nonoperatively managed hepatobiliary malignancies

Published:November 17, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2022.10.011

      Abstract

      Background

      Surgical volume-outcome relationships have been described for a variety of procedures. There is scant literature on total institutional volume and outcomes in patients who are nonoperatively managed. We examined the average treatment effect of total hepatopancreatobiliary malignancy case volume on survival outcomes of patients with nonresected hepatobiliary malignancies.

      Methods

      We identified patients with hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies [pancreatic adenocarcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, hepatocellular carcinoma, biliary tract cancers] within the National Cancer Database (2004–2018). We determined percentile thresholds based on the total annual hepatopancreatobiliary malignancy case volume. We then identified nonoperatively managed patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or biliary tract cancers. We used inverse probability-weighted Cox regression to estimate the effect of facility volume on overall survival.

      Results

      We identified 710,988 patients with hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies. Total annual hepatopancreatobiliary malignancy case volume of 32, 71, and 177 cases/year corresponded to the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. A total of 96,420 with hepatocellular carcinoma and 52,627 patients with biliary tract cancers were managed nonoperatively. In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or biliary tract cancer, treatment at ≥25th, ≥50th, and ≥75th percentile facilities was associated with improved median, 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival compared with treatment at lower-percentile facilities. On inverse probability–weighted Cox analysis, treatment at higher-percentile facilities resulted in a lower hazard of death. Consistent findings were observed in patients with early or intermediate/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic biliary tract cancers.

      Conclusion

      Patients with nonoperatively managed hepatocellular carcinoma or biliary tract cancer who receive treatment at higher-volume facilities have improved survival outcomes. These data suggest regionalization of care for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or biliary tract cancer to high-volume centers may improve survival.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Siegel R.L.
        • Miller K.D.
        • Fuchs H.E.
        • Jemal A.
        Cancer statistics, 2022.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2022; 72: 7-33
        • Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program
        Cancer stat facts: liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer.
        • Cidon E.U.
        Resectable cholangiocarcinoma: reviewing the role of adjuvant strategies.
        Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2016; 10: 43-48
        • She W.H.
        • Chok K.
        Strategies to increase the resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma.
        World J Hepatol. 2015; 7: 2147-2154
        • Chapman B.C.
        • Paniccia A.
        • Hosokawa P.W.
        • et al.
        Impact of facility type and surgical volume on 10-year survival in patients undergoing hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2017; 224: 362-372
        • Idrees J.J.
        • Merath K.
        • Gani F.
        • et al.
        Trends in centralization of surgical care and compliance with National Cancer Center Network guidelines for resected cholangiocarcinoma.
        HPB (Oxford). 2019; 21: 981-989
        • Kommalapati A.
        • Tella S.H.
        • Goyal G.
        • et al.
        Association between treatment facility volume, therapy types and overall survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
        HPB (Oxford). 2019; 21: 379-386
        • Bristow R.E.
        • Palis B.E.
        • Chi D.S.
        • Cliby W.A.
        The National Cancer Database report on advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of hospital surgical case volume on overall survival and surgical treatment paradigm.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 118: 262-267
        • Chen A.Y.
        • Fedewa S.
        • Pavluck A.
        • Ward E.M.
        Improved survival is associated with treatment at high-volume teaching facilities for patients with advanced stage laryngeal cancer.
        Cancer. 2010; 116: 4744-4752
        • Goyal G.
        • Kommalapati A.
        • Bartley A.C.
        • Gunderson T.M.
        • Adjei A.A.
        • Go R.S.
        Association between hospital volume and mortality of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
        Lung Cancer. 2018; 122: 214-219
        • Joshi S.S.
        • Handorf E.A.
        • Zibelman M.
        • et al.
        Treatment facility volume and survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a registry-based analysis.
        Eur Urol. 2018; 74: 387-393
        • Joshi S.S.
        • Handorf E.R.
        • Sienko D.
        • et al.
        Treatment facility volume and survival in patients with advanced prostate cancer.
        Eur Urol Oncol. 2020; 3: 104-111
        • Tella S.H.
        • Kommalapati A.
        • Ganti A.K.
        • Marr A.S.
        Association between hospital volume, therapy types, and overall survival in stage III and IV cutaneous malignant melanoma.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019; 17: 1334-1342
        • American College of Surgeons
        National Cancer Database 2018 PUF Data Dictionary.
        https://bit.ly/33Y8HWE
        Date accessed: September 1, 2022
        • Elshami M.
        • Hue J.J.
        • Hoehn R.S.
        • et al.
        A nationwide analysis of clinical trial participation for common hepato-pancreato-biliary malignancies demonstrates survival advantages for subsets of trial patients but disparities in and infrequency of enrollment.
        HPB (Oxford). 2022; 24: 1280-1290
        • Hue J.J.
        • Katayama E.S.
        • Markt S.C.
        • et al.
        A nationwide analysis of pancreatic cancer trial enrollment reveals disparities and participation problems.
        Surgery. 2021; 172: 257-264
        • Grendar J.
        • Shaheen A.A.
        • Myers R.P.
        • et al.
        Predicting in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing complex gastrointestinal surgery: determining the optimal risk adjustment method.
        Arch Surg. 2012; 147: 126-135
        • Hue J.J.
        • Sugumar K.
        • Markt S.C.
        • et al.
        Reassessing the role of surgery in the elderly or chronically sick with proximal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
        Surgery. 2021; 169: 233-239
        • Olufajo O.A.
        • Reznor G.
        • Lipsitz S.R.
        • et al.
        Preoperative assessment of surgical risk: creation of a scoring tool to estimate 1-year mortality after emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly patient.
        Am J Surg. 2017; 213: 771-777 e1
        • Elshami M.
        • Hoehn R.
        • Hue J.J.
        • et al.
        Medicaid expansion is associated with a higher likelihood of early diagnosis, resection, transplantation, and overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
        HPB (Oxford). 2022; 24: 1482-1491
        • U.S. Census Bureau
        Census regions and divisions of the United States.
        https://bit.ly/35yPyuX
        Date accessed: September 1, 2022
        • Austin P.C.
        • Stuart E.A.
        Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.
        Stat Med. 2015; 34: 3661-3679
        • Greenland S.
        • Pearl J.
        • Robins J.M.
        Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research.
        Epidemiology. 1999; 10: 37-48
        • Tennant P.W.G.
        • Murray E.J.
        • Arnold K.F.
        • et al.
        Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2021; 50: 620-632
        • Beal E.W.
        • Mehta R.
        • Tsilimigras D.I.
        • et al.
        Travel to a high volume hospital to undergo resection of gallbladder cancer: does it impact quality of care and long-term outcomes?.
        HPB (Oxford). 2020; 22: 41-49
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Stukel T.A.
        • Siewers A.E.
        • Goodney P.P.
        • Wennberg D.E.
        • Lucas F.L.
        Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.
        N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 2117-2127
        • Dimick J.B.
        • Osborne N.H.
        • Hall B.L.
        • Ko C.Y.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed?.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210: 503-508
        • Richardson A.J.
        • Pang T.C.
        • Johnston E.
        • Hollands M.J.
        • Lam V.W.
        • Pleass H.C.
        The volume effect in liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2013; 17: 1984-1996
        • Patel T.
        Cholangiocarcinoma: controversies and challenges.
        Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 8: 189-200
        • Recio-Boiles A.
        • Babiker H.M.
        Liver Cancer.
        StatPearls, Treasure Island, FL2022
        • Chen Z.
        • Xie H.
        • Hu M.
        • et al.
        Recent progress in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
        Am J Cancer Res. 2020; 10: 2993-3036
        • Humphrys E.
        • Burt J.
        • Rubin G.
        • Emery J.D.
        • Walter F.M.
        The influence of health literacy on the timely diagnosis of symptomatic cancer: a systematic review.
        Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019; 28e12920
        • Jaruvongvanich V.
        • Assavapongpaiboon B.
        • Wong L.
        Racial/ethnic disparities in gallbladder cancer receipt of treatments.
        J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018; 9: 348-353
        • Kim A.K.
        • Singal A.G.
        Health disparities in diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
        Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2014; 4: 143-145
        • Meriggi F.
        • Graffeo M.
        Clinical characterisation and management of the main treatment-induced toxicities in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis.
        Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13: 584
        • Oneda E.
        • Abu Hilal M.
        • Zaniboni A.
        Biliary tract cancer: current medical treatment strategies.
        Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12: 1237
        • Salgia R.
        • Mendiratta V.
        The multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma.
        Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2021; 17: 405-408
        • Elshami M.
        • Ahmed F.A.
        • Kakish H.
        • et al.
        Average treatment effect of facility hepatopancreatobiliary cancer volume on survival of non-resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
        HPB (Oxford). 2022; 24: 1878-1887
        • Ansari D.
        • Dervenis C.
        • Friess H.
        • Andersson R.
        The challenges of centralization with HPB resectional surgery.
        HPB (Oxford). 2017; 19: 1034-1035
        • Valle J.
        • Wasan H.
        • Palmer D.H.
        • et al.
        Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1273-1281
        • Valle J.W.
        • Wasan H.
        • Johnson P.
        • et al.
        Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study: the UK ABC-01 study.
        Br J Cancer. 2009; 101: 621-627
        • Horgan A.
        • Knox J.
        • Aneja P.
        • Le L.
        • McKeever E.
        • McNamara M.
        Patterns of care and treatment outcomes in older patients with biliary tract cancer.
        Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 44995-45004
        • Klink A.J.
        • Marshall L.Z.
        • Aly A.
        • Seal B.
        • Healey M.J.
        • Feinberg B.
        Real-world treatment patterns and reasons for therapy selection in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in US oncology practices.
        Oncologist. 2022; 27: e265-e272
        • KFF
        Health and health coverage in the South: a data update.
        https://bit.ly/3DBEbxN
        Date accessed: September 1, 2022
        • Hsu C.Y.
        • Lee Y.H.
        • Hsia C.Y.
        • et al.
        Performance status in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: determinants, prognostic impact, and ability to improve the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system.
        Hepatology. 2013; 57: 112-119
        • Peixoto R.D.
        • Renouf D.
        • Lim H.
        A population based analysis of prognostic factors in advanced biliary tract cancer.
        J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014; 5: 428-432